- 75
- Latteland
- gtlover42
Blew 20mil on the GTO. Now to do some pics with the 288 and the Pontiac.
I like using Matterhorn Rotenboden as a test track. It reminds me a lot of the elements that make the Nordschleife so challenging- mostly the narrow, twisty roads and tricky undulating elevations.
No Mitsubishi?Blew 20mil on the GTO. Now to do some pics with the 288 and the Pontiac.
I actually purchased that Audi last weekAudi A4 DTM Red Bull
Mercedes-Benz 300 SL
Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren
Think I've only ever seen those in red and neon green. THAT is sexy!
I know this is an old post, but I found it amusing, because a late 90s NSX does about 8:35 there. The magazine that tested it has the quickest stock NSX (not R) time as far as I know. Confirmed and stock that is. The same magazine that posted said time, did an 8:26 with the 350z. And it was Autosport. They're massively respected. The NSX is a fanboy car. It looks cool, but it is slow and can be outperformed on a track by an e36 M3. Same time period, less than half the price in america and the american e36 was slower the euro one. Every magazine praised the M3 over the NSX. Apparently it can't hold a candle to a 350z either lol. As I said, looks cool...not quick in a straight line and so-so in the handling department. I don't know how otherwise would be expected. Throw an underpowered v6 into a MR chassis, sell it for as much as a Porsche, whilst it is far slower. It must be great though, be cause it looks like a super car. 99.99999% of people who talk it up, have never sat in one, let alone drive one. They also sold like.crap and for good reason. It was not a performer. Looked cool, sounded cool, didn't handle terribly - that's it lol.Comparing a NSX to a 350z is like comparing a Ferrari 458 to a Volkswagen
Hey, i did exactly the same to my C7 Stingray!Transformers Effect:
View attachment 176908
The movie is kind of dumb but still, Camaros. ( New ones are butt ugly BTW )
I know this is an old post, but I found it amusing, because a late 90s NSX does about 8:35 there. The magazine that tested it has the quickest stock NSX (not R) time as far as I know. Confirmed and stock that is. The same magazine that posted said time, did an 8:26 with the 350z. And it was Autosport. They're massively respected. The NSX is a fanboy car. It looks cool, but it is slow and can be outperformed on a track by an e36 M3. Same time period, less than half the price in america and the american e36 was slower the euro one. Every magazine praised the M3 over the NSX. Apparently it can't hold a candle to a 350z either lol. As I said, looks cool...not quick in a straight line and so-so in the handling department. I don't know how otherwise would be expected. Throw an underpowered v6 into a MR chassis, sell it for as much as a Porsche, whilst it is far slower. It must be great though, be cause it looks like a super car. 99.99999% of people who talk it up, have never sat in one, let alone drive one. They also sold like.crap and for good reason. It was not a performer. Looked cool, sounded cool, didn't handle terribly - that's it lol.
Comparing a ferrari to a Volkswagen hahahahaha holy crap, kid.
I bought the Mazda 787B for running 24 min Le Mans. It didn´t go well. I forgot to splash n´dash on the last lap. went empty on Mulsanne straight![]()
My s2000 > 350z, 911, e92 m3
NSX > s2000.![]()
Bought my fourth Huayra. I also bought a Z32.
Yes, unashamedly.You love the Huyabas, don't you?
Yes, unashamedly.