- 1,761
Well I agree on the pt2 of mirrors edge,but the thing that I got against FM3 UI is that is not original,for example car selection menu has the car in showroom mode with white background,just like GT5p,by the other hand GT5 UI is more intuitive,and more stylish,I liked how FM2 presented their cars,I really liked FM2,a lot if I'm honest,that game was original in some strong aspects,like for example the online multiplayer: championships,free lobbies to host the games as you like,and online Time Trial events,My problem with FM3 is that it didn't kept that originality and made a GT5p rip-off,and Mirrors Edge style rip-off(everything white),integrating a matchmaking system to play races that you don't like to race.
Well "port-over cockpits" shows that you didn't played FM2,apart from that,there are more cars to play,so you wont end up playing the same thing over and over again like some tracks which are variations of some other tracks.
A not entirely original UI is not much to complain about imo.. They went for a clean look. A little too clean and sterile perhaps... But it's hardly a game breaker. GT5's menus.. Whoah, this has been covered many times. 90's throwback or what?
White showrooms.. Big deal, it shows the car cleanly and that's all that matters.
Matchmaking, yes that sucked big time. Why the hell they went down that road I'll never know... I had to join a racing league to get away from the public hoppers..
And you're right, I never played much of FM2 as I didn't really feel it at the time. I keep meaning to pick it up as it's less than £5 used.
Either way, I'd take old cockpits over 800 old pixelated cars that don't even have cockpits Then again I use bumper cam, but it's nice to have the option.