What movies have you seen lately? Now with reviews!Movies 

  • Thread starter scentedsoap
  • 8,208 comments
  • 484,449 views
220px-TheGreatGatsby2012Poster.jpg

The Great Gatsby

I have been looking forward to seeing this, probably the most since Inception was released years ago. I loved the book, but was very nervous about how Luhrman would deliver this, given his style which is very OTT.

I was quite impressed with it though - chiefly because it stuck to the story so well and the imagery of East and West Egg somehow was very much how I imagined it to be when reading the book. The vividness of the ashy coal town and the exuberance of the Egg's did come alive though, which was wonderful to watch. Di Caprio was brilliantly suited to Gatsby, I can't think of another actor around today who could pull it off as he did, and McGuire was well cast too as the wide eyed observer being drawn into a world he hasn't known before. I did not care much for Mulligan, but she did portray Daisy well, and the same for Edgarton.

The CGI was at times slightly off - I saw the 2D version and got the feeling some effects were meant for 3D and then scrubbed back for 2D, thus making it a bit disjointed, and I fear the questionable use of hiphop and electronic music will date quite quickly, which would be a shame.

Overall, a very enjoyable movie - 9/10.
 
Last edited:
220px-Great_gatsby_74.jpg

The Great Gatsby (1974)

I had an itch to see this version, to compare how the Luhrmann version represented itself and the conclusion is probably not one I expected; maybe it's the trick of CGI and modern cinematography, but the modern Gatsby seemed much more coherent, even paced, intense where it needed to be and subtle elsewhere.

The fascinating comparison went further; both versions stuck closely to the original story, but focused on and highlighted different parts of the story. Luhrmann seems to have taken every image and tried to recreate it, whereas this earlier version rather verbalised the book, almost verbatim in parts, which was oddly jarring and lacking finesse.

The ending of this one also was a bit heavy handed and lacking the brevity of the latter film. One thing that stood out was just how Di Caprio and moreso Edgarton absolutely smashed it out the park. I'm not disappointed I watched this one, even if it highlighted how surprisingly good the latter interpretation is (although whether it stands the test of time, is another question). - 7/10
 
2mgnkvs.jpg


The Mission (Roland Joffé, 1986) -- Jeremy Irons plays a Spanish Jesuit who goes into the South American wilderness to build a mission in the hope of converting the Indians of the region. Robert DeNiro plays a slave hunter who is converted and joins Irons in his mission. When Spain sells the colony to Portugal, they are forced to defend all they have built against the Portugese aggressors. Historical occurences have rarely been so accurately represented as in this movie, not really creating much in the way of a side story, but rather being quite straight forward on the matter, but sensitive enough and cinematographically relevant. Although the actual events really spanned several generations, the compression seems believable enough, with a healthy mix of adventure, action and character development. In the end the movie is a bit slow and not immensely relevant, not in 1986 and not in 2013. But it's still entertaining and a good movie per se. 7/10


9zlle.jpg


'A' Gai Wak (a.k.a. Project A) (Jackie Chan, 1983) -- Fighting against pirates in "old Hong Kong". Chinese costume drama with plenty of over-the-top tongue in cheek action and music. One of the better and still funny Jackie Chan movies of his early, Chinese period, that manages to combine action and fun in one whole package. Great work in the fights and stunts and little else in terms of, well, everything else. Watch it when you have your brain on premeltdown. 5/10


afd009.jpg


Wreck-It Ralph (Rich Moore, 2012) -- A video game villain wants to be a hero and sets out to fulfill his dream, but his quest brings havoc to the whole arcade where he lives. I didn't really want to watch this movie, not because it was animated, but because it was a Disney take on animation that was not Toy Story, and was expecting some over-the-top cheesinesss. With that said, this movie was very original, with some very likeable characters and even John C. Reilly manages to be cool enough (though I still hate the guy). As I said, the plot seems well-thought and clever enough, making it something new, but working on the same context as always: being a true hero and all that. Yet, the theme is sweet, but not overloaded. It's a great effort and something that the genre needed. 7.5/10
 
MV5BNzMyMjIxNjMzMl5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwMjIzODIzMQ@@._V1_SY317_CR5,0,214,317_.jpg


The Warrior 2010 - forgot what this movie was about so went into it blind. Huh, India it looks like, or Pakistan? And that guy's wearing chainmail in a mud and straw hut in a desert. Okay, you have my interest.

And kept my interest. Watched it without getting up for anything, not even my regular once every 60-75 minutes cigarette break... though part of that may be it's only 86 minutes long. But still, didn't even pause it to check my email or anything.

I liked it quite a bit, though I can't say that I understood everything (there were subtitles, but I know I missed some stuff that was culturally assumed.) One thing in particular I liked was how little dialogue there was.
 
fan_art_fast_and_furious_6_by_imaginaline-d47d32b.jpg


It's exactly what you expect. Some great cars, chases, stunts, explosion and some mediocre acting. I was please with it.
 
I finally watched The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey earlier this week...

220px-The_Hobbit-_An_Unexpected_Journey.jpeg

I'd heard plenty of criticism about the decision to make it a trilogy, and after having watched the first segment, I'm inclined to agree that it's overly stretched. While I couldn't get enough of the LOTR trilogy - and love the extended versions of all three movies over the theatrical releases - I can't see how TH:AUJ could stand to be any longer than it already is.

While I ended up enjoying the film well enough, I couldn't help but notice several things that make it less enjoyable than say The Return Of The King - firstly, the dwarves all look completely false, and Martin Freeman just doesn't cut it for me - some other roles are not particularly well cast either IMO.

The film looks great, but the old orange-blue contrast is extremely overused - I noticed it a fair way into the film the first time around, but upon a second viewing, it is even more obvious from early on in the film - by the end, it is practically everywhere.

All in all, it's still a great film - but I think it's less menacing/scary, more child-like and generally more lightweight than the LOTR trilogy.

Marks so far after two viewings: 7/10
 
MV5BMTgwMzU1MDEyMl5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwNDc5Mzg3OA@@._V1_SX214_.jpg


Wow, great movie! Watched the 2hr 46min version, lots of pure cinematography, very little dialogue through many important scenes and yet so much is conveyed. Why isn't Bronson killing Fonda?!? Even helping him to survive?!? Very clever story, quite enjoyable to watch as everything unfolds.

Only point off: that damn harmonica refrain! But you'll understand that by the end too, and really, at that point it makes it an even better movie.
 
My grandparents went out and watched The Internship last night and took me along to go see it.

Two big things stood out with me: abrupt/uncoordinated camera angle cuts (people changed positions suddenly and some dialog sounded kind of rushed), and the use of just about every cliche plot mechanic out there. There were some genuinely funny parts, and (without really spoiling anything) viewers find out why peer pressure can be a good thing, but it could have been executed quite a bit better.

Score: 5/10. Watch the funny parts on YouTube, but don't waste your time and money on it.
 
tumblr_medcgdvtfB1qkxuslo1_1280.jpg


Red Dawn (2012)

Alright film to procrastinate with. First 5 minutes are a little slow but it's worth the wait. Action comes aplenty once it gets going and for a movie that could've potentially been a snoozer they did the smart thing by moving things along faster than you would expect.

I give it a solid 7/10
 
Fast-and-furious-6-movie.jpg


Just saw it yesterday for the 2nd time :) with some of my best buddies 👍

Totally in love with it. The Airplane part was a little bit stupid, tough... but I still liked it very, very much.

Great cars, great music, good acting, good story overall (see the tank chase)... it's very enjoyable... and the spin at the end of the movie... wow... it's just intriguing and I'm already looking forward to part 7 :) This just my kind of movie, it has everything I like 👍
 
Wreck-it Ralph-A very enjoyable family film, its about an arcade video game bad guy who want to be a good guy, so he embarks on a journey to get a medal through other arcade games, Voices by John C Reilly, Sarah Silverman and Jane Lynch...like I said this is a very enjoyable film and I loved all the gaming references 8

FlightA drama about an airline pilot who miraculously lands a plane whilst drunk and intoxicated, the film is about the aftermath with him battling his demons and the inquiry in the public eye, starring Denzel Washington, Don Cheadle and John Goodman, A fantastic film, Denzel is perfect as Captain William 'whip' Whittaker 8
 
iron-man-3-poster.jpg


Iron Man 3 - (7/10)

While everyone gets over my average score of a Marvel film (I am a Marvel fanboy), let me just say that I am almost certain all issue had to do with the switch to Shane Black as director and writer. Do I have an overall dislike of Shane Black? No, I love the Lethal Weapon films and even The Monster Squad. Is that the vision I think should be making these Avengers franchise films? No. A Voice over opening, a twist that is as much for comedy as storytelling, and some bad guy actions lacking in motivation. And, I think he had no clue what to do with The Mandarin.

But, when you remove that from the equation and look at the film in the Avengers saga, it still works, and it works just fine. Tony Stark is Tony Stark, we don't forget that he has fought aliens and flown into wormholes, and we know he is far from perfect.

Unfortunately the way they handled The Mandarin was ridiculous. At least now the Ben Kingsley casting choice makes more sense. And there were parts of Killian's plan that seemed added on just to make him a more evil villain.

To explain;

The other films had hints that The Mandarin was behind the scenes, building up to a global threat. Instead it is a drunk actor just play acting. And I never did get a clear reason why Killian wanted, or needed to kill the president. He now has an inside man as the president for less than a term? It's pointless and does nothing to aid AIM in its goals. I understand faking terrorists to explain their mistakes. I don't understand starting to kill people on purpose. You go from unethical science and manslaughter to straight up terrorism, murder, and treachery without a legitimate end game other than, "I own the terrorism game." The guy went from anonymity to trying to rule the free world. It doesn't make sense. If you ignore that, and look at the personal relationship, it makes sense. It's almost like Shane Black took the AIM storyline and decided it wasn't evil enough. On that note, I would have taken MODOK over walking thermal bombs any day of the week. That reminds me, trading in Fing Fang Foom for Ethan Hawke breathing fire, not cool.

And one last thing. If AIM didn't get their funding from Stark and Mandarin was actually a decoy, how did they get the funding to develop Extremis?

What this film did do is kind of close the door on the Iron Man tale until he is called upon for The Avengers in a satisfying way. One disturbing aspect though, and again I blame Black, not a single SHIELD interaction with a very serious terroristic threat on the nation? It's like we wanted a standalone movie to be in a bubble, but it had too much history to be involved.

It felt like enough was done to tie it in, and let Black keep his job, but Shane Black didn't want to be a team player. Even just the visual style of the credits was painfully different. Even if I didn't know they had a new director I could have told you there was a switch by the time the film ended.

Overall, it's good, fun, and still Iron Man, but the new direction doesn't quite mesh with the rest of the saga. Or Phase II might be in a direction I'm not excited about.
 
I saw Man of Steel a couple of days ago, before I go into details THERE WILL BE SPOILERS, but my overall rating would be a 8.5/10.

To set things straight I am a huge Batman fan, I don't really like Superman because of the fact he is practically invincible, but I still think he is pretty cool superhero. In the movie, they spent a fairly large amount of time on Krypton explaining the planet's fate and who General Zod was. Now I hadn't read or watched any of the original TV shows or comics on Superman so it was a bit of a refresh for me. I hadn't realized that the reason SM was so powerful was from the coding or central system that determined a Krypton native's role in the society, and that SM or Cal's father implanted it into him. Before Cal was sent away there was some, not really needed baby "nudity."
The way the story continued on was interesting compared to some of the other superhero movies, in MOS they swapped between SM's past as a kid and as a teenager, as they showed the various jobs he went through in order to find the, not exactly, but the ship that contained the fortress of solitude. After General Zod came back from his banishment sent his agents down to just about destroy SM, while the military just emptied rounds into the indestructible agents of Zod, like I said I don't really know too much about SM. If you are really into these movies pay close attention to the background, there were at least two Lex Corp. sponsors, and while SM and Zod are fighting and they fly up to a satellite, it says Wayne Industries on the side. The ending fight scene was a little tough to watch because it was so grey and everything was happening so fast.

The way I judge the majority of movies in general is whether or not I would spend 20 to 30+ dollars on a Blu-Ray version. In Man of Steel's case, I probably wouldn't, there was just something about it I didn't like, but yet there was something that I liked a lot. I just can't put my finger on it.
 
Iron Man 3. Watched it in the cheap theater.

Overall it was much better than I expected. A few bad parts and I didn't care much for the enemies but still a great movie. I posted more info in the Iron Man 3 thread. I still think the first is my favorite but the 3rd is right up there with it.
 
world-war-z-poster.jpg


World War Z.

For some odd reason I thought it was gonna be released in December. Much to my delight I checked the cinemas last Friday and there it was. As a fan of zombies I find the movie very entertaining even though Brad Pitt is the main protagonist. The zombies were like ants! It's insane! :scared:

The part where Israel becomes last safe place because of the wall they built around their country (or is it city?). I find it funny that the reason the zombies climbed up the wall was because of some religious chanting. Lol, in the end, even with a huge frickin' wall between you and the hordes of zombies, religion brought the demise of the country.

Also, I liked the fact the scenario portrayed in the movie is actually quite plausible. Take rabies for example, what if the virus mutates and was able to cause the same symptoms to humans as they would for dogs. Human would go mad and start biting other people. The '12 second infection' thing though seems rather ridiculous, but isn't at all impossible because a virus can mutate and be capable of anything.

Don't have a rating to give because it would be biased for me to give one but I will definitely watch it again. 👍
 
Last edited:
World War Z.

For some odd reason I thought it was gonna be released in December. Much to my delight I checked the cinemas last Friday and there it was. As a fan of zombies I find the movie very entertaining even though Brad Pitt is the main protagonist. The zombies were like ants! It's insane! :scared:


Don't have a rating to give because it would be biased for me to give one but I will definitely watch it again. 👍

I've seen trailers for it, the zombies look like a combination of I am Legend (I don't know if they were technically zombies in this film) and 28 days/weeks later, like super zombies :lol:

Sounds like it's worth a watch then, I too am a huge fan of zombie films, and when done well they can be very very good. Like 28 days/weeks later.
 
I've seen trailers for it, the zombies look like a combination of I am Legend (I don't know if they were technically zombies in this film) and 28 days/weeks later, like super zombies :lol:

Sounds like it's worth a watch then, I too am a huge fan of zombie films, and when done well they can be very very good. Like 28 days/weeks later.

Yeah, the start of it reminds me of I Am Legend too, the scene/setting and all. They were actually vampires in I Am Legend, that's why they're afraid of daylight. Don't really know how everyone became vampires though.

If 28 Days/Weeks Later brought the 'running zombies' then World War Z introduced 'flying zombies'. :lol:

:scared:
 
With the ironman films, they try to keep it realist and through in a curveball or two for good measure. Mandarin is far from realistic but they brought him in in a sort of gimmicky way, as a front man, he had the 10 rings but for show not as power rings. Yes we've had aliens visit from another realm, super soldiers, gods, genius', assassins. A sorcerer just seems far fetched for this universe.

Everything thus far is justified, genetics with extremis had a logical story which i thought played out well and it put a funny spin on things which ironman in general does well.
Ill give it 8.5/10 for being an end of an era. Went out with a bang too :,( just like DKR did.
But Tony will be back for A2 & A3 , no news on IM4 tho.
 
It is interesting how Marvel will handle the standalone hero movies,Iron Man movies have had their run to be honest 3 is enough.
 
It is interesting how Marvel will handle the standalone hero movies,Iron Man movies have had their run to be honest 3 is enough.
I agree. They should let that series go out with a bang. 1 was excellent, 2 was terrible, 3 was very good and had great closure. If they are smart they will stop at Iron Man 3.
 
State of Emergency
This was free on the xbox dashboard. So terrible I didnt even make it half way through the movie before shutting it off. 👎
 
State of Emergency
This was free on the xbox dashboard. So terrible I didnt even make it half way through the movie before shutting it off. 👎

My brother-in-law is the zombie pictured on the cover or whatever you call the image on the dashboard. It was a low-budget, independent film made mostly in Kentucky and Ohio.

It's refreshing to hear a review of one of his movies from someone not in the family. Everyone is so busy being polite and encouraging that I feel like I'm in a room full of idiots. I just want to say, "Are you all crazy? It sucked."
 
Hangover 3, wasn't disappointed but didn't follow the usual hangover direction. It was a hunt rather than a back track. 7/10 for finishing it.
 
4Ik03Qp.jpg


The Young Poisoner's Handbook (Benjamin Ross, 1995) --Based on the true story of a British teenager who allegedly poisoned family, friends, and co-workers. As a boy he first becomes interested in chemistry, and begins to be fascinated by morbid subjects such as poisons and murder. When his family becomes intolerable to him and, he decides to poison those who annoy him. This movie borrows many traits from A Clockwork Orange and for a while it seems almost as a remake of it, to a point. Yet, remaking a Kubkick movie is no easy task and, of course, the movie failed at that. But while the rest of it may be a tad compromising and disturbing, and to a point, even interesting, they whole setup is too tedious and boring to make it a movie worth watching. 5.5/10

lLswCZU.jpg


Spoorloos (a.k.a. The Vanishing) (George Sluizer, 1988) -- If you remember an early 90s movie called The Vanishing, starred by Jeff Bridges and Kiefer Sutherland, this is the original it was remade from, which funnily enough, was called The Vanishing outside its original market. It's about Rex and Saskia, a young couple in love who are on vacation. They stop at a busy service station and Saskia is abducted. After three years and no sign of Saskia, Rex begins receiving letters from the abductor. While I actually enjoyed and liked (and saw first) the remake, this is a review of the original, which I think is also very unsettling and haunting, vividly depicting the banality of evil. It's a tad slower than you'd expect, though the everyday reality of it is what makes it even better, because there's the sense that it could happen just as easily. The ending is chilling and suspenseful to say the least and really tops it as the better movie. If you like Michael Haneke movies, but just want a bit more conclusion, this is one you don't want to miss. 8.5/10

TwphLMW.jpg


Mujeres al Borde de un Ataque de Nervios (a.k.a. Women on the Verge of a Nervous Breakdown) (Pedro Almodóvar, 1988) -- A woman's lover leaves her, and she tries to contact him to find out why he's left. She confronts his wife and son, who are as clueless as she. Meanwhile her girlfriend is afraid the police are looking for her because of her boyfriend's criminal activities. They talk to a female lawyer, who turns out to be the lover's new lover, and everyone's path keeps crossing each other's in a very complicated and confusing manner. This is exactly the type of movie that made Almodóvar famous, even before his movies became solely about transvestites, prostitutes and incest, and before he could even be considered Oscar-worthy, even if the movie was actually nominated for the Best Foreign Film Oscar. Yet, the movie is from the time when his movies had much more comedy value and weren't so deep, which isn't really a bad thing, but it was just 'different'. The way the movie jumps between comedy and tragedy is seamless and the excellent performances turn it into one of the best movies by Almodóvar, while remaining stricly PG-13-ish. 8/10

JdAwKsk.jpg


Breathless (Jim McBride, 1983) -- Jesse has to get out of Las Vegas quickly, and steals a car to drive to L.A. On the way he shoots a police man. When he makes it to L.A. he stays with Monica, a girl he has only known for a few days. As the film progresses, the police get closer to him, and the crimes escalate. This is also a remake, of a movie called À bout de souffle from the brilliant mind of Jean-Luc Godard. No surprise comes when the remake is not that good, but I certainly didn't expect it to be so bad either. In part it's because of Richard Gere's acting, which is so good that it makes it obvious as to how bad Valérie Kaprisky's was. The movie seems more like a silly excuse to have spotty acting and X-rated scenes, which was really a very 80s thing. In the end it's a movie about a tragic hero doing nothing right and the dumb woman-object following him around, with some failed intentions of making it seem real, when it's quite obvious it can't be. 4.5/10
 
Yeah, the start of it reminds me of I Am Legend too, the scene/setting and all. They were actually vampires in I Am Legend, that's why they're afraid of daylight. Don't really know how everyone became vampires though.

If 28 Days/Weeks Later brought the 'running zombies' then World War Z introduced 'flying zombies'. :lol:

:scared:

I watched World War Z yesterday, I absolutely loved it. Out of the films I've watched this year it's probably my favourite. However I tend to really nit pick with films, and this is what bugged me a little:

The satellite phone annoyed me, whilst on the plane to Cardiff he rings the U.N boat off the coast of America and hands the phone to the pilot of the plane. And whilst the pilots on the phone the battery dies.
But when he does get to the W.H.O research facility the battery as miraculously gained a full charge and he was able to ring the boat again.

Plus Brad Pitts wife seems very nonchalant about the whole situation. He tells her he has to go and find the source of the infection and she doesn't seem too bothered. And they say goodbye as if he's popping down to the shops.

Lastly Brad Pitts ability to survive the things he does is a bit far fetched. We see fully trained Black Ops troops getting killed, and tonnes of soldiers. Yet this U.N representative managed to survive numerous skirmishes with the zombies, armed with nothing but axes and a rifle with limited ammo. He survives the plane crash, the downfall of Israel, running through 80 infected to get to the vault.

Also like you I thought the ending was a bit wishy washy and could have been done better.

But like I said I really loved this film, but I have this thing about trying to find flaws and mistakes in films, no matter how insignificant they are.
 
42... good movie, TONS of classic cars, since it's 1945-1947 in this movie. Not as much baseball as I was expecting, pretty shallow exploration of Robinson's talents there... but I guess that wasn't the point of the movie. Only real problem, all the period cars were full on restorations. Nothing rusty, no dings, all perfect, not even dust. Oh, and the acting was spotty here and there, though Ford was solid, of course. 8/10 all day long.

And, finally, Battleship Potemkin. Holy wtf mother of god, this is freaking amazing for 1925, the guy who made this was way ahead of his time conceptually. Granted, it's quite slow for modern audiences, and is an obvious piece of Bolshevik propaganda. But seriously guys, only 8 years after the revolution? This movie is so ancient it's hard to comprehend. Real history here. MUST SEE. 10/10.
 
Last edited:
The Last Stand A high profile gangster is being moved to death row and he manages to escape during the police convoy, he heads toward Mexico where he'll be a free man and evade capture, the last town he has to pass through before he gets to Mexico however is the sleepy town of Sommerton with its former police officer sheriff (Arnold Schwarznegger) who there to stop him along with his deputies, also stars, Johnny Knoxville, Jaime Alexander and Forest Whittaker, this is not a bad film, its a by the numbers action/thriller that doesn't do any thing new and is predictable....the cars they drive in the film are pretty sweet though!...6.5
 
Just watched Fast 6.

That Daytona was gorgeous.

I've noticed they squeezed in significantly more light-hearted moments than before, especially around Roman. While I did enjoy some of it (i.e. *bang* "it's on the house"), I felt it they may have added a bit too much for an Action film.


Logic went out the window and they totally screwed up the tank scene.
 
Life of PI A zoo owners son who was born in India is telling his life story to a writer who wants to write a book on it, the story includes how he got his name (Piscine Moltiar Patel) how he is a Muslim a Christian and a Hindu and how his family had to move the entire zoo oversees where it would make more money, the boat got caught up in a storm where it sank, only Pi survived and the film centres around him drifting in the ocean with a Hyena, Orangutan and finally a Bengal tiger in a lifeboat for days and weeks just trying to survive, its a beautiful story and the lifeboat part takes up most of the film which was stunning, its very CGI heavy of course I watched on Blu-ray and it was utterly glorious 8
 
Back