- 10,081
- WFG9
I know extremely little about the philosophical movement, so this is more in consideration of how it should be defined, which to me is the advancement of understanding, in an objective sense. But it seems that it has become, or may always have been, the advancement of some leftist tenets. Within which is the rejection of all or most forms of violence.
I don't believe that violence is always an example of being unenlightened. An act of violence could come from one's understanding of a given event, which might be no less intelligent than anyone elses understanding. It might be justified by the understanding.
I reject the notion that some super being will bring the world into enlightentment, because I reject how believers in that dream define enlightenment.
Just because you understand the consequences doesn't mean you would act differently or should.
I don't believe that violence is always an example of being unenlightened. An act of violence could come from one's understanding of a given event, which might be no less intelligent than anyone elses understanding. It might be justified by the understanding.
I reject the notion that some super being will bring the world into enlightentment, because I reject how believers in that dream define enlightenment.
Just because you understand the consequences doesn't mean you would act differently or should.