who will be the next Senna, in the fallowing 5 yrs????

  • Thread starter f1king
  • 52 comments
  • 1,399 views
Some drivers are amazing because they survived racing for so many years. Fangio, for one, was/is held in such high esteem because here was a living, breathing legend who didn't become a recluse. He survived the worst conditions, rarely crashed, and lived until 1995. He once counted that over 30 collegues of his had died in racing events that he too, was competing in.

Actually, isn't there a Victoria Senna...the illegitemate daughter of one Ayrton Senna?
 
Well Mario is still alive for one and no one can argue that he isnt the best of all time. Mansell isnt dead he has to be up there in the ranks of the best. On the other hand Prost as good as he was he will never be looked at as an icon. As far as Dale goes he was thought to be the best before he died. So I dont know if a driver has to die to be seen as great.
 
Thread from the dead.

Have to say I mused at everyone trying to say Michael's not the best for this reason or that. No passion, eh, yeah you could argue that, but I'd like to see you tell the 680 odd Ferrari workforce, down to the guy who brooms their pit area, that they're not passionate. Not to mention the tifosi.

Some of the predictions you guys made were pretty impressive - February 2002 predicting Raikkonen will be a force, and look at 03. Button too has risen, Heidfeld has fallen and Trulli seems to have surprised a few of us.

Who will be the next Michael? How long did it take to find someone to beat Fangio? If the next Fangio/Senna/Schumacher is alive yet, I'd be surprised. It's going to take a while to find someone to match Michael, if it ever happens.
 
there will never be another senna. and there wont be one in the next 5 years.
yet, the same can be said for prost, lauda, brabham, schumacher, actually ALL DRIVERS.

they are all different, all have their good and not so good aspects. different driving styles and different eras. there will never be another senna as you cant compare different eras, so you cant compare a new young hot-shoe to senna as its differnt eras
 
Yeah, comparing people to past drivers and especially dead ones just never works.

We're gonna pwn you at Origin 3 this evening.
 
That's fairly interesting, but considering how old it is it probably has to be re-assessed. Good find:tup:
 
Some good reasoning to some of the points and some I flat out disagree with. 39 poles eh? So that's what, end of 01?
 
I'd normally roll my eyes at old threads being revived, but this actually made pretty good reading - two and a half years ago! I'm pretty happy with my calls - shame about Heidfeld.
 
Theres never been a next "........."

The sport (all sport) changes all the time, different people cope better in different situations. Take Fangio, would he be as great now as he was then? - i doubt he would, but he was in the right place at the right time.
 
f1king
Well Mario is still alive for one and no one can argue that he isnt the best of all time.

Oh, I think they can. Mario was very very good, but he was more of a worker than a flare guy, which puts him in the Prost mould. And also, when discussing the career of Mario Andretti, it is worth doing some research on the automotive product STP. Think Southern Italy.

It is also interesting to note that the STP support is never, ever, mentioned in Gordon Kirby's official Andretti biography, whereas other major sponsorships that Mario acquired were.

I'm not saying that Andretti wasn't any good, but he definitely got where he got because he received significant financial support.

Mansell isnt dead he has to be up there in the ranks of the best.

The best what? Whinger? Mansell's F1 and ChampCar championships were both at the wheel of the car that was the class of the field. Mansell had flashes of genius, but these do not place him anywhere near Senna.

On the other hand Prost as good as he was he will never be looked at as an icon.

I think Prost's "Professor" tag will stick for a while, and he will definitely remain in the top three Most Intelligent F1 drivers for a good few decades.

As far as Dale goes he was thought to be the best before he died. So I dont know if a driver has to die to be seen as great.

My point was that Dale's death would elevate him to the point where people will simply cease to compare others to him.

vat_man
I'd normally roll my eyes at old threads being revived, but this actually made pretty good reading - two and a half years ago! I'm pretty happy with my calls - shame about Heidfeld.

Yep, you were on the money.

With regard to Heidfeld, I think that his career was killed by the reintroduction of traction control. I think this after watching him drive. He's very measured on the brakes, and then also on the throttle. He coaxes the car, teasing more and more grip out of it. This is not the way to be quick in 2004-F1. To be quick nowadays, you have to throw the car at the corner hard on the brakes, let the active diff hold the turn-in oversteer for you, then mash the throttle on exit. Traction control equalises everyone's exit (within the parameters of the car's performance), and so all the time is made up on entry. Heidfeld's entry style is relatively slow given that it doesn't need to be used to hold the car or initiate the exit phase.
 
I was under the impression traction control was dropped for 2004...

I agree about Prost and Mansell. When you debate the greatest, Mansell rarely figures too prominently. Ask French F1 fans if Prost isn't iconic to them ;)
 
Traction control is in. But it's slightly modified from what I understand. It doesn't kick in 'till the cars reach a certain speed.
 
Yes I think it's like 40mph that it kicks in, so no traction control for Loews at Monaco:D.
 
SouL
Traction control is in. But it's slightly modified from what I understand. It doesn't kick in 'till the cars reach a certain speed.

I think it's the first 100m of the race.
 
I'd actually be interested to see what Sebastion Bourdais could do in an F1 car. He said his ultimate goal is to reach F1 and the way he is going in Champcars this year it looks like he might be in F1 in a few years. I wouldn't be suprised to hear if he goes into testing for a team in a season or two -- maybe even get a race seat.

Blake
 
I think it's quite clear Alonso is bound for stardom, he's alread acheived hero status for a few reasons. Montoya... I don't honestly know how long he'll be good, I can see his career going the way of Villeneuve if he's not careful (the successive bad years with low teams, not the championship winning part). I think he just needs to mellow out a bit and work harder in all honesty - how much testing do you see him attending? Michael Schumacher not only probably personally knows almost everyone who's cleaned the ground his car has touched, but he's got a cordial relationship with all of them. It may all just be a mind game but it gets people positive and willing to work his way, that's an important skill.

Raikkonen, there's a man I see carrying on a proud Finnish tradition in racing. Button in a few years time perhaps.
 
Hmmm, Montoya is a little too "blame it on everyone else, it's not my fault if I don't perform". If he puts in some REALLY hard yards I believe he could do well at McLaren, but without the effort he won't get a reward.

Blake
 
I was reading an interview with him recently in the newspaper and he did nothing but praise his efforts and rubbish the car and the team. That's not exactly a constructive personality - when you compare it to Mark Webber living near the factory, playing soccer and chatting with all the guys who work for Jaguar, there's a man who tries to stay positive and work hard no matter what gets thrown at him, from random retirements to being taken out by teammates, he stays cool. It's not very often through the year you see Montoya's name on the timesheets for testing.
 
Back