Who would you chose?

  • Thread starter Magic069
  • 36 comments
  • 1,104 views

Which would you leave your young son with for a one night babysitting job?

  • Micheal Jackson

    Votes: 1 12.5%
  • Mike Tyson

    Votes: 7 87.5%

  • Total voters
    8
5,891
For some awkward weird transverse reason, you have to leave you son with one of the two! YOU HAVE TOO, NO WAY AROUND IT!

Considering they are both crazy, which would you chose and why?
 
Jackson is a friggin petifile,..... no one settles out of court for 20 million when they're innocent. :irked:

On the other hand, if your kid pisses Tyson off, he'd probably toss him/her in the oven and have some dinner. :P

I picked Tyson, even though he has shown us his canabolistic side, he probably doesnt eat children. As to where Michael would like nothing better than to chump some tube steak, aged less than 13 years :lol:
 
Its not my idea, a radio show I listen too had been talking about it, and I thought I would ask GTP the same question.

Its a basic question on which you think is crazier.
 
Exactly... ;) So does that mean your not going to answer?

Originally posted by Red Eye Racer
What the general concensous from the radio?

They were saying Mike Jackson for awhile, because they could kick his ass if he did something to their child, but then they started saying they would go with Tyson because if the kid got a ass beating it would be less trumatising as getting molested. Then they moved on to something else.

So I really don't know. :confused:
 
I'm going with Red Eye Racer.

I would probably leave my son (if I had one) with Mike Tyson. I also think Tyson wouldn't eat a child, and if my son pissed him off, Tyson would probably beat his ass, which is a lot better than him getting molested. Who knows, maybe Tyson would teach my kid how to box and show him a few fights on HBO?

OA
 
Mike Tyson. No way I'd choose Michael Jackson, he's got child issues. Never mind, the paparazzi would probably harm my kid for life.
 
Have you seen this?
tyson_i.jpg
 
Originally posted by Klostrophobic


I'm betting it's not a real tattoo.


You may be onto somthing,... your supposed to keep them moist with triple-anti-biotics,.... but I don't see that effect (shineyness) on his.......

Also,... it would be partially swollen and redish,... looks pretty flat and clean to me......
 
Originally posted by Red Eye Racer
You may be onto somthing,... your supposed to keep them moist with triple-anti-biotics,.... but I don't see that effect (shineyness) on his.......

Also,... it would be partially swollen and redish,... looks pretty flat and clean to me......

Well his is black so you might not be able to see that as much, especially in a crappyuu picture. I think I can see swelling, though. I mean, were talking about a guy who bit someone's ear off for crissakes. I doubt he's afraid of a tattoo. But then who gives a crap anyway.
 
I chose Michael Jackson. I think that Tyson is psychotic, completely and utterly psychotic. With added mental imbalance. It would be very difficult for a child to understand this, because they lack a perception of the moods of others. If not a perception, then certainly an ability to make reasoned decisions based upon that.

All this is a way of saying that a child could annoy Tyson to an extent that he would be moved to physical violence, without even really realising it.

And those of you who say it's better to be beaten up than molested: well, not if it's a beating that you don't walk away from. That little Louise Woodward killed a child, you think it would be an issue for Tyson to smash an 11 year-old sternum, because I sure don't.

Further to this, I'm really not sure I believe that Jackson is actively engaged in sexual activity with these children. I know, I know, he paid millions of dollars to stop a case from going to court, but that would only have been upon the advice of his lawyers, who would have made a nice percentage from that settlement. I think he's wierd, sure, but I don't believe he's a child molester, and I would, in this instance, place my faith in him.
 
If my kid has a Taser, or Stun-Gun, either one. It really depends on who I would like to see my "brat" send 50,000 volts thru for kicks and giggles.
 
Originally posted by Gil
If my kid has a Taser, or Stun-Gun, either one. It really depends on who I would like to see my "brat" send 50,000 volts thru for kicks and giggles.

Definitely Tyson then. Maybe he'd eat his own tongue.
 
Well, I definitely am not going to leave any of my kids with either of these idiots without some means of "equalization".
 
Yeah, this thread is like asking "would you rather see your kid thrown off the Golden Gate Bridge or run down by a dump truck?"
 
I'm pretty sure either of my two youngest would zap either "mike" on GP, just to see it the Taser/Stun-gun worked.
Then, my fifth would zap 'em every few minutes just to watch 'em writhe (do the "hi-voltage dance"). He's a bit ornery.

This particular child is one of the smallest, MEANEST, futsal goalies you will ever see for his age (12).
He lives to "educate" other players to stay out of the goalie box.

Neither 'mike' would stand a chance with him.:lol:
 
I know Tyson will do a great job watching my kid for a night because I know he's broke. That tattoo must have been the last $50 Don King allowed him this week.
 
Originally posted by pupik
I know Tyson will do a great job watching my kid for a night because I know he's broke. That tattoo must have been the last $50 Don King allowed him this week.

I just saw him on TV saying that it's not even half done.
 
I will be willing to bet none of you have met either of them, let alone get to know them. none of you have the right to judge someone you havent met. you only know what you see on tv and read about them. Im saying this because i have been disgusted at all of the michael jackson crap on tv lately. it is all BS. then when i see ****ing morons like jay leno make jokes about it, it just sickens me.

I find it funny that you heard this on the radio. Arent radio shows notorious for talking about hollywood, celebrities, and other BS? and actually pretending what they say is important?

this is a stupid poll.
 
Originally posted by advanR
I will be willing to bet none of you have met either of them, let alone get to know them. none of you have the right to judge someone you havent met. you only know what you see on tv and read about them. Im saying this because i have been disgusted at all of the michael jackson crap on tv lately. it is all BS. then when i see ****ing morons like jay leno make jokes about it, it just sickens me.

I find it funny that you heard this on the radio. Arent radio shows notorious for talking about hollywood, celebrities, and other BS? and actually pretending what they say is important?

this is a stupid poll.

Shut up you moron.
 
Back