- 505
- United States
Why doesn't somebody just purchase a channel? It would be expensive obviously but why don't we have a channel for racing coverage only?
Why doesn't somebody just purchase a channel? It would be expensive obviously but why don't we have a channel for racing coverage only?
NASCAR is popular, yes, but mainstream in the manner as other mainstreams sports(NBA, NFL, college sports,etc) no really. If you watch Dale Earnhart Jr.'s dvd(Any Given Day) he talks about how NASCAR still have yet to be recognized by the mainstream despite its notoriety.
I have that DVD. Where in the DVD does it say that?
On subject, NASCAR and my home Indycar race, the Belle Isle Grand Prix of Detroit, tend to get the most news coverage in my area. Unless there's a major accident and a well-known driver is injured or killed, that is. When Greg Moore, a former Belle Isle winner, was killed in a crash during the 1999 CART finale at Fontana, it made the local news the following morning. When Paul Dana was killed during the morning warmup for the 2006 Indycar season opener at Homestead, it made the national nightly news. Same with Dan Wheldon's fatal crash in October 2011 during the Indycar World Championships at Las Vegas. It's such a f:censored:ing travesty that stick-and-ball sports - which if you ask me are clearly inferior to motor sports - hog the spotlight while motor sports get next to no attention what-so-f:censored:ing ever. It's sickening.
That is a horrible article. Instead of offering their condolences they simply bash the parents and put the blame on them. Is it me or are they portraying motorsport as some kind of taboo? It's as if it is completely morally wrong to let your child get involved with a sport which has health and safety written all over it, which in actual fact many different sports do. And why do they feel the need to place inverted commas around 'expert'? He was incredibly talented, just because he is not 20 odd years old doesn't mean he hasn't got the skills to ride a bike. I think that media needs to embrace motorsport as something that, like many other sports, can be dangerous. However there is no reason that a footballer who sustains an injury is glanced over and it's put down to the nature of the sport, when say a Moto GP rider breaks a bone and people launch an outcry at this sport for causing injuries.Overall it really infuriates me when the mainstream media does nothing but use the deaths of racers to bash motorsports a whole like in the case of Simoncelli and Peter Lenz.
http://www.salon.com/2010/08/31/indy_peter_lenz/
The fact that some people have preconceived notions of how exciting a race should be, also doesn't help matters, especially if the first race they watch is something pretty boring even to hardcore fans.
EarthAlso there is very little respect for the skill needed in racing. Believe it or not theres alot of people who think because they can drive their car back and forth to work, then they're capable of being a top tier racecar driver. I believe one music artist said because he drove down a dark country road at night going 100mph he could be a NASCAR driver and thus disagreed with Jimmie Johnson winning athlete of the year. So then motorsports loses the appeal of being highly skilled to the mainstream.
Also there is very little respect for the skill needed in racing. Believe it or not theres alot of people who think because they can drive their car back and forth to work, then they're capable of being a top tier racecar driver. I believe one music artist said because he drove down a dark country road at night going 100mph he could be a NASCAR driver and thus disagreed with Jimmie Johnson winning athlete of the year. So then motorsports loses the appeal of being highly skilled to the mainstream.
Yeah that really doesn't help.. stuff like the British GP gets hyped up so much, non motorsports fans watch it, and expect something it was never going to be.
And boy, don't even get me started with the Daytona 500.
Those people are idiots. They should know that road driving and racing a two completely different things.
In the cause and effect relationship, a lack of mainstream coverage is the effect. Not the cause. The media is driven by ratings, and so will show what the people want to see. If there is no interest in motorsports, there will be no coverage of motorsports. You cannot expect that television stations will simply start showing more motorsport and people will watch it because it is available. The people know what they want and will watch it. If they're not interested, then they won't watch it. You might get a few people who generate an interest when they idly flip through the channels, but for most people, it will just pass them by.
To add to what others have already said, another problem with recognizing Motorsport in popular media is that there are so many different forms of racing. If you'd ask someone with relatively little knowledge on or if they had no interest in it, what they knew, you'd most likely be replied to with something relating to Formula One. It seems that since it's classed as the best of the best, it's the category that gets the most coverage and recognition.
There are so many different categories of racing, so even if it was made more popular and received better coverage, to actually understand the sport, and have an extensive interest in it would be harder than other sports, because there's so much involved - and so many different people involved. I don't think a lot of people would dedicate the time to it, unless you actually cared about it in the first place.