*drop-kicks GTveteran to Kyoto, Japan* come back when you agree that Porsches aren't ugly!!
(EDIT--->)but, yeah, pink + Porsche = that sound George Lopez makes that sounds like he's about to puke.
Pikes Peak challenge cars are very ugly IMO.
Ugly, but with a purpose!They need those wings since up at the top, the air's so thin that they can't get downforce.Pikes Peak challenge cars are very ugly IMO.
Some examples of Pikes Peak race cars:
No denying that many are very fast though.
Don't you think all racecars look the way they do because of a purpose?Ugly, but with a purpose!
They're better-looking than this year's cars. I always thought the 2008 racers looked like a Christmas turkey with four drumsticks instead of two, and not because they were packed in, but because the turkey was genetically modified to have four. All the aero aids, while no doubt useful, just made them look over-laden.All the new 2009 Formula One cars. But we will get used to them.
They're better-looking than this year's cars. I always thought the 2008 racers looked like a Christmas turkey with four drumsticks instead of two, and not because they were packed in, but because the turkey was genetically modified to have four. All the aero aids, while no doubt useful, just made them look over-laden.
Now I know God loves a tryer, but shame on you Lister.
Now the liveries themselves are quite nice. I just take issue with the fact that they've plastered it onto a chassis with all the aerodynamic efficiency of Rosie O'Donnell.
They weren´t exactly beautiful 40 years ago either:
Those raised wings looks ridiculous!
No. I'm fairly sure it's a variation of the McLaren M7 which was raced in Formula One in the late 1960's.Are you sure that that isn't a Can-Am car?
They weren´t exactly beautiful 40 years ago either:
Those raised wings looks ridiculous!
No. I'm fairly sure it's a variation of the McLaren M7 which was raced in Formula One in the late 1960's.