- 12,122
- Liverpool
- CARBOYXJR
I've never, ever understood the hate for that livery. I think it's beautiful.*One of the best
I've never, ever understood the hate for that livery. I think it's beautiful.*One of the best
Just because it's iconic doesn't mean that it's good by default. It's a matter of personal taste - you can appreciate the history of something without necessarily liking it. I can appreciate what The Beatles did for music, but in all honesty, I don't like their music. The same logic applies here.You lack a sence of history...the Pink Pig is truly iconic and belongs in The Best Liveries of All Time thread. In racing's last gasp before advertising and sponsorship took over, this was a response to using something other than national racing colors.
Just because it's iconic doesn't mean that it's good by default. It's a matter of personal taste - you can appreciate the history of something without necessarily liking it. I can appreciate what The Beatles did for music, but in all honesty, I don't like their music. The same logic applies here.
It has only just dawned upon me how few sponsors McLaren have.
The 1980s threw up all over it.
They're being picky, I guessyep from past backing its crazy poor, why they have such little backing i have no idea.
They're being picky, I guess
It is purely a business now, rather than a sport.with the cut throat business F1 is now, they cant afford to be pick.
That's what they're doing, Ron said their title sponsor would have to fit the brand's philosophy.with the cut throat business F1 is now, they cant afford to be pick.
That's what they're doing, Ron said their title sponsor would have to fit the brand's philosophy.
So, like it or not, their current (and not that bad) livery will be here for a while.
I'd say good marketing rather than egotistical. But each to their own.title sponsor would have to fit the brand's philosophy? how egotistical of them.
And yet, they're doing just fine. Ron Dennis might have invented the idea of a close relationship between team and sponsor, but he reckons that the days of title sponsorship are over - it's too expensive for companies to invest in major sponsor deals.with the cut throat business F1 is now, they cant afford to be pick.
title sponsor would have to fit the brand's philosophy? how egotistical of them.
Not at all. Brands have images associated with them. Look at car manufacturers - German cars emphasise precision engineering, Italian cars are flamboyant, American cars favour raw brawn, and French cars are like cotton candy; cute, but insubstantial.title sponsor would have to fit the brand's philosophy? how egotistical of them.
I might be colour-blind, but I'm not so colour-blind that I think this is anything other than a bad idea:
Light blue? Great! Bright green? Also good! Together? DO NOT WANT.
Badabababaaaaa that's terrible.Markku Alén ran this garish thing at Helsinki Thunder in 1995.
Team Rosberg Calibra with McDonald's livery was pretty bad too.Markku Alén ran this garish thing at Helsinki Thunder in 1995.
F1's worst this year by along way once again. which is sad as they had a chance of putting a great livery on this car.
MotoGP, for me this is just awful.
I don't know, the Castrol livery Toni Gardemeister used in WRC in 2005, was rather good actually.Its a Shame all Modern Castrol Liverys are Terrible, their 90s Liverys in basically every catagory they sponsered where iconic, from the GT500 Supra, Celica WRC and even the Larry Perkins Commodores in V8SC.
Last Good Livery they Had would probably be the early 2000s GT500 NSX before they started promoting their Synthetic oils.
Can't find a good shot of it, but both Attempto racing Mclarens in the Blancpain Sprint Series are using a Hello Kitty livery.
There is, and that exact car was posted yesterday.Just look at the sheer kawaii-ness of that thing. Is there such a thing as Best Liveries thread in here? If so, I'd love to post this one over there as well.