Worst Liveries Of All Time

  • Thread starter Liquid
  • 1,114 comments
  • 199,391 views
01.jpg


Just.... Messy.
 
Yeah I must say it boogers me too. It's not for Mucus Ambrose is it? I mean that colour scheme would really get up his nose.
 
Yeah I must say it boogers me too. It's not for Mucus Ambrose is it? I mean that colour scheme would really get up his nose.

No, that's Jamie McMurray who drives the #1 and it's disgusting.

Edit: I see what you did there. :lol:
 
And what's wrong with the Atomic Kitten?
Let me answer your question with a question of my own: what would you say if the Pussycat Dolls started sponsoring a racing team?

That's what's wrong with Atomic Kitten as a sponsor. The colours don't matter - the problem is that the team was sponsored by a manufactured pop group, and were forced to suffer the indignity of carrying their name around. It's a bit like Paris Hilton sponsoring BQR-Blusens in the 125cc MotoGP class last year. It doesn't matter how good the riders were (and Maverick Vinales is excellent), they're still being sponsored by Paris Hilton. The same applies here: Colin Turkington is good, but he's forced to run around associating himself with Atomic Kitten.
 
Markus Pommer's Formula 2 car for this season:

pommer-car.png


Why is it so bad, you ask?

It's because his sponsor is a live sex site.
 
At least it's more subtle than the BMW that ran at the Nurburgring 24 Hours.:lol:

Can't post pics as they go against the AUP.
 
Justin
At least it's more subtle than the BMW that ran at the Nurburgring 24 Hours.:lol:

Can't post pics as they go against the AUP.

PM me a link please :lol:
 
Markus Pommer's Formula 2 car for this season:

pommer-car.png


Why is it so bad, you ask?

It's because his sponsor is a live sex site.

Just because it offends your morals doesn't make it a bad livery. Besides, live sex is much better than dead sex... or so I've heard.
 
I think it's more the fact that the team has had to go to such lengths to get a sponsor. It's like if a car was sponsored by Andrex, it's not a bad livery because I'm opposed to Andrex, it's a bad livery because the team is sponsored by toilet paper.
 
It hasn't been mentioned because it's not horrible. Unlike Pommer's Live-Strip livery, the whole thing was a gag because the BBC wouldn't let them take money from actual companies.

And its "sponsors" were Peniston Oils and Larsen's Biscuits.
 
Haha, that porn site livery made my day. Absolutely brilliant! :lol:

If I was the driver or even the manager of the team, I'd rather have a toilet paper sponsoring my car than a porn website. You know, which one is better.. Common sense :P
 
I think it's more the fact that the team has had to go to such lengths to get a sponsor. It's like if a car was sponsored by Andrex, it's not a bad livery because I'm opposed to Andrex, it's a bad livery because the team is sponsored by toilet paper.
So? Race cars have been sponsored by things much "worse" than toilet paper for a long time, most notably cigarettes. Are the Marlboro McLarens, JPS Lotuses, West McLarens, Rothmans Porsches, Benson and Hedges Jordans and 555 BARs bad liveries because of the nature of the sponsor?
 
So? Race cars have been sponsored by things much "worse" than toilet paper for a long time, most notably cigarettes. Are the Marlboro McLarens, JPS Lotuses, West McLarens, Rothmans Porsches, Benson and Hedges Jordans and 555 BARs bad liveries because of the nature of the sponsor?

Bad in nature but spectacular in appearance. I noted this in the best livery thread. Cigarette companies might do a lot of bad things but they've given us some spectacular liveries over the years.
 
Back