- 2,351
- Michigan
- FuriousDemon
The biggest challenge for AI though is that Pergusa track. Always about 4-6 DNFs there. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e28e/7e28e189530c7b2ac0718f871c27a4aa5317e89a" alt="Smile :) :)"
I rather have them "wanting" to beat me instead of hotlapping them in a 1000+ HP car.
Totally agree i prefer this game over gt5 honestly
They don't slow down in the sand either.![]()
JJ72If I drive well, I can be a second or so quicker than the Hard AI per lap, if the AI line is bad or I spend sometime with the setup the gap will be larger, however for most people I think the AI is pretty hard to match as it is. I often gladly accept a podium because the AI is just fast.
I actually like the idea that I can't start a one make race and expect to be well in first place by half way through the first lap. It makes things far more realistic and far more enjoyable.
I'd rather lose by a second than win by a minute. Kudos to the AI in this game.
While I do agree that the AI in S2U makes for some interesting races, the argument that beating the AI in GT5 is too easy is completely absurd. They run near-perfect on every lap, with the exception of a couple sore spots at Nurb GP, Grand Valley, etcetera, and are incredibly tough to beat in comparably equipped cars. Leaving the outcome of my race up to the chance occurance of the AI hitting a wall doesn't excite me. If I want that kind of racing, I can go online.
My one real annoyance with the AI, and this cannot be attributed fully with the AI, is when they touch you, funny things happen to your car, no matter the speed. I like the agressive nature of the AI, I just dont like the physics of the cars when they touch, not every situation should end up like a 'feather in a hurricane'. But I am hoping that gets fixed with a patch.
Well said, brambos. I agree on all points, altho I don't consider any of them to be negative.
While I do agree that the AI in S2U makes for some interesting races, the argument that beating the AI in GT5 is too easy is completely absurd. They run near-perfect on every lap, with the exception of a couple sore spots at Nurb GP, Grand Valley, etcetera, and are incredibly tough to beat in comparably equipped cars. Leaving the outcome of my race up to the chance occurance of the AI hitting a wall doesn't excite me. If I want that kind of racing, I can go online.
seriously? their apex speed with sports soft is what I do with sports hard. I am constantly 3 second or so quicker than the AI over one lap in equal cars.
Have to agree with this. GT5 Ai are painfully slow, I'm not a massive fan of the AI in Shift 2, but they are a lot damn faster than the GT5 AI (If still a little too slow). They corner so slowly in GT5 that in order to have a decent race you often need to use a slower car than the AI.
GT5 races are really competitive. When you have 100 BHP less, are on Comfort Softs, and you let them get 1.30 seconds ahead of you before you go....
JJ72seriously? their apex speed with sports soft is what I do with sports hard. I am constantly 3 second or so quicker than the AI over one lap in equal cars.
Good for you, sir. I'm not, apparently. And what race was this in which the AI was confirmed to be on sports soft? If it's not too much trouble, of course.
JJ72The Infamous Seasonal race #2, Focus ST on Madrid, where the lead car has tires two tier above yours, and you have to make up a 20 sec gap in 5 laps? I won that.
And pretty much on every A-apec race I have to run lesser tires to keep the race close, you can see what tire the AI runs in replays.