- 2,266
- GTP_Thatman/Thatmanthere
- A Man Hamster
I Was wondering why there isnt a place with all of the interiors we have here at GTP....there was an ugliest thread and a guess that interior thread but not so much a "what your cars interior look like" thread so here is one now.
Please post your car's interior and discuss what you like and don't like about it....
1987 Mazda Rx7
I like what Mazda did, Put the tach HUGE right in the middle. The other information is pretty straight forward but I wouldn't like the fact that on the turbo model they swap out the battery meter. However I didnt like how close the e=brake was so close to the steering wheel(relatively speaking) and thats why a smaller wheel was in order.
The seats are thin but hug you quite well.(though I've never sat in racing seats) The shifter is exactly where it should be and easy in reach, however if you have a passenger often when shifting into 5th will hit their leg.
Then the mirror controls are a little weird being in the center but nothing to really complain about. However the idiot light cluster being kind of where the sun hits gets annoying at times but hey thats why they changed it.
And the back seats...... I actually have sat in them....with a person in the passenger seat. Not as good as the eclipse but um they are okay-ish?
1989 Buick Park Avenue
So Buick's flagship car, though not the ultra model that give it a few extra amenities that my model doesn't have it has a okay layout. Very square and straightforward. I didnt get why they have 2 "information centers". I also dont like that there isnt a tach, but that was also fixed in the next iteration of the car. Well that and the speedometer only goes to 85.
The build quality all seems very solid and the steering wheel is just nice...I really like it. But the climate control center can be troublesome because the steering wheel covers a fair amount of the buttons(if you can even call them that)
The backseats are for obvious reasons leaps and bounds more comfy.
They even both feature lighters so that you can plug stuff in them.
1990 Mitsubishi Eclipse
Aww the eclipse, its good. Well to a point obviously. The car feels big on the inside and the shifter is in a really nice position. The plastics used were average and not bad overall. Then the tach and speedometer are in okay places but certainly do a good job of telling me information.(well not this car though)
And I love the center console...there is just a heck of a lot of space in there!
Then the back seats are snug and fit very well.
1994 Chevrolet Astro van
Well first of all.
Its a van, and....the pedals are very close.
I dont like it. Then again its not mine.
2006 Chevrolet Cobalt
Car interiors have gone downhill haven't they?
The cheap plastic in this car is but certainly when driving it the position can be nice and comfortable. Other then that the seats, ALL IF THEM, are kind of like sitting on boards...
Well thats about what there is that I drive. Not all are mine but meh.
Like I said dont think this thread has been around before so yeah.
On a side note I know a lot isnt super comprehensive either.
Please post your car's interior and discuss what you like and don't like about it....
1987 Mazda Rx7
I like what Mazda did, Put the tach HUGE right in the middle. The other information is pretty straight forward but I wouldn't like the fact that on the turbo model they swap out the battery meter. However I didnt like how close the e=brake was so close to the steering wheel(relatively speaking) and thats why a smaller wheel was in order.
The seats are thin but hug you quite well.(though I've never sat in racing seats) The shifter is exactly where it should be and easy in reach, however if you have a passenger often when shifting into 5th will hit their leg.
Then the mirror controls are a little weird being in the center but nothing to really complain about. However the idiot light cluster being kind of where the sun hits gets annoying at times but hey thats why they changed it.
And the back seats...... I actually have sat in them....with a person in the passenger seat. Not as good as the eclipse but um they are okay-ish?
1989 Buick Park Avenue
So Buick's flagship car, though not the ultra model that give it a few extra amenities that my model doesn't have it has a okay layout. Very square and straightforward. I didnt get why they have 2 "information centers". I also dont like that there isnt a tach, but that was also fixed in the next iteration of the car. Well that and the speedometer only goes to 85.
The build quality all seems very solid and the steering wheel is just nice...I really like it. But the climate control center can be troublesome because the steering wheel covers a fair amount of the buttons(if you can even call them that)
The backseats are for obvious reasons leaps and bounds more comfy.
They even both feature lighters so that you can plug stuff in them.
1990 Mitsubishi Eclipse
Aww the eclipse, its good. Well to a point obviously. The car feels big on the inside and the shifter is in a really nice position. The plastics used were average and not bad overall. Then the tach and speedometer are in okay places but certainly do a good job of telling me information.(well not this car though)
And I love the center console...there is just a heck of a lot of space in there!
Then the back seats are snug and fit very well.
1994 Chevrolet Astro van
Well first of all.
Its a van, and....the pedals are very close.
I dont like it. Then again its not mine.
2006 Chevrolet Cobalt
Car interiors have gone downhill haven't they?
The cheap plastic in this car is but certainly when driving it the position can be nice and comfortable. Other then that the seats, ALL IF THEM, are kind of like sitting on boards...
Well thats about what there is that I drive. Not all are mine but meh.
Like I said dont think this thread has been around before so yeah.
On a side note I know a lot isnt super comprehensive either.