OK its taken me a few days to get sorted out after the holiday (which was most enjoyable), but here are a few quick (and crappy) pictures..
How the rack looks now, one black box replaced with a slightly bigger and better looking black box...
A closer look at the 1909
The display, showing the input channels on the left and output on the right
The1909 has highlighted just how big a weak spot the old Sony was. Its is as if I have changed my speakers, the difference is that large.
The size and depth of the soundfield has increased massively, the sound quality is a huge leap forward and my sub has been given a new lease of life.
I have spent the weekend re-watching old favorites and have to say it was £450 well spent.
I also have to say hats off to Sevenoakes (my local Denon dealer), they were great from enquiry to demo to sale. The 606 I demoed the 1909 against comes close, but the £50 difference was well worth it, the 1909 looses nothing in terms of audio delivery, but does so in a far more effortless manner (but not lazy) and has a final depth that the Onkyo lacks.
Set-up was a doddle thanks to the Audyssey Dynamic EQ system, while taking six sets of measurements took a while, the end result was stunning and I've been personally amazed that I have not felt the need to play around with any of the channel levels at all. The on-screen menus are text based and very 'low-tech' but do the job prefectly well. The Audyssey Dynamic Volume system also works excellently, smoothing out volume levels so that you get no jump to a stupidly high volume as soon as adverts come on; even with Living TV (one of the worst culprits in my opinion) it works faultlessly.
I've also been very, very impressed with the 1909's ability to process stereo sound via Pro-logic II and DTS Neo, my previous experience with both these systems has been that while they are better than a raw stereo track the results could be poor, particularly with rear channels. The 1909 is a revelation in this area, with both Pro Logic II and DTS Neo delivering a convincing sound field from a stereo input.
More pictures will follow when I can stop watching stuff and be bothered to try a little harder, but I would strongly recomend the 1909 to anyone looking at a £450-ish receiver.
Regards
Scaff