Avid Racing Factory [UPDATED 01/02/11]

  • Thread starter vett'e
  • 332 comments
  • 408,845 views
Well, still equipped with the original set-up, I ran about 20 laps, and the best time I could pull off was 1:50.825. Give me a bit more turn in the center and I might be able to break into the 49's, but I wouldn't hold my breath, lol. This track is not among my favorites, as for some reason I have a hard time negotiating a handful of the turns, regardless of how many times I repeat them. :(
It did run a 1:05.618 at Deep Valley though!
 
Well, still equipped with the original set-up, I ran about 20 laps, and the best time I could pull off was 1:50.825. Give me a bit more turn in the center and I might be able to break into the 49's, but I wouldn't hold my breath, lol. This track is not among my favorites, as for some reason I have a hard time negotiating a handful of the turns, regardless of how many times I repeat them. :(
It did run a 1:05.618 at Deep Valley though!

Latest set up far surpasses original by a large margin in term of handling, feedback and also lap times. Give the new tune s try :P
 
Toyota Supra 3.0GT Turbo A '88

This car is specially tuned for our in-house tester (you know who you are). It was an outstanding car with very neutral handling prior to tweaking, and its still retained that pureness but with additional agility. On first impressions, the car was hesitant on turn in, and would swerve outwards when accelerating. The latter was remedied by increasing loading the LSD with higher values of initial torque so the outside wheels do work to 'push' the car to the desired line.

Spring rates and dampers were both bumped-up relative to each other bearing in mind weight distribution. The car's factory installed anti-roll bars were no longer sufficient, so again they were strengthened but with a stiffer rear.

The car doesn't roll very much, so not much camber was needed. Some front-toe was added for better response on turn-in and rear-toe in seemed to improve the responsiveness in mid-corner. The car over-steers slightly on during transition from corner to exit, so caution is required not to depress the throttle too much.

Last but not least, the overall ride height was dropped by 18mm and brakes set for front bias to give the car the stopping power it ought to have.

Requirements:
-All body upgrades (struts are optional here, some people don't like them)
-All engine upgrades inclusive of ECU
-All Intake Systems upgrade
-All Exhaust upgrades
-Stage 1 turbo (I don't recommend installing after market turbo chargers, the factory installed works perfectly in tandem with the chassis. The addition of more power dilutes the car's handling)
-Fully adjustable tranny
-Limited Slip Differential (MUST HAVE) and everything else purchasable from drive train section
-Fully adjustable suspension
-Racing hard tires (I recommend Racing hard or Sports Soft to truly feel the car, anything more is overkill)
-No wing installed (it looked too ugly to be worn by the Supra)

Toyota Supra 3.0GT Turbo A '88
HP: 420 (no after-market turbo chargers)
Curb Mass: 1239 kg
Weight Distribution: 54 / 46

Aerodynamics: -- / -- (no wing here, not for this car)
Transmission: 240 km (good for Suzuka F1 circuit)
Initial Torque: 24
Acceleration Sensitivity: 36
Braking Sensitivity: 20
Ride Height: -18 / -18
Spring Rate: 16.6 / 14.3
Extension: 8 / 7
Compression: 8 / 7
Anti-roll Bars: 4 / 6
Camber Angle (-): 2.6 / 2.2
Toe: -0.13 / 0.10
Brake Balance: 7 / 4

This car doesn't merely receive enough attention as it ought to have. I overlooked its prowess before and often looked to other cars, but boy do I feel like a fool now!

I strongly recommend this car to anyone with a taste for retro Japanese cars. This one will go down in history, yet give modern cars a run for its money.

GO GET ONE NOW!

Enjoy.
 
Last edited:
Thank you very much vette! I'm so happy that you took on my request.

I'll be testing this setup when I get home. Once again, thank you.
 
I just bought a Gillet Vertigo race car, and I was having a hard time steering with it. I fooled around with it and made it better by changing roll bars and dampers, dont really know what im doing, but it is a little better :)
I was hoping you guys might be able to tune it for me, if you could that would be awesome!
 
Yes J, your request is accepted. However, that would have to wait until Avid has enough funds to buy the car. Unless you would like to send it to us instead.

Thanks
 
I need some tunes for running these and other fast cars on Daytona. I can see that what you are doing makes them stick like glue on twisting maps, but when I like to have fun, I like to go to the Daytona map and floor it. And if you guys can come up with a tune to make that GT Citeroen win, wow, that would be impressive. It is just too slow. 👍
 
Hi Slick, again all requests are accepted predicated on the fact that Avid has enough funds to buy the car, unless a third party or yourself would like to temporarily hand us one instead.

Thanks
 
Pagani Zonda R '09

I don't think many words come close to describing the sensation when driving this car. Its a pantomime in its own right, but beneath the skin lies something very very visceral - its raw power will devour you if you make the slightest mistake. Nevertheless, this car has some outstanding performance right out of the box, I was stunned by its pure speed and very neutral balance through corners.

However, the mountain of torque and power meant throttle control had to be as precise as a surgeon, if you're not using a wheel or anything beyond a standard controller, it may prove difficult to actually pilot this thing around corners without spinning out in a flurry of screams and spasm. The most alarming issue I found was exit-oversteer, and though turn-in response was good it did however seem reluctant on entry.

The first was rectified by adjusting the LSD for a lower acceleration sensitivity, to compensate the initial torque was raised so the pre-load would stay similar. Braking was also improved by increasing decelerating sensitivity.

The latter was rectified by dropping the front ride height slightly more than the rear. Overall agility was improved by increasing spring rates and turning up the dampers. The factory installed anti-roll bars were adequate on undulating corners, but hindered the car's performance on tight hairpins or chicanes, so they were remedied by stronger after-market parts; with a rear bias.

The car is very rigid by nature, so not much camber adjustments were needed. That said, some negative camber was still added for improved grip through corners and some toe-out was introduced for better turn-in response.

The result of all this means the car retains its neutral attributes, but it is now easier to apply throttle through the corners and the risk of a spin-out is reduced.

Pagani Zonda R '09
HP: 725
Curb Mass: 1070 kg


Requirements:
-can be purchased at the dealers on won from B-spec Professional
-the car is COMPLETELY stock (I saw absolutely no need for further modifications)
-racing hard tires came a standard with the car, no need for purchasing

Aerodynamics: 38 / 56
Initial Torque: -- / 28
Acceleration Sensitivity: -- / 18
Braking Sensitivity: -- / 25
Ride Height: -20 / -17
Spring Rate: 15.5 / 17.6
Extension: 7 / 7
Compression: 6 / 6
Anti-roll Bars: 5 / 6
Camber Angle (-): 2.6 / 2.2
Toe Angle: -0.14 / 0.13
Brake Balance: 8 / 6

All testing was conducted on Suzuka, Personal Best is 1:56:619 with exact specifications from above. Had I modified the engine to give more HP and swapped for some slicks, then we can expect times comparable to the ZR-1 even.

Enjoy!
 
Hi Slick, again all requests are accepted predicated on the fact that Avid has enough funds to buy the car, unless a third party or yourself would like to temporarily hand us one instead.

Thanks

Cool. Do you have a tune for racing Daytona with the GT-R '09??? This would be geared toward the best top end speed. Thanks!
 
I am an absolute fan of you tunes, every single time they amaze me, when i head out to an online lobby.I love the fact you don't just tune them supercars, cause i'm not a fan of those. All i wanna say is thank you for you commitment en keep them tunes comin please.
 
Thank you Freerun,

It is our fans support that urges us to continue making new tunes. We wish you a Merry Christmas and Happy New Year.

Cheers
 
Pagani Zonda R '09

I don't think many words come close to describing the sensation when driving this car. Its a pantomime in its own right, but beneath the skin lies something very very visceral - its raw power will devour you if you make the slightest mistake. Nevertheless, this car has some outstanding performance right out of the box, I was stunned by its pure speed and very neutral balance through corners.

However, the mountain of torque and power meant throttle control had to be as precise as a surgeon, if you're not using a wheel or anything beyond a standard controller, it may prove difficult to actually pilot this thing around corners without spinning out in a flurry of screams and spasm. The most alarming issue I found was exit-oversteer, and though turn-in response was good it did however seem reluctant on entry.

The first was rectified by adjusting the LSD for a lower acceleration sensitivity, to compensate the initial torque was raised so the pre-load would stay similar. Braking was also improved by increasing decelerating sensitivity.

The latter was rectified by dropping the front ride height slightly more than the rear. Overall agility was improved by increasing spring rates and turning up the dampers. The factory installed anti-roll bars were adequate on undulating corners, but hindered the car's performance on tight hairpins or chicanes, so they were remedied by stronger after-market parts; with a rear bias.

The car is very rigid by nature, so not much camber adjustments were needed. That said, some negative camber was still added for improved grip through corners and some toe-out was introduced for better turn-in response.

The result of all this means the car retains its neutral attributes, but it is now easier to apply throttle through the corners and the risk of a spin-out is reduced.

Pagani Zonda R '09
HP: 725
Curb Mass: 1070 kg


Requirements:
-can be purchased at the dealers on won from B-spec Professional
-the car is COMPLETELY stock (I saw absolutely no need for further modifications)
-racing hard tires came a standard with the car, no need for purchasing

Aerodynamics: 38 / 56
Initial Torque: -- / 28
Acceleration Sensitivity: -- / 18
Braking Sensitivity: -- / 25
Ride Height: -20 / -17
Spring Rate: 15.5 / 17.6
Extension: 7 / 7
Compression: 6 / 6
Anti-roll Bars: 5 / 6
Camber Angle (-): 2.6 / 2.2
Toe Angle: -0.14 / 0.13
Brake Balance: 8 / 6

All testing was conducted on Suzuka, Personal Best is 1:56:619 with exact specifications from above. Had I modified the engine to give more HP and swapped for some slicks, then we can expect times comparable to the ZR-1 even.

Enjoy!




Still can't get this car to agree with me. I've been running this tune tonight with my Zonda, but I keep getting oversteer on corner exit, and I'd also like to know if you are using ABS with those brake settings. I'm locking up real easy without using ABS. Still trying to decide what I make of this tune, because some on some corners it seems to exit a bit faster and with more stability, but others are still just as out of control as ever. Nature of the beast I suppose.
 
Ferrari F40 '92

The F40 represents the essence of what a Ferrari is, and how it ought to drive. Although made in the 90s, it has outstanding performance through the bends and a bucket full of power to propel it in the straights. The lack of any driver aids made the initial testing a little unnerving, although turning was very predictable it did slightly over-steer on lift off. Furthermore, throttle control had to be precise or one would expect to see either the front or rear buried in someone else's car or worse a freaking wall!

The car boats a very well balanced chassis, it is especially excellent at mid corners and the transition to exiting. The car did slide slightly to the outside, but that was a minor issue quickly addressed by tweaking the differential. However, the Ferrari didn't feel aggressive enough, and lacked the urgency on turn-in.

As mentioned, the differential was tweaked so the initial torque is higher, whilst the sensitivity to acceleration dropped to allow better throttle control. Braking sensitivity was also upped to aid braking stability - particularly through S-curves. Brake balance was set with front bias and top speed was dropped to 300 km/h for better acceleration and response through corners.

Next the car's spring and dampers were stiffened to keep sliding in check, whilst stronger anti-roll bars were fitted for improved turn-in. Some negative camber and toe-out at the front also helped improve the lack of urgency inherent to the car. Lastly, the overall ride-height was dropped to reduce weight transfer and improve handling characteristics as a whole.

Ferrari F40 '92
HP: 649
Curb Mass: 1125
Weight Distribution: 42/57


Requirements:
-Weight Reduction Stage 3
-Chassis Reinforcements
-Engine Tuning Stage 3
-ECU Tuning
-Sports Intake Manifold
-Racing Air Filter
-Sports Exhaust
-Catalytic Converter: Sports
-Titanium Racing Exhaust
-High Pressure Turbo Kit
-Fully Customizable Transmission
-Limited Slip Differential
-Twin-Plate Clutch
-Semi-Racing Flywheel
-Fully adjustable Suspension
-Racing Hard tires


Aerodynamics: -- / --
Transmission: 300 km
Initial Torque: -- / 32
Acceleration Sensitivity: -- / 26
Braking Sensitivity: -- / 32
Ride Height: 16 / 14
Spring Rate: 12.7 / 13.9
Extension: 7 / 7
Compression: 6 / 6
Anti-roll Bars: 6 / 6
Camber Angle (-): 2.4 / 1.8
Toe Angle: -0.14 / 0.10
Brake Balance: 8 / 6

You better be awake to drive this car.

Enjoy!
 
Last edited:
Still can't get this car to agree with me. I've been running this tune tonight with my Zonda, but I keep getting oversteer on corner exit, and I'd also like to know if you are using ABS with those brake settings. I'm locking up real easy without using ABS. Still trying to decide what I make of this tune, because some on some corners it seems to exit a bit faster and with more stability, but others are still just as out of control as ever. Nature of the beast I suppose.

Throttle control is essential, I'm using a wheel and pedal set so its relatively easy for me to gauge the throttle. Anyhow, I doubt changing and suspension setting will eliminate the exit over-steer because there is simply too much torque going through the rears. If you are struggling with throttle control, I recommend lowering acceleration sensitivity.


The car will behave as long as you treat it with respect, the throttle isn't an on-off switch!

BTW. What sort of times are you getting on Suzuka? If I can do a 1:56.619 then so should you. Bare in mind that only racing hard tires were used, had I used slicks then I can definitely foresee times as quick as a ZR-1 RM, maybe a little slower but nonetheless on par with it.


Cheers
 
Still can't get this car to agree with me. I've been running this tune tonight with my Zonda, but I keep getting oversteer on corner exit, and I'd also like to know if you are using ABS with those brake settings. I'm locking up real easy without using ABS. Still trying to decide what I make of this tune, because some on some corners it seems to exit a bit faster and with more stability, but others are still just as out of control as ever. Nature of the beast I suppose.

May need to fine tune the LSD for your driving style.
 
Hey fellas, I messed around with it a bit more and I just think it's a sensitive beast. Like you said, I think it's all in the throttle, but the car frustrates me because it's so prone to lose the rear end if you goose it at all that I end up losing time because I'm babying it so much. There's a very fine balance with this one for sure. I'll try adjusting some LSD settings if I really think I need to, and once I really get to know the car a bit more I'll see what kind of times I can pull on Suzuka. I'll try to get back to you tomorrow with some more feedback. Thanks for your efforts!
 
Maybe Suzuka isn't my course, but I've been running it for at least 45 minutes straight now, and I'm struggling to get even close to breaking 2:00. 2:06 has been my best time, and that's using your tune and hard racing tires. I also just got a wheel, but I don't think I'm driving any poorer than I would be with a controller. If anything, I'm much more sensitive to the gas and brakes.

But again about the brakes, I just think they're way too hot. I'd really like to know what TCS and ABS you are using with this tune. I don't use assists, and I'm telling you that I am feathering the brake, and you cannot brake in a turn with these settings or the car will come out from underneath you. All of the braking has to be done on the straight before you enter the corner. Maybe that's your driving style and there's nothing wrong with it, but I'm really trying to stick with your settings here for the purpose of testing the tune and that's what I'm experiencing. I'll keep at it some more tonight and tomorrow. That's my update for now.



2 edits:

1. I shouldn't say you can't brake in a turn with these brake settings, because you can, but you are extremely likely to start drifting and you must be good at controlling that to stay on the track.

2. I just ran a very solid lap and pulled 2:04:368, and I honestly don't believe that you ran a 1:56 on Suzuka with this car and the tune you posted. I'll have to see video to believe it, because I simply don't believe that you can improve 8 seconds on the lap I just ran. That's not a knock, and I'm not calling you a liar. I'm just giving honest feedback pertaining to how I'm perceiving the post. I have nothing against you or the tune, I just don't know what else to say about what you've said and how I'm seeing it play out on the track.


As far as using the tune goes, I strongly suggest that the LSD and brake settings be taken into consideration and set up to personalize the individual's driving style. Other than that, I do think that your tune does do a bit to counteract the tendency for the slip and slide of the Zonda, which in the end is still always going to be an acceleration beast you're going to have to tame to get the best results from. Again, appreciate your work.

I think I don't really like the Zonda though. :) Have you ever seen online races with this car? I call it "pile up in the grass".
 
Last edited:
Chevrolet Corvette ZR1 (C6) RM '09

Well this is hands down the one of the best close-wheel racer money can buy. Not many cars even come remotely close! There have been many tunes of this car already, but this being the first few cars I bought, I took the liberty of enhancing what was already a beast into a menace.

Chevrolet Corvette ZR1 (C6) RM '09
HP: 905
Curb Mass: 1100 kg
Weight Distribution: 52 / 48


Requirements:
*Race Modification
*Every other upgrade available; purchase some racing soft and sports soft.

Aerodynamics: 34 / 46
Transmission: 360
Initial Torque: 22
Acceleration Sensitivity: 40
Braking Sensitivity: 34
Ride Height: 1 / 1
Spring Rate: 16.5 / 15.1 (Racing Soft)
Extension: 9 / 9
Damperes: 8 / 8
Anti-roll Bars: 4 / 6
Camber: 2.8 / 2.3
Toe: -0.13 / -0.06
Brake Balance: 7 / 4

Enjoy!

Okay... Back from the Holidays, ready to give Gran Turismo All Stars another shot in the Vette with your updated tune.

Track 1: Trial Mountain - Best Lap 1:18.929 (Old Tune - 1:19.683)
Entry: No complaints here, car feels solid and actually turns in better than before, allowing me to enter slightly later, and still make an effective angle. Car seems to turn tighter and quicker.

Middle: No more understeer! Not only is the understeer gone, but the overall balance and stability of the car is considerably better than it was previously. Car rotates very well under brake and coast conditions. Patience still pays when getting back to the throttle, but as long as you hit your marks the middle of the corner is fantastic.

Exit: The new and improved handling through the center allows the car to rotate earlier, with a far more stable feeling. This allows me to get on the throttle sooner than previously, helping with drive off, traction, straight away speeds, and lap times in general. I must admit, that I did make some LSD changes, as recommended by 'Thunderstruck' after some online testing laps. The final settings, that allow me to get on the throttle with a lot less fear are 5, 10 & 38 respectively. (I might go up on the init/accel a little bit with time.)

Overall: Much, much better for me throughout every point of the track. The most noteable change, outside of the corrected understeer issue I had previously, is the cars stability, which translates to dramatic increases to consistency for me. The car is no longer 'on the edge' which allows some forgiveness. In a 10 lap race, 5 race series, this becomes a key factor. I've ran this series at least 5 times previously and have failed all of them, due to driver error, combined with a tune that didn't promote my driving style. In those previous attempts, I was always able to get to the front, but absolutely could not hold it together, mistake free, for the duration of the race, which always cost me the Gold, and in the end, the series. If anything, you could add a little bit more turn, or free up the car a bit, to give it just a little extra bite when you need it.

Grand Valley - Best Lap - 1:43.329 (Old Tune 1:44.244)
Well, as I described on the last track, the car was extremely balanced and stable. So, when we head to a track with higher entry speeds, and tighter corners, this usually translates into a slight understeer issue, and this was no exception. Don't get me wrong, it was leaps and bounds ahead of the previous tune, allowing me to cut 9 tenths off my lap time. But I did experience some understeer from the center out on this track. This tune and car, when on this track becomes a coasters dream. If you like to make a moderate entry, meaning middle of the road, between aggressive and modest, just a solid, strong entry, then coast through the turn, waiting for the perfect time, to hit the gas and drive away, this tune has the ability. I found myself comfortably out front, but that R92CP Race Car never left my rear view, with the 787B tucked in right behind him. The tune is comfortably capable of winning, if you stay clean and smooth.

Green Monster, the ring... 6:34.397... (Old - 7:01:931)
This is where we see, all of the increased control and stability reap rewards. The car still hates bumps even at 16 / 15 ride height.
Had I used the proper gearing for the final straight away, I probably could have pulled this one off. But 4th place here and will probably crush the series hopes, due to the R92CP running 2, 1, 1 so far to my 1, 2, 4, leaving me 50 points back. I'd need to win the next 2 in a row, with him finishing 3rd at least once to pull it off. Which wouldn't be so horrible, if he didn't start in P1 every f#%$ing track. Either that, or I need to go out of my way, to force him off the track early and try to win that way, but it almost always results in me taking myself out. I'm going to break down, and use a different car :(

The ring - 2:23.534
The one and only part of this track I like, is the big down hill spiral. Other than that, I dislike this track. Higher Speed and lower banking corners magnified the issues I had at Grand Valley, and made the car feel like the old tune again. Just not enough turn through the center and out. Understeer monster for me on this track. I'm sorry to say, I hated this tune on this track. 4th place finish, game over series.

All in all, this tune is great, I just need to find a way to fine tune it, to suit my personal needs. Great update though, without a doubt. Thanks again for taking my review into consideration and I'm glad to see it help your tunes progress in a positive direction.
 
Maybe Suzuka isn't my course, but I've been running it for at least 45 minutes straight now, and I'm struggling to get even close to breaking 2:00. 2:06 has been my best time, and that's using your tune and hard racing tires. I also just got a wheel, but I don't think I'm driving any poorer than I would be with a controller. If anything, I'm much more sensitive to the gas and brakes.

But again about the brakes, I just think they're way too hot. I'd really like to know what TCS and ABS you are using with this tune. I don't use assists, and I'm telling you that I am feathering the brake, and you cannot brake in a turn with these settings or the car will come out from underneath you. All of the braking has to be done on the straight before you enter the corner. Maybe that's your driving style and there's nothing wrong with it, but I'm really trying to stick with your settings here for the purpose of testing the tune and that's what I'm experiencing. I'll keep at it some more tonight and tomorrow. That's my update for now.



2 edits:

1. I shouldn't say you can't brake in a turn with these brake settings, because you can, but you are extremely likely to start drifting and you must be good at controlling that to stay on the track.

2. I just ran a very solid lap and pulled 2:04:368, and I honestly don't believe that you ran a 1:56 on Suzuka with this car and the tune you posted. I'll have to see video to believe it, because I simply don't believe that you can improve 8 seconds on the lap I just ran. That's not a knock, and I'm not calling you a liar. I'm just giving honest feedback pertaining to how I'm perceiving the post. I have nothing against you or the tune, I just don't know what else to say about what you've said and how I'm seeing it play out on the track.


As far as using the tune goes, I strongly suggest that the LSD and brake settings be taken into consideration and set up to personalize the individual's driving style. Other than that, I do think that your tune does do a bit to counteract the tendency for the slip and slide of the Zonda, which in the end is still always going to be an acceleration beast you're going to have to tame to get the best results from. Again, appreciate your work.

I think I don't really like the Zonda though. :) Have you ever seen online races with this car? I call it "pile up in the grass".

Hi, sorry for the delay, all aids are off except for ABS at 1. All lap times posted here (by me at least) are sound and are by no means conjured to win a following. I shall post a video if possible on youtube or at least a photo as proof. For kicks I'll also try running with slicks to see how it goes up against the ZR-1.

BTW. 8 seconds can be lost or gained mostly in the beginning of section 1 and towards the end of section 2. Racing line and FULL THROTTLE in those sections are paramount in achieving a quick lap, my ZR-1 can do a 1:49:225 (or 522?). Suzuka is my home so I know it pretty well, only practice can make perfect.

On a last note, you may have noticed that above the tunes on the homepage lie a disclaimer. I advise everyone including yourself to read that first!!! =)

Thanks!
 
Last edited:
For all those skeptics! Here is a video on youtube showing my lap of the Suzuka F1 circuit on racing hard tires and exact specifications from above.

I apologize for the poor quality of the video, but this was the quickest and most convenient way for me. The best lap reads 1:56.978, but the actual recorded lap did a 1:56.750

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s-J-eJT3D_4

Thanks!
 
1. Hi, sorry for the delay, all aids are off except for ABS at 1.

2. BTW. 8 seconds can be lost or gained mostly in the beginning of section 1 and towards the end of section 2. Racing line and FULL THROTTLE in those sections are paramount in achieving a quick lap

3. On a last note, you may have noticed that above the tunes on the homepage lie a disclaimer. I advise everyone including yourself to read that first!!! =)

Thanks!


1. Thanks for clearing that up.

2. This sounds like the area where I would possibly be able to make up time. I noticed that I'm always at 1:56 when I exit the very last sharp turn on the course. I'll play around some more for fun.

3. Yes, I saw that. :)



Thanks for the video. This might be a lame request, and you are by no means obliged to humor it if it's too much trouble, but I'd really like to see the replay from hood/roof cam since that's what I use. The lap time isn't the issue, I'd actually just like a Suzuka lesson at this point. From that camera angle in the video replay it doesn't look like you're driving any differently than I would be, at least not 8 seconds faster for sure. I think the differences would be more apparent in hood/roof cam. Again, lot of work put in here and I appreciate it. Great job guys in contributing to the community. :dopey:
 
NSXR02

I have had this car in my garage for a couple of days and only now had an opportunity to use it. I fashioned the parts and tune and ran a few laps on Suzuka.

Sticky is the word that comes to mind when driving this car. Grip in the entry, mid and exit who could ask for more. Now I know that the NSX has always had a reputation for grip so what's the big deal? Well after doing 3 laps and netting a time of 2:05.7xx I was pretty pleased. Sport mediums held my rims in contact with the road and the car, and tune, responded beautifully.

I consider this track a momentum track. That means that if you can't maintain a cars right and left shift you will not do well on this course. The NSX had no problem. Well done AVID in taking something that was great and making it splendid.
 
I don't usually join sites but I had to say thank you for your ZR1 tune. I've tried, for the better part of 2 days, to beat the US Championship in B-Spec, nothing would work. I tried your tune and M. Perrone currently has a +9.005 lead with 2 laps to go.

You are definitely getting bookmarked!
 
1. Thanks for clearing that up.

2. This sounds like the area where I would possibly be able to make up time. I noticed that I'm always at 1:56 when I exit the very last sharp turn on the course. I'll play around some more for fun.

3. Yes, I saw that. :)



Thanks for the video. This might be a lame request, and you are by no means obliged to humor it if it's too much trouble, but I'd really like to see the replay from hood/roof cam since that's what I use. The lap time isn't the issue, I'd actually just like a Suzuka lesson at this point. From that camera angle in the video replay it doesn't look like you're driving any differently than I would be, at least not 8 seconds faster for sure. I think the differences would be more apparent in hood/roof cam. Again, lot of work put in here and I appreciate it. Great job guys in contributing to the community. :dopey:

Uh-ohh. The problem is I don't save replays unless they're like blistering fast, and at times I even forget. That aside, all my lap records are currently held by the ZR-1 hitting suzuka with a 1:49.xxx and even those don't have replays! Haha I'll see what I can do though, but 8 seconds is fairly achievable once you get the racing line rights through the S-curves on sector 1 and the last stretch on sector 2. With some practice I guarantee you will at least shave 5 seconds off your laps.

Lastly, I urge you to look at the replay again and observe how much throttle I'm using throughout the bends etc. I almost never lift off completely through most corners and also take note off where I cut the track to save time!

By the way, I also made a video of the Zonda lapping Suzuka on slicks, it achieved a time of 1:51.xxx on the FIRST try. I would have posted the video on youtube, but it took over 15 minutes to upload the first one so I had given up with the second. With some more fine tuning, I strongly believe that the Zonda can be a contender to the ZR-1's throne.

Cheers
 
Last edited:
By the way, I also made a video of the Zonda lapping Suzuka on slicks, it achieved a time of 1:51.xxx on the FIRST try. I would have posted the video on youtube, but it took over 15 minutes to upload the first one so I had given up with the second. With some more fine tuning, I strongly believe that the Zonda can be a contender to the ZR-1's throne.

Cheers

I agree the Zonda can do 1:51.xxx sorry for the large crappy picture.
IMG_7788.jpg
 
LOL HAHAHAHA THE PICTURE IS MASSIVE! I'm reading this off of my mobile and it took me a millennium to scroll right to see the times.

Good job Thunder! =)
 
Back