I iceboxed it.
Honestly, I don't care that it's "ugly," (So Is a Formula 1 car, for the same reason - aero,) fat (it doesn't drive it's weight,) and has had it's reputation ruined by one hoon on the internet who broke his transmission and decided to bitch about it. oh, and ricers. We can't forget the damage they do.
Seriously, It's Nissan trying to shake off the Rice-boy attitude with a car that delivers Turbo performance for Carrera prices. It still can't, for some reason. It's for this sort of reason I hate The Fast and the Furious. Now the Japanese can never be taken seriously in the international stage.
The GT-R also eschews style for Performance. It doesn't look good BECAUSE it goes fast. It's the Ultimate Engineering project...and you know Engineers do some stupid, illogical things. Think about it that way, and one can forgive putting launch control on the car. A stick might be more durable...or maybe not. Who's to say? Certainly won't be faster, as a Stick would lose time every shift, especially on a road course.
It's really not as huge as it looks. I've seen one in person...compared to a Challenger, it's rather tidy. It's probably not much bigger, or really, might be a little smaller than, the Camaro. It's the 4WD and Dual-Clutch that makes this car so heavy, but it's also that which makes the car so fast.
Nissan told their engineers, "Build a midsize coupe, and make it as fast as you can. You have an unlimited budget." That's exactly what they did. Too bad everyone hates it.
If only they made one in blue.