Anyone like conspiracy theories?

  • Thread starter arora
  • 96 comments
  • 9,780 views
arora

arora

(Banned)
4,098
Anyone like conspiracy theories?

So a lot of my friends are intrigued with things like; famous deaths that could be suspect, ways the government is trying to screw you, vaccines that cause autism, etc etc etc.

I'll start it out with some interesting information about Kurt Cobane a friend sent me, she has gathered lots of information, interviews documents and so forth.

www.youtube.com/goddessfourwinds
www.myspace.com/goddessfourwinds

www.cobaincase.com and www.justiceforkurt.com are the 2 major sites about kurt's death www.projectunplugged.com is another. Finding info about Lincoln and Kennedy deaths could be fun also.

I've been searching for information about 'secret' groups like the trilaterals, counsel on foreign relations, world banking. I'll see if I can get some links up if you all might have an interest.

So tell me all your theories the news does not want you to know (like how the power lines in my alley way are giving me cancer :P) Hope you have some fun or some serious conversation.

:cheers:
Erik
 
TinFoilHatArea.jpg


Had to be done.
 
Seriously, Solid. You're supposed to put the tin foil over your (and kitty's) mouth so you don't catch the Mexican swine flu. Living that close, you of all people should know that. :rolleyes:

:P
 
Living close to Roswell and the border I should pay more attention to you guys and your tinfoil :P

Here is something I have no idea how credible but fun anyway.....


THIS IS HARD TO BELIEVE!

History Mystery

Have a history teacher explain this----- if they can.

Abraham Lincoln was elected to Congress in 1846.
John F. Kennedy was elected to Congress in 1946.

Abraham Lincoln was elected President in 1860.
John F. Kennedy was elected President in 1960.

Both were particularly concerned with civil rights.
Both wives lost their children while living in the White House.

Both Presidents were shot on a Friday.
Both Presidents were shot in the head

Now it gets really weird.

Lincoln 's secretary was named Kennedy.
Kennedy's Secretary was named Lincoln .

Both were assassinated by Southerners.
Both were succeeded by Southerners named Johnson.

Andrew Johnson, who succeeded Lincoln, was born in 1808.
Lyndon Johnson, who succeeded Kennedy, was born in 1908.

John Wilkes Booth, who assassinated Lincoln, was born in 1839.

Lee Harvey Oswald, who assassinated Kennedy, was born
in 1939.

Both assassins were known by their three names.
Both names are composed of fifteen letters.

Now hang on to your seat.

Lincoln was shot at the theater named 'Ford'.
Kennedy was shot in a car called ' Lincoln ' made by 'Ford'.

Lincoln was shot in a theater and his assassin ran and hid in a warehouse.
Kennedy was shot from a warehouse and his assassin ran and hid in a theater.

Booth and Oswald were assassinated before their trials.

And here's the kicker...

A week before Lincoln was shot, he was in Monroe , Maryland
A week before Kennedy was shot, he was with Marilyn Monroe.
 
TB
Seriously, Solid. You're supposed to put the tin foil over your (and kitty's) mouth so you don't catch the Mexican swine flu. Living that close, you of all people should know that. :rolleyes:

:P
Click to expand...

Tried that. Kitty and me keep passing out! :indiff:
 
On the subject of Kennedy, aren't the papers behind the investigation of his death supposed to be released within a couple years to the public? I seem to recall there being a law/rule that after around 50 years, certain documents become available to the public eye.
 
Reventón;3379559
On the subject of Kennedy, aren't the papers behind the investigation of his death supposed to be released within a couple years to the public? I seem to recall there being a law/rule that after around 50 years, certain documents become available to the public eye.
Click to expand...
I thought that was 70 years?
 
A week before Kennedy was shot, he was with in Marilyn Monroe.
Click to expand...
TheCracker
Fixed ;)
Click to expand...
:lol:

I certainly hope he wasn't, though - considering she'd been dead for over a year :ill:

Marilyn Monroe (1 June 1926 – 5 August 1962)
John Fitzgerald "Jack" Kennedy (May 29, 1917 – November 22, 1963)
 
Touring Mars
:lol:

I certainly hope he wasn't, though - considering she'd been dead for over a year :ill:

Marilyn Monroe (1 June 1926 – 5 August 1962)
John Fitzgerald "Jack" Kennedy (May 29, 1917 – November 22, 1963)
Click to expand...

Well Touring Mars just relieved himself all over that theory. 👍
I find some of it interesting as an 'alternative viewpoint' and I enjoy reading sites like ATS and watching their videos, but most of the time I choose not to believe it.
 
Touring Mars
:lol:

I certainly hope he wasn't, though - considering she'd been dead for over a year :ill:

Marilyn Monroe (1 June 1926 – 5 August 1962)
John Fitzgerald "Jack" Kennedy (May 29, 1917 – November 22, 1963)
Click to expand...

Probably wouldn't be that surprising with Kennedy.
 
Nah, I think "anything with a pulse" was more his style.
 
Reventón;3379559
On the subject of Kennedy, aren't the papers behind the investigation of his death supposed to be released within a couple years to the public? I seem to recall there being a law/rule that after around 50 years, certain documents become available to the public eye.
Click to expand...

That's certainly the case in the UK. It's why dozens of documentaries on WWII came out in the mid nineties as all the official secrets etc were made public.

In fact, it appears the official secrets rule is only 30 years over here, and people even want to reduce that to 15 years.
 
Reventón;3379559
On the subject of Kennedy, aren't the papers behind the investigation of his death supposed to be released within a couple years to the public? I seem to recall there being a law/rule that after around 50 years, certain documents become available to the public eye.
Click to expand...

That is correct but they can be censored, take a look at the Roswell incident papers. There is quite a bit blacked out.

===

And yes I love a good conspiracy theory.
 
Agree to both Moglet's statements.

I think it could be a nuclear test, or crash/explosion of a nuclear powered prototype aircraft or weapon of some kind.


Who knows..... The bodily injuries are the eye poppers though, no 'man' could have done it.
 
Alot of people who buy into conspiracy theories have a tremendous lack of discriminatory power - they seem to accept that absolutely everything and anything is possible, that everything that happens has an unseen purpose or is being 'controlled' by an invisible hand, and that merely being able to imagine a scenario (whether even remotely possible or not) is enough to make that possibility as valid as any other. I find alot of it tiresome and frustrating - not just because I find certain specific conspiracy theories particularly offensive (9/11 "truthers", creationists), but mainly because I think it is a counterproductive and even dangerous way of thinking that ultimately leads to nowhere but confusion and unnecessary conflict.

The main objection I have with conspiracy theorists and contrarians in general is that it is almost impossible to argue with them - it takes no discipline or effort to be one, they do not burden themselves with the responsibilities of truthfulness or integrity, they require no evidence, they are intellectually lazy, they are often purposefully dishonest or deliberately obtuse, and seem to need nothing more than the conviction of their own correctness or reinforcement from others who happen to agree with them to justify their behaviour. Most frustrating of all, though, is that serious conspiracy theorists, like David Icke for example, are not 'stupid' or unable to reason - on the contrary, they are very capable of using powerful persuasive techniques, but choose to use the sum of their powers of reasoning and perception on what amounts to nothing more than mental masturbation.

The shame of conspiracy theories and those who persist in believing them even when they have been totally discredited is that they detract from genuine mysteries and the very real, honest scientific endeavor to learn about the unknown, and to understand/accept reality. Sadly, for some people, fiction will always be more exciting that fact...
 
Last edited:
Touring Mars
The shame of conspiracy theories and those who persist in believing them even when they have been totally discredited is that they detract from genuine mysteries and the very real, honest scientific endeavor to learn about the unknown, and to understand/accept reality. Sadly, for some people, fiction will always be more exciting that fact...
Click to expand...

I think that the best part of it is when you have the theory and you go searching for facts, and others opinion about those facts.

I love conspiracy theories, but I love even more to search more about them and the actual facts. It is something incredible 👍
 
I'd never heard of the Dyatlov Pass Incident. Weird indeed!
 

Similar threads

Sauc3
The reasons why Bush's government is corrupt
2
Replies
38
Views
2K
Solid Fro
Solid Fro

Latest Posts

Back