I think people are judging Shift based on GT5P/Forza 2 standards, which is not realistic in my opinion, or fair for that matter.
Well, the game did cost more than GT5P (30% more actually) so if I go by price then this game is a 2, maybe a 1, lol.
But seriously, I think it is completlely fair to compare two games that are of the same genre but of different styles, not for quality or realism, but for ease of use/how user friendly they are. This is my problem with NFSS, it is like a maze. I got a message from my friend last night and he asked me how to play multiplayer... this is unacceptable!
If you have to read the entire manual just to figure out what the hell is going on then something is wrong. I remember putting GT5P in and thinking this is weird, but it was still real easy to navigate and figure out what needed to be done to get the ball rolling, one could say. The realism, looks, and feel, are not comparable between the 2 games.
On the other hand, they are both racing games and every racing game should have certain elements. NFSS has these elements, and it is fun to play. Those two things are extremely important, and they need to have those two things (racing elements and fun factor) to a point where you dont want to stop playing. NFSS has achieved this, IMO.
In conclusion, when price, fun factor, ease of use, and addictability are all brought into consideration it is a 6-7, I think.
For comparison-Lets say GT5 cost $80. It will most likely be easy to navigate, really fun(more cars and tracks than NFSS), and I am already addicted to it and its not out yet. I am guessing GT5 will get a 9 out of 10 from me.
p.s. Carl- I watched a documentary on Rabbit Hash Kentucky, If you havent seen it you need to look it up, It is awesome!!
http://www.rabbithashthemovie.com/video.htm Just click on the picture. 4 hours from where I live, in the state Carl resides. This is an Epic movie, a must watch... for EVERYONE!