Car Design - Evolution, revolution or plagerism?

  • Thread starter Scaff
  • 55 comments
  • 3,208 views

Scaff

Moderator
29,780
United Kingdom
He/Him
ScaffUK
I have noticed that lately a number of threads in the Automotive forums have been dragged off topic with discussions about car design. Most start with discussions about the cars the threads relate to, but its very easy and natural for this to head rapidly off topic. Often to the detriment of the thread itself.

So in that vein I propose a thread dedicated to discussions of all Area's of Automotive design, a place in which opinions can be expressed and discussed.

As a starting topic how about one that I'm sure with split opinions.......




....Chris Bangle. His work includes the Fiat Coupe

fiat-coupe-f3q.jpg


he is often credited with flame surfacing

bmw-z4-coupe-front-733101.jpg


and then we have the 'bangle butt' that has been the subject of quite a bit of debate here at GTP over the last day or so

2006_BMW_6-series_M6_rear.jpg


So Chris Bangle, is his work attractive, is it even original, does it actually effect other designers?

Opinions, comments and no risk of running off topic (but please do remember the AUP), and of course any other automotive design related discussion is openly welcome.

Regards

Scaff
 
Continued from the A5 thread...



First, the only portion of your post with any real substance.

M5Power
According to you, these are the two characteristics of Chris Bangle's rear end design:

Instead blending the trunk into the rear of the car, the decklid has its a very strong character line that parallels the car's shoulder line.

The finishing touch of course, is the visual isolation of the trunk, giving the rear end of the car a very slab-sided look.

You know, it's kind of odd - I sort of remember that from somewhere:

Volvo-S60-hinten_high.jpg


According to you, that has every single aspect of the Bangle Butt. The trunk has a very strong character line that parallels the car's shoulder line, and the trunk is visually isolated from the taillights, albeit not in ths disgusting manner that Chris Bangle in which managed to **** it up. And the Volvo S60 shown came out in ... 2001. That happens to predate all of Bangle's incredibly crappy designs.

Take another look. Here is the 745i.

attachment.php


The red line is the high trunk line, which continues uninterrupted all the way to rear. The blue line is the shoulder line, which drops down into the trunk surround. This is how Bangle isolates the trunk.. by drawing a completely uninterrupted line from beginning to end.

Now here is the Volvo from a similar angle.

attachment.php


The red line stops at the tail light cluster (pink). The blue line stops there too.

Now this is my coworker's Camry.

attachment.php


Notice how in the Camry, the red line goes all the way around, just like the 7. And the blue line drops into the trunk surround.

The big difference between the 745 and the Camry is Toyota fixed the ungainliness of the trunk by breaking it up with the tail light cluster on both sides of the shoulder line.

Here's what it would look like without the inner part of the lights.

attachment.php


Very similar to the pre-reskinned 7.

attachment.php


This near side view shows better where the middle of the trunk bulges outward. The Volvo doesn't have this. At least, not to this extent.





As for everything else....

Okay, I'll finally play ball because the BMW love has become absurd. It was bad enough when you were the only one but now Duke's got one and it's become scary.

Oh noes! People like stuff you don't! How will you EVER cope?

And on the subject of Bangle's crappy designs, know which car decidedly does not have a Bangle Butt?

twin_turbo_17.jpg


That's right - no character line and no trunk isolation. <SNIP>

Wow. You really showed me there. And all this time I've been saying how every BMW has the same rear end styling.


In other words, even though according to you everyone and his sister are copying Bangle, <SNIP>

I said he started design trends, not "everyone and his sister are copying" him.

By-the-book strawman attack. Keep up the good work. The more you type, the sillier it all looks.


.....Bangle himself isn't even on board with the crap he produces. :rolleyes: And before you say that the new 3-series does have a slight Bangle Butt, you're wrong there too. EVERY SINGLE SEDAN MADE IN THE LAST DECADE runs a line from the window to the trunk, and most of them isolate the trunk from the taillights. Bangle just did it in a more pronounced manner, but you'll notice that while Bangle was getting criticized for his absurdly disgusting designs, Volvo was getting praised for their gorgeous ones. Bangle Butt? The credit goes to the Swedes.

Not that it matters much, because it's not as if I've been trying so hard to convince everyone that Bangle came up with all this stuff on his own AND that it's gorgeous.


///M-Spec
He didn't INVENT much of elements that goes into his style, but he certainly did combine them into something uniquely his own. The distinctive "Bangle butt" isn't even something he created, but yet the entire automotive press "credits" him with its ugliness.

///M-Spec
The thing about the Toyotas that make them nicer looking is instead of visually emphasizing the bulk of the trunk, the taillights mask it. When BMW left the tailights off the trunk on the 745, it simply made the trunk appear larger. The 6-Series also suffers from this styling element.

Real slam dunk you served up here.

Okay, tall tales are fun to tell and all, but it's time for a reality check:

1- At no time have I stated or implied every BMW sports a Bangle Butt, nor do I believe every BMW has one.

2- At no time have I stated or implied every car company is attempting to copy Bangle's work. Nor do I believe that. This includes The Butt.

3- The only reason I gave the Camry/LS470 example was because YOU ASKED for an example.

4- I made a statement that Bangle starts design trends. That is all.

5- I like some Bangle BMWs. I dislike some Bangle BMWs. I think the 7 is ugly. I think the rear of the 6 is ugly.

When you hit 'reply', try resisting the urge to pretend the contrary because it's easier to attack silly arguments I never made.



Oh that's brilliant. +rep there for sure! :lol:


EDIT:


BTW... Ermm.. So you wanna explain this to us?


and then...


Or do you just like to flip flop your opinions depending on who you're mad at from one day to the other?


M
 
Exactly, I agree with M5 power, people are just being silly about this whole copying crap.

The new C-class hasnt copied a lexus, it looks like a baby s-class.

The BMW 3 series doesnt look like its copied japanese either. Its just a bangliezed style revolution of the E46 coupe.

The A5 hasnt copied BMW, its just a evolution of the Audi Coupe, which was a evolution of the UrQuattro.

Think its time for people to stop over analysing.

I've put my reply to this in the new thread as I believe it is in the right vein.

Quite simply I just can't agree with Poverty on this, you seem to be implying that automotive design exists in its own little bubble. With each company and design team focusing only on what they do and no cross over or influence at work. I simply don't buy that at all, general trends and at times blatant lifting of designs has occurred and will continue to do so in the future.

To say that Audi have not looked at what BMW has done with the 3-series and have not taken it on board is, in my opinion naive. Of course they have, and you can bet that BMW have done exactly the same. For me true originality is far rarer than 'homage' in automotive design, and very few companies stick to true design evolution (Porsche being the best example).

Regards

Scaff
 
:rolleyes: Obviously I'm not going to take my time and go through every single word quoted in that post, which I think was the poster's intention. You've put waaaay too much time into this, as I knew you would, which is why I didn't want to get into this discussion in the first place. I will continue to believe I am right, and based on the agreement I received from many of the posters in the thread, I'm not alone.

When you hit 'reply', try resisting the urge to pretend the contrary because it's easier to attack silly arguments I never made.

I'm sorry I haven't got the time to craft the absurd posts which you do - I still think my post adequately proves my point, and anyone who looks at cars will come to the same conclusion I did, whether you like it or not.
 
Well I don't mean to start anything here but Lexus Acura and Infiniti all Used strong German (IE Mercedes and BMW) influences when starting out in the early 90s late 80s. I find it comforting that new companies can understandably start off using others ideas but still evolve with their own brand identity.
 
I don't think bangle desgined the new E92 as he has been the cheif of desginers for a while now (head desginers of BMW ,RR , mini)
 
No, he didn't design it directly (I believe it was Van Hooydonk), but regardless, all final designs do pass through Bangle, and he does have to sign them off. So if there's something he's not okay with, I don't think we'd be seeing it in production. I'd go so far as to say every BMW model on the road now is how it is because Bangle wants it that way. The new 3-coupe was designed to incorporate "flame surfacing" and more traditional coupe proportions and styling, so the Bangle Butt wasn't included... thank deity.

M5Power - Fair enough, but I still don't see the Volvo argument either, and a lot of people I know agree with it in person. I think it comes down to the fact the Volvo's is more of a "strong shoulder line" thing, and it all just blends together far better. Looking at the rear 3/4 view or a complete rear shot of a modern Volvo sedan and then at a 6 or 7, I think the important details will distance the two. It's a bit harder to put into words, though :-/
 
Source


Bangle is not shy about defending his designs. He has the backing of the BMW board of directors, who wanted to move BMW's image into the future. Bangle argues that it is necessary for product lines to follow a cycle of one revolutionary generation followed by an evolutionary generation followed by another revolutionary generation and so on. Indeed, he oversaw the last conservative wave of BMW designs with the redesign of the BMW 3-Series BMW E46 and the introduction of the BMW X5. For Bangle this marked the end of the evolution of a wave of BMW design and the 2002 7-series revolution was initiated with the 2002 introduction of the BMW E65. Bangle acknowledges that his designs do not look good in photographs, suggesting to critics that they should see the cars in real life before judging them on their looks.

So I'm guessing that we saw the last model of the revolution with the E92 , and we'll start seeing the evolution in the next 7 series maybe ? or the upcoming Z6/9?
 
Heh, I remember him stating that in an interview, and subsequently using it in an essay about the consumer designs (and the Z4 in particular).

The evolution has already began; witness the X5 :)
 
:rolleyes: Obviously I'm not going to take my time and go through every single word quoted in that post (continues on...)

If you aren't going to read through the post then why are you replying? Last I checked it was ok to have a long post that argued against points made in previous posts, in fact, you often make similarly well constructed, well researched posts. So, :rolleyes: Obviously... :sly:
 
If you aren't going to read through the post then why are you replying? Last I checked it was ok to have a long post that argued against points made in previous posts, in fact, you often make similarly well constructed, well researched posts. So, :rolleyes: Obviously... :sly:

But I'm not going to spend my time arguing with a fanboy whose opinion can't be changed - especially if common consensus is that I'm right. No point in that.
 
:rolleyes: Obviously I'm not going to take my time and go through every single word quoted in that post, which I think was the poster's intention. You've put waaaay too much time into this, as I knew you would, which is why I didn't want to get into this discussion in the first place.

Bull. What's this then?

*=emphasis mine

I thought you wanted to play ball? Now that you're getting beat, you wanna claim this was my idea all along?

BULL. I was ready to agree to disagree with this post.

///M-Spec
I guess I'll just have to manage to sleep at night if we don't find anything to agree on.

But then you wanted to play. So we played. What's the problem?

I will continue to believe I am right, and based on the agreement I received from many of the posters in the thread, I'm not alone.

I'm sorry I haven't got the time to craft the absurd posts which you do -I still think my post adequately proves my point, and anyone who looks at cars will come to the same conclusion I did, whether you like it or not.

Big whoop. My opinion is challenged, I defend it. You still disagree? Good for you. I explain myself and my opinion still stands. Still got a problem with that? You know what to do.

EDIT:

But I'm not going to spend my time arguing with a fanboy whose opinion can't be changed - especially if common consensus is that I'm right. No point in that.

Oh, and now comes the name calling... Boo-hoooo. :rolleyes:


M
 
arguing with a fanboy

MSPEC very well may be a BMW fanboy after all has owned several. However the main part of this argument doesn't seem to be very fanboyish at all. He pointed out that so called "Bangle Butt" (which he agrees is ugly as hell) has had influence over other car's styling. You pointed out that Volvo supposedly used the same style years before it became a Bangle trademark. I was almost ready to completely agree with you until M put the pics up showing the difference (Bangle butt, Volvo shoulders).

P.S. if you accuse me of mod brown nosing again I may jump through the screen and cause massive property damage, or maybe not :dopey:
 
In all fairness: I don't think you can call anyone who actually owns an M-Spec BMW a BMW fanboy anymore. Also, I have read ///M-Spec saying that BMW styling isn't for everyones taste per se. So YEAH, I'm sorry Doug. (Now go do my Guess That Car contest.)
 
They're all different enough and have a distinc style of thier own imo. The Cadillacs is the closest to the Audi's, the other two arn't that close at all, even if you turn the Evo's upside down. But even then, there's plenty to notice thats different in the Cadillac grille and the Audi grille, and not just the angles.
 
In all fairness: I don't think you can call anyone who actually owns an M-Spec BMW a BMW fanboy anymore.

It doesn't matter whether you own the product. When you stand up for them every single time they come up, even when you're wrong, that's fanboyism - Poverty is guilty of it, and a case is being built against M-Spec, too.
 
Plagerism

grills.jpg

Hardly. Audi got all stuffy when Rover released the V8 75, though:

v8r75fr.jpg


Frankly they didn't have to, considering Morgan sold more cars than 75 V8s.

Plagerism is Chery of china. They've done it quite a few times - the Tiggo is very similar to the Toyota Rav4, the Fulwin might aswell be a Seat Toledo, and the QQ is near identical to the Daewoo Matiz (so much so that GM went as far as saying that if you pulled a door off the QQ, you could stick it on the Matiz). I know GM have sued, but I'm not sure about the other two.

Infact, I did a writeup about it not long ago with quite a few examples.
 
It's spelled "Plagarism," by the way.

on Bangle's stuff...I really kind of like everything he's done 'cept the 7, and, when I look at the 7-series in shillouette, It is the least radical of Bangle's transformations. It still has a distinct front bumper, which you can't say about the 5-series and 3-series. the 7 has a foot in the old BMW style, and that may be why it doesn't work.

the Bangle butt isn't attractive from all angles, but it does have it's sexy views. I'm split on it.

I think the Evo X Grille more closely resembles the original GT-R Tokyo concept than anything else. that's not a bad benchmark, either
 
It doesn't matter whether you own the product. When you stand up for them every single time they come up, even when you're wrong, that's fanboyism - Poverty is guilty of it, and a case is being built against M-Spec, too.

Well, let's see how many times you can be dead wrong...

Here's a thread about the Z9 where someone calls it ugly. I'm not even there.. why would a fanboy miss a chance to defend BMWs?

Here's another thread about the same car. More people call it ugly. Hmmm. Where is BMW's #1 fanboy?

Here's a thread about the 1-series coupe. People call that car ugly too. Where am I? No where! Wouldn't a super fanboy like me be there defending that gorgeous car??


Oh look. There I finally am in another 1-series thread.
But I'm only there to give factual information and not my opinion. But look! Someone calls it ugly. But I didn't respond?!?! Why? Maybe that's his opinion and it's fine by me. Why would a true fanboy think that?!

Here's someone asking for a suggestion on a practical driver's car. I tell him I think the G35 is the best choice, even though several people suggest a 335i. There must be something wrong with me.

Here's the Chuck Norris Drives an E60 thread. Look, someone makes fun of BMWs there. OMG! I just laugh and say "funny". And then I get silly about it, make some jokes and just let it go!

Here's a thread where the Chinese steal the name "M3". Every fanboy should be righteously pissed off, right? But I don't even reply... why? I don't care.


Here another thread where someone wants an opinion about getting a car. He's even thinking about a BMW. But what's this? All I do is supply factual information and don't even attempt to persuade him to get the Bimmer!
Why would a fanboy pass up such an opportunity?!

Here's a thread about the new C-Class. But instead of bashing it like every good fanboy should, I don't even comment on it. I just supply factual information and keep my opinions to myself.

Here's a thread about the CTS-V. In it, I talk about how the CTS-V and M3 are both under-tired and how the Elise easily outhandles both cars! What kind of BMW uberfanboy would EVER admit another car outhandles the M3?! I even call it an UNDERSTEER QUEEN. O-Nooeess!!!111!!!one1

That's 10 times.

Oh wait.. here's 11.

Here's a thread where the M5 LOST a comparo test to the S6 and E63. So what does a rabid BMW fanboy have to say about it? I AGREE!?!?! I said the M5 deserved lose?! What is the matter with me?????

..and 12. Just for fun.

Here's the Top Cars of 2006 thread. The 335i is nominated. Did I vote for it? No. Go look, it's a public poll.


Truly, you've out done yourself with this one. Thank you.

No really; thank YOU for a good laugh to round out my Friday afternoon.


M
 
Wow, major proving wrong there! :lol:
Just because he has something related to BMW in is username doesn't make hima fanboy. I don't think Minicoopers are the best cars in the world, nor can I really say they're that good at all actually. I just think they look cool. :D

BTW, can someone agree or disagree with me on the whole accord/Mercedes thing? I'm curious to know how GTP feels about that...
 
BTW, can someone agree or disagree with me on the whole accord/Mercedes thing? I'm curious to know how GTP feels about that...

You mean in regard to this post?

Just to add a lighter note to this thread:
Does anyone else think the back of this Honda Accord looks very similar to many Mercedes models? If someone could give me a possible explanation, I'd be greatful.

http://www.we-todd-did-racing.com/wetoddimage.wtdr/wMTI0NTU5MDZzNDEzZGZkMzF5NTQx.jpg

Edit: That's big, let me link to it...

If I find a better pic I'll post it, but that's a pretty good representation.


I would agree that the rear light cluster in profile is similar to the CLS light cluster...

2006_MercedesBenz_CLS55_AMG_exdrvrsd.jpg


Regards

Scaff
 
Well, let's see how many times you can be dead wrong...

Exactly my point... I know as well as you do that there are thousands of times you've defended the brand, I just haven't got the time to go around finding posts as you have. :rolleyes:
 
It's spelled "Plagarism," by the way.

Whoops, my bad.

on Bangle's stuff...I really kind of like everything he's done 'cept the 7, and, when I look at the 7-series in shillouette, It is the least radical of Bangle's transformations. It still has a distinct front bumper, which you can't say about the 5-series and 3-series. the 7 has a foot in the old BMW style, and that may be why it doesn't work.

the Bangle butt isn't attractive from all angles, but it does have it's sexy views. I'm split on it.

I think the Evo X Grille more closely resembles the original GT-R Tokyo concept than anything else. that's not a bad benchmark, either

I hated the bangle stuff at first, but now I've got used to it it's not so bad. They're not the most beatiful cars, but they don't make me vomit any more. I still think the X5 is arguably the most attractive car in their line up because it looks the least bangled, but I'm quite partial to the new 3 series too (mainly because they dummed it down a shade).
 
I hated the bangle stuff at first, but now I've got used to it it's not so bad. They're not the most beatiful cars, but they don't make me vomit any more.

I think that's because the designs aren't as absurd as they were. I agree with your comments on the X5 - it's gorgeous.
 
I'm gonna have to agree with Poverty on the whole Audi grill thing in one particular area. Before Audi started throwing that ugly grill across their whole range, it wasn't so common to put as much emphasis on it as before. I think the Evo is quite a stretch of the imagination, and I just can't see past the ugly to determine any of the Malibu's features, but the Cadillac went from this:
cadillaccts2003800x600wpm5.jpg

to this:
cadillaccts2008800x600wzi5.jpg

and I have a hard time believing that they did it in coincidence. Especially considering how obviously slapped on the grill looks in relation to the rest of the front end.
 
I'm sorry I haven't got the time to craft the absurd posts which you do - I still think my post adequately proves my point, and anyone who looks at cars will come to the same conclusion I did, whether you like it or not.
I look at cars and I can very easily see what M-Spec is describing. On Bangle cars the taillights are used to accentuate the gap of "Bangle Butt" by having the whole thing mounted above the taillights. The trunk line for opening is in the gap for the "Butt," and above the taillights. The Volvo possesses neither, as the taillights bridge the gap between the flat surface to the left of the trunk lid and the actual top of the lid itself. As such, there is no gap. In addition, the trunk line is vertical coming directly from the top, whereas Bangle cars and their copies open along the gap between the "Butt" and the rest of the back of the car.
There is also a very major difference between the BMW 7 series and the S60 that I don't believe M-Sped detailed too much. The BMW's gap that forms the plunges down the side and wraps around the rear of the trunklid following the trunkline. It does the same thing on the new Camry. On the S60, the gap just stops, abruptly ending at the end of the car. I can provide pics of it if necessary.
So, to wrap up, I look at cars, I've been weaned on professional critique of car design for over a decade and I know what he's looking at. I also don't particularly care for BMW's, nor do I really aspire to own one. So what's your excuse? Perhaps its because
M5Power
I, um, hate BMW. And I love Audi. So, rationalize that.
Talk about bias.
 
I look at cars and I can very easily see what M-Spec is describing. On Bangle cars the taillights are used to accentuate the gap of "Bangle Butt" by having the whole thing mounted above the taillights.


AND NO OTHER CARS HAVE THIS

That's my point - people are copying the GOOD parts of Bangle's design - i.e., the Volvo bits - and NOT the bad parts - the separation of the taillights and the stupid trunk. Do you understand now?!
 
Back