- 1,545
- California
- Push-The-DZ
@Jose Torres,zer05ive: yesterday i got an invite to join the S.N.A.I.L SPEC RACING LEAGUE by the user "snailspecracing" via psn. i got offered to join and i accepted, the user told me to post a request to join here, and to watch for a reply with the time trial instructions... i got told to do post before saturday night otherwise i would have to wait until next sunday. my PSN is JT84_456.
this is my request to join the S.N.A.I.L racing league.
regards-Jose Torres
JT84_456(PSN)
That's too bad. I won't be able to race next week, but feel free to race without me.And I am going to bed. See you next friday if I can stay up.
Will do! Room number coming up!Save a spot for me zero
Sorry, only H-pattern and clutch is allowed.Hey @zer05ive I'm interested in racing in the mystic racing tonight and I'm wondering if it's just clutch and H-pattern gearing aloud?
Do you have a birthday coming up@zer05ive damn :/
I've got a practice room up if anyone cares to join.
Room# 1472-6118-3615-5264-8116
PSN: TEXAS_DES1GNER
The Mystic Car for the evening is:
1 - Alfa Romeo MiTo 1.4 T Sport '09
We're be lapping for a bit so feel free to join in before qualifying starts. 👍
Call it a noob mistake......I checked all three tracks before posting and did not see any snail events except for an enduro practice. Glad I found yall, it was good practice for me. Lots of really fast guys in there. Nice meeting all of you. Pretty cool @gt_adam_us stopped by too, too bad he didn't get a chance to race. Good luck Sunday.You should of join the room that was already open... still slots available.
I like it, but I think it's pretty similar to what @Handlebar suggested back in January with this post. Let me know if there's a difference that I'm overlooking though. Either way, I liked the idea both then and now and would be willling to try it out if that's what the general consensus was. It just seemed to fizzle out last time and didn't go anywhere. However, it did get a lot closer to implementation than @varga's suggestion!I had an idea for prize C last night. 💡 What if we gave prize C a "freeze play" by which I mean they can choose a part(track or car) to stay, or freeze, for combo B. This would actually be a prize instead of just the tie breaking vote, which rarely happens.
So if you win prize C you can have a say in what part of combo B stays, the track or the car.
What do you guys think about the prize C freeze play?
I'm betting most don't know this, but we actually let the prize winners pick which prize they wanted. Back then, we only had one or two divisions so the prize winners were always 1st, 2nd, and 3rd place of the top division. So for example, 1st place in D1 could choose Prize A, Prize B, or Prize C. Then 2nd place could choose one of the two prizes remaning, while 3rd place would just get whichever prize was left. In fact, after our very first race (when we only had one division), the 2nd place finisher opted to choose Prize C (a free car) even though Prize B was still available for him to choose.I heard you suggest this last night, but I don't have a mic, so I couldn't respond. The part about this I don't like about is that from my perspective, prize C seems to have more "power" than prize B would. Being able to tell the prize B winner what they need to replace. It is a good idea though and I agree we should find a better reward for prize C winners.
I think the "freeze" power is less desirable of a prize or at lest less "fun", but the ability to "freez" is perhaps more strategic. Either way, it would be easier to decide one way or another and lock in Prize B and Prize C so that there isn't any confusion as to who gets to "freeze" and who gets to pick.I didn't want this to get lost amidst the iracing talk. coach, I see it as not taking away from prize B, because they can only change 1 part anyway, but making the selection easier. Prize B still has the "power" to choose anything with in reason, where as prize C can only freeze the car or track. I don't see that as C being more powerful.
So are you saying that you think Prize B should be able to "freeze" and Prize C should be able to replace the "unfrozen" car/track?I disagree with you here Goat. Having the capability to limit choices will always trump making a choice.
For instance.
You can chose anything from category A or B. No wait, now, you can only choose from category B.
Either way you look at it, the Prize C reward, without being able to share cars, paints and other game items, needs a bit of a boost to be worth the trouble.
I didn't realize handle had made that suggestion, go prize C freeze!I like it, but I think it's pretty similar to what @Handlebar suggested back in January with this post. Let me know if there's a difference that I'm overlooking though. Either way, I liked the idea both then and now and would be willling to try it out if that's what the general consensus was. It just seemed to fizzle out last time and didn't go anywhere. However, it did get a lot closer to implementation than @varga's suggestion!
I'm betting most don't know this, but we actually let the prize winners pick which prize they wanted. Back then, we only had one or two divisions so the prize winners were always 1st, 2nd, and 3rd place of the top division. So for example, 1st place in D1 could choose Prize A, Prize B, or Prize C. Then 2nd place could choose one of the two prizes left, while 3rd place would just get whichever prize was left. In fact, after our very first race (when we only had one division), the 2nd place finisher opted to choose Prize C (a free car) even though Prize B was still available for him to choose.
I guess what I'm getting at is that we could theoretically let the Prize B winner choose whether he wanted to "freeze" a car or track or whether he wanted to select a new car or track. In other words, he could choose whether or not he wanted Prize B or the newly proposed Prize C. That being said, the reason we started assigning the prizes was because 9 times out or 10, the prizes were picked in the order of Prize A, Prize B, and then Prize C. So just assigning them allowed us to speed up the whole process but not making everyone wait for the prize winners to select which prize they wanted.
I think the "freeze" power is less desirable of a prize or at lest less "fun", but the ability to "freez" is perhaps more strategic. Either way, it would be easier to decide one way or another and lock in Prize B and Prize C so that there isn't any confusion as to who gets to "freeze" and who gets to pick.
So are you saying that you think Prize B should be able to "freeze" and Prize C should be able to replace the "unfrozen" car/track?
But yeah, I admit that Prize C is a bit lame when it rarely means anything at all. If we did in fact adopt this newly proposed Prize C, I would suggest removing the tie-breaking vote from it altogether. Instead, I would suggest that a tie be broken by allowing all three prize winners votes to count. Since three is an odd number, the tie would still be guaranteed to be broken. 👍
Word! I actually like this idea Goat, and with zer0s added twist I think it should at least be agreeable to the only 2 naysayers.I didn't realize handle had made that suggestion, go prize C freeze!
I didn't realize handle had made that suggestion, go prize C freeze!
Yes and no. No matter which way you order it, the one will be waiting on the other.So are you saying that you think Prize B should be able to "freeze" and Prize C should be able to replace the "unfrozen" car/track?
But yeah, I admit that Prize C is a bit lame when it rarely means anything at all. If we did in fact adopt this newly proposed Prize C, I would suggest removing the tie-breaking vote from it altogether. Instead, I would suggest that a tie be broken by allowing all three prize winners votes to count. Since three is an odd number, the tie would still be guaranteed to be broken. 👍
Word! I actually like this idea Goat, and with zer0s added twist I think it should at least be agreeable to the only 2 naysayers.
Interested in anything that will let us focus on cars/tracks/racing instead of hoping we don't get disconnected AGAIN
Owens - any problems with iRacing that you've seen so far?
With the changes in divisional promotion and relagation, D7 is in need of a few positions; back up host/director and scorekeeper with @goofytyler moving to D6. I would like to do the scorekeeping and if @tevesh2 doesn't mind, I'd like to be the data specialist as well. I feel I had a pretty good system while I did it in D8 that was quick and efficient. I can also be the backup replay uploader as well. In summary;
D7 backup host/director - Needed (@wvhellbilly?)
D7 scorekeeper - @KTR5
D7 data specialist - @tevesh2 (and @KTR5 as primary or backup, depending if @tevesh2 wants to let me do it)
D7 backup replay uploader - @KTR5
D7 photographer - @KTR5 to add some photos along with @BayouSimDrifter who is the primary
I'm really excited to have been moved up, so thanks to @JLBowler for believing I can do it. And to be moved up with my closest rivals from D8 @speer9892003 @wvhellbilly and @Sharkb8ii makes it even better.
I'm already director but you can take over photographer. Fyi I'm out of town this weekend so someone will need to host for this week.
Ahh crap, I totally forgot about the 140 character limit! (which is embarrassing considering how often I have to edit tweets so that they will fit under the 140 character limit ).. Since Twitter won't be able to fit the message I would want to send unless multiple tweets were sent (far from ideal), does anyone else have an idea on how we could send messages to Kaz would know for sure that he saw them? I already checked facebook, but from what I can tell, he doesn't have an account there (at least not publicly).If you're just wanting to send short messages via twitter, wouldn't google translate function?
Right, I said we needed a back up host / director. @wvhellbilly was ours in D8, but I'm pretty sure he won't be available this weekend either.
As for taking over photography duties, I like your pics as well. I don't think it would be too much if we both did some. Maybe I won't post 15-20 pics now, rather in the 5-10 range. We'll see how it goes.
I see that... and how's that going? Do we even have a host for tomorrow?I am back home. I can be the backup host for D7. I'm going to try to get some practice in today and tomorrow. I haven't even bought the cars for this week yet. Really need some racing!
Looking forward to racing in D7!
D8 needs pretty much every position filled.