I'll ignore the insult and get to the point of your post, which is that you still don't get it. Here's an analogy to help explain what I'm trying to say. Let's say a super fast D1 driver sets a TT lap time of 1:29:8
13. Because of the randomness of the last two digits of his lap time, I've represented it below as a roll of the dice:
Now let's say said super fast D1 driver goes wants to see who would win the ButtKicker if his lap time was the fastest. All he has to do is check the finalists' number picks. For this example, let's use
the picks from the last challenge we had. Once he pulls up that list, he sees that
@Dragonwhisky would be the winner. However, he thinks to himself, "The stewards gave me a penalty last week and it was total BS!! And Dragonwhisky is the Chief Steward so it's his at least partially his fault! I wouldn't want to help
him with the ButtKicker!". So with that, he decides to take another lap so that his lap time doesn't end on any of Dragonwhisky's numbers.
Yes, the rationale above is unlikely and hopefully nobody would ever stoop to that. But the suggestion that it's not possible and that we should allow a prize selection process in which someone can simply roll another dice (i.e. set another time) to impact the outcome is..
unwise.. to say the least. I was going to call it "laughable", but you already used that one..