- 9,554
- Vermont
- catamount39
Yes.Kyle Petty is still a 🤬 bag.
Yes.Kyle Petty is still a 🤬 bag.
I do.
2001: Gordon championship, farewell Earnhardt, hello Harvick. Hello also to Kansas and Chicagoland.
2002: Smoke finally prevails. Marlin not only gives away 500, he also pretty much has his career ended following wreck at Kansas. McMurray wins in 2nd race. Ryan Newman and Johnson had great rookie fight.
2003: Kenseth wins championship with 1 win, first driver to win with 2 or less since Labonte in 1996. Winston leaves NASCAR.
To some extent.OK, Who actually remembers the entire 2001-2003 Cup Seasons?
I do.
2001: Gordon championship, farewell Earnhardt, hello Harvick. Hello also to Kansas and Chicagoland.
2002: Smoke finally prevails. Marlin not only gives away 500, he also pretty much has his career ended following wreck at Kansas. McMurray wins in 2nd race. Ryan Newman and Johnson had great rookie fight.
2003: Kenseth wins championship with 1 win, first driver to win with 2 or less since Labonte in 1996. Winston leaves NASCAR.
Agreed. And to expand on that, Harvick also won the Busch championship in 2001, the same year Jimmie Johnson and Ryan Newman picked up their first career Busch series wins.
2002: Greg Biffle won the championship before the season finale, Scott Wimmer won the final two races of the year, and Hank Parker Jr. captured his final career victory.
2003: Brian Vickers holds off five other drivers to capture the Busch Series championship, and Kasey Kahne, who struggled during his first year with Akins Motorsports, wins the season finale at Homestead. Best year of the Busch Series, IMO.
OK, Not trying to start a war, but I want to know. See, I didn't follow the sport like I do now, and I had no exposure to outside opinions for a few years later. What did people say about the points racing back then, or did they? All we do is 🤬 about it now, but I don't know if fans did so when Gordon was unreachable and Kenseth made it look easy.To some extent.
2001 started off terribly for reasons all of us know. Gordon had his last dominant year. Rudd and Jarrett might've had something if their engines would've held together. Dodge's first year with Marlin getting them the win at Michigan. Junior winning the Daytona night race. Robby Gordon somehow winning New Hampshire. Craven getting that first win at Martinsville. New tracks on the schedule which were awful.
2002 had that wacky ending to the 500. Bill Elliott winning Indy. Marlin had the points lead but took a big hit at Richmond and an even worse one at Kansas that I think ruined his career. McMurray's shocking win. Mark Martin had a shot at winning a championship but Stewart ended up taking it. Johnny Benson holding off Martin to win Rockingham.
2003 had Craven/Busch finish at Darlington. Ricky Rudd's "yap-yap mouth" comment pointed at Harvick at Richmond. Winston's last year of sponsorship. Most importantly, Kenseth winning just one race early but held the points lead for just about the entire season. NASCAR decides this was unacceptable and they created the "wonderful" Chase system that we have today.
2003 had Craven/Busch finish at Darlington. Ricky Rudd's "yap-yap mouth" comment pointed at Harvick at Richmond. Winston's last year of sponsorship. Most importantly, Kenseth winning just one race early but held the points lead for just about the entire season. NASCAR decides this was unacceptable and they created the "wonderful" Chase system that we have today.
It's either complain about someone possibly running away with a championship under a traditional system or a system when an entire year's of work is thrown out the window because of one race.OK, Not trying to start a war, but I want to know. See, I didn't follow the sport like I do now, and I had no exposure to outside opinions for a few years later. What did people say about the points racing back then, or did they? All we do is 🤬 about it now, but I don't know if fans did so when Gordon was unreachable and Kenseth made it look easy.
It's either complain about someone possibly running away with a championship under a traditional system or a system when an entire year's of work is thrown out the window because of one race.
My biggest beef with the Chase system is that one of the few things that hasn't changed much is the tracks that they run. What's the point of being any good at any of the non-Chase tracks, especially with the current setup? Heck, if you're not great at Homestead, then you'll never win a championship.
Hes a bit of an ass, and speaks as if he was actually successful, but I respect him.I don't understand why people hate Kyle Petty. Can someone elaborate on this?
Yeah I can see that lolHes a bit of an ass, and speaks as if he was actually successful, but I respect him.
Fixed. Oh and on that bombshell, sayonara 2016 thread!Toyota wins the Manufacturer's Championship. Cue the angry old rednecks on fb with Confederate Flag profile pictures.
Well there's a reason he's in the both now soooooooo......Steve Letarte is getting salty with everyone on Twitter that miss the old pre-chase format lmao
The race was run just a few hours after NASCAR chairman and CEO Brian France addressed the media, saying the sport was healthy despite continued declines in TV ratings and attendance. "... We are still very pleased with our position in sports. The audience isn't going away at all. It's sliding to different places, consuming in different ways."
The amount of class from Edwards... In 2011, and tonight. While I will never like him more than Tony, I know who im rooting for next year.
Bunch of boneheads. Almost dumber than F1's current higher ups...and that's saying something.TV ratings for NASCAR finale show huge decline
The message continues not to register with the upper management.
With the current design, NASCAR made the first 26 races all but irrelevant. One win and even Buescher can make the Chase. Barring injury, you know drivers like Jimmie, Harvick and the Gibbs stable will be in the 2017 Chase. The races that are relevant has to compete directly against the NFL and the MLB playoffs and I know I watched the races far less come September.- The Chase was designed because the causal fans lost interest by years end. Not the diehards who eat, sleep, and live racing.
Anything but this **** system.With the current design, NASCAR made the first 26 races all but irrelevant. One win and even Buescher can make the Chase. Barring injury, you know drivers like Jimmie, Harvick and the Gibbs stable will be in the 2017 Chase. The races that are relevant has to compete directly against the NFL and the MLB playoffs and I know I watched the races far less come September.
If I had the power, I would go with a straightforward solution. Eliminate the Chase and simply state that the championship will be decided by a driver's top 26 races in the season. In other words, a driver can miss time due to injury or have bad luck and they can have those finishes dropped off with stronger finishes. Each race will matter. Teams can try winning through consistency or gamble for wins knowing that they have mulligans to fall back on.
If I heard correctly, WWE is having the same issue, and like the muscleheads in Connecticut they continue on the same path and refuse to face facts. People who enjoy sports still watch on TV. You can have any number of streaming options, but if it's on TV those people will watch it, even if it's Fox's IMSA "coverage". These people are delusional. They have no clue how it all works anymore. Bill Sr. had to build it, Bill Jr. built it into the juggernaut, Brian is trying to mimic the 🤬 Costa Concordia!TV ratings for NASCAR finale show huge decline
The message continues not to register with the upper management.