2018 Rolex Australian Grand PrixFormula 1 

  • Thread starter Jimlaad43
  • 369 comments
  • 21,892 views
Did you conclude this from looking at a few studio picture side by side comparisons? This just sounds like belittlement of a great achievement.
https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-m...ualifying-despite-replica-barbs-idUKKBN1H00JF
"Grosjean, who has long aspired to be a Ferrari driver, said disparaging comments about the Ferrari ties were unfair even if Haas used the same engine, gearbox and suspension as the Italians."

I've nothing against Haas but considering where their technology comes from their grid position shouldn't be any lower, at least in early races.
 
OK, I've had enough of this stupid Halo hate.

You want to know why I am happy to see the Halo on cars? In my time marshalling, I have been unfortunate enough to attend a fatal accident. It was a crash in a single seater where a driver was killed because his head was exposed. It was really not nice to be around and is not something I hope to see again. Why do I not dislike the halo? I know how horrible it is to go to a car and see terrible injuries. I wouldn't want to wish that experience on any other marshals. It really ruins your day/week/month to see somebody killed doing something they and you love. Do we really want another Justin Wilson type accident broadcast across the world and playing out in front of a packed grandstand filled with children? No. Do we want to open up GTPlanet and see a "RIP F1 driver" thread? No. The whole Jules Bianchi incident was a horrible moment for the sport.

The drivers asked for head protection, and the halo is the only viable solution at the moment. It will be improved to not only look better, but function even better than it does at the moment. How much do you really want to see one of the drivers killed? If the answer is anything other than "I don't", you really need to sort out your priorities and look at WHY the halo has been introduced, not just look at it and go...
sponge.jpg

iT loOkS DiSGusTIng, tAkE it AWay

I don't like the way it looks. I can see many issues with it, but BECAUSE I understand the reasons it's there, there is NO ARGUMENT AGAINST IT. Aesthetics the only argument against it, which is a pathetic argument. In modern F1, a driver is more at risk from being hit in the head by flying debris or other cars than they are to be trapped in a burning car. F1 takes place on a circuit with marshals everywhere. If a car is on fire, someone will at least attempt to stop the fire in enough time that a driver won't be trapped for any time longer than necessary.

The Indycar shield is not a solution yet. There are too many issues with its strength in car-to-environment crashes for it to appear on cars yet. But it will probably replace the halo in a few years.

Safety is not a joke. In some places it can be taken too far, but here, it is not being taken too far.


Now, let's ignore the halo for a while, because it has zero affect on anything meaningful, and focus on the racing. That's what we're all here to watch, and what we want to see. This season should be much closer than last season, and the racing should be awesome. So lets focus on what matters, and not something that has been fully researched, and is being introduced with full confidence. Any issues it may cause have been thought of, researched and explained.

tl;dr: Get over it.
Jules Bianchi incident was a big fault by the fia, and all the workers around thats crash site.. it must been red flag and not a green flag atleast for that sector, with a bulldozer on track. If that was not the case he would have survived.
 
Jules Bianchi incident was a big fault by the fia, and all the workers around thats crash site.. it must been red flag and not a green flag atleast for that sector, with a bulldozer on track. If that was not the case he would have survived.

It wasn't a green flag.
 
Jules Bianchi incident was a big fault by the fia, and all the workers around thats crash site.. it must been red flag and not a green flag atleast for that sector, with a bulldozer on track. If that was not the case he would have survived.

It was double waved yellows (slow down and be prepared to stop).

Emotions aside, Bianchi was driving faster than he should have been. He was not slowed down enough and prepared to stop.
 
Ten minutes of random camera footage with no commentary, and now it's showing an espn history program. Are they seriously this stupid? I have no words...
 
Is there supposed to be a pre race show? ESPN's schedule lists one but they've had a couple of live shots to the track and now they're showing some sports magazine show.
 
Fernando P10.

Alonso will win, comfortably.

But seriously, this one looks like it's going to be a drag race between Merc and Ferrari, now that it's dry.
 
And a Williams is out.

It's going to be a long year for Williams.

Knew they'd go poorly, but this is too much too soon.
 
I do kinda like the font, I guess.

Wow, thought Bottas would've moved up a position or two by now.

was thinking more of that Track stats rather than font.

The one with that black F1 car with stats like track downforce, Tire agression, ect.
 
Aaaand I already hate the ESPN coverage. How long until F1s streaming service starts?

Edit: And what's going on with Bottas? He's still way down in 14th. :odd:
 

Latest Posts

Back