McLaren
Premium
- 45,412
- Texas
@Stotty, any idea if the manual-equipped cars will create demand on the market, or if this will lower the 911R values now that a proper manual GT3 is available again?
The red trim on the seats is gash! Otherwise looks pretty much like the mk1.
The engine sounds like the big change... 4.0l with finger followers rather than hydraulic valve actuation... should make it a bit more reliable than the gen 1 unit... plus it makes a bit more power, has more torque over a wider rev range, and still revs to 9k.
Seems to be the case with most Porsche's. I'd take the red interior bits over the yellow.
That looks a lot better than the .1 version. I love that rear wing.
To be fair, there isn't a "lot" different between any 911 anyway (within the same generation, I mean). The changes are noticeable enough to distinguish it easily over the 991.1 and I have to agree with VXR that it looks a lot better because of the differences.A 'lot' better? I'm struggling to spot any major styling differences to the gen 1...
Now, hopefully this pulls the rug out from underneath 991.1 GT3 prices...
I'm interested to see how the manual option will effect PDK prices on the 991.1. Gotta wonder how many 991.1 owners will ditch for the gen 2 simply to have the transmission option they may have wanted from the start. I mean, there must have been a demand or else they wouldn't have brought the manual to the gen 2 at all.Really depends how many Porsche make... if it's similar to the gen 1's (ie; c.350 cars for the UK), I only see a slight softening in prices... they might slip back to around list (£115-120k from the current £130k), but don't think we'll see them go any lower (in the UK, at least).
I like the trim.The red trim on the seats is gash! Otherwise looks pretty much like the mk1.
The engine sounds like the big change... 4.0l with finger followers rather than hydraulic valve actuation... should make it a bit more reliable than the gen 1 unit... plus it makes a bit more power, has more torque over a wider rev range, and still revs to 9k.
For me the biggest improvement is abandoning the awful LED whiskers of the 991.1 and incorporating the more subtle and attractive LEDs of the 991.2 generation. That one change improves the fascia tremendously.It looks pretty much identical to me, and I'm about as anorak as you can get with GT Porsche's
I'm interested to see how the manual option will effect PDK prices on the 991.1. Gotta wonder how many 991.1 owners will ditch for the gen 2 simply to have the transmission option they may have wanted from the start. I mean, there must have been a demand or else they wouldn't have brought the manual to the gen 2 at all.
I understand the need for the quickest shift times on a car meant primarily for track use (although I think it's silly to think people care about lap times that much), but I will always disagree with Porsche forcing the cars to have only PDK rather than offering a manual option on a car meant for both road and track use.I think AP has already said RS will be PDK only.
I understand the need for the quickest shift times on a car meant primarily for track use (although I think it's silly to think people care about lap times that much), but I will always disagree with Porsche forcing the cars to have only PDK rather than offering a manual option on a car meant for both road and track use.
But of course I am not a Porsche GT3 consumer (too poor) and my demand for a manual option means nothing. Also, I've never experienced PDK personally, so my question would be, is PDK still fun for both normal driving and track use? For those who don't care about lap times but just want a thrilling driving/ track experience, does it even matter if it's PDK only?
http://www.autocar.co.uk/car-news/m...t-mid-engined-version-and-major-design-changePorsche Motorsport’s manager of high-performance cars, Andreas Preuninger, told Autocar: "There is nothing coming soon, but in the mid-term don’t rule it [a mid-engined 911] out." He added: "I think that adding some excitement to the car in this way wouldn’t be bad."
Preuninger’s boss, Frank Walliser, confirmed there was significant customer interest in such a car. Porsche Motorsport has a proud tradition of listening closely to its customers, one reason why a manual gearbox is now once more available on the latest 911 GT3.
The mid-engined 911 will be comparatively easy for Porsche to produce, not least because the car already exists in racing RSR form and proved its potential by coming second in the Daytona 24 Hours on its first outing. There is no issue with rear seats because GT 911s have always been homologated as two-seaters. And now that Porsche has just one Motorsport engine that's used in everything from the standard road GT3 to the ultimate mid-engined racing RSR, engineering the car should be relatively simple.
Moreover, despite the fact that the normally aspirated 4.0-litre engine already produces 493bhp and revs to 9000rpm, it has considerable additional development potential. Walliser says the most they’ve seen so far is 608bhp with the engine "screaming on the bench".
Quite what the mid-engined 911 will be called is unclear. It could have an all-new name, adopt the same RSR acronym of its racing counterpart or use one of the existing road car names.
What is certain is that Porsche doesn't think the car is in any way heretical to the 911 brand. When asked if Porsche could really call such a car a 911, Walliser replied simply: "We already do."
Of course, it's your call.@McLaren - I hope you don't mind inheriting a new thread, but the leak seemed like as good of a place as any to draw a line in the sand. With the automotive news on the front page, this makes it much easier for readers than being sent to the beginning of a thread started in 2011.
this will lower the 911R values now that a proper manual GT3 is available again?
Edit* Doh. I thought you meant for the mid-engine speculation. Didn't know it was a new thread altogether for the new GT3; figured that was still 991 news.