I knew you were going to post that.
and then I'll be crying in my corner when the Camaro out does the Mustang on the track again.The actual performance reviews will prove how much work they really did with the new chassis because if the new SS is as fast as or quicker than the current 1LE, the Mustang is again toast on-track.
....it looks bulkier than before. It's fat is covering up it's own lines!I like it. It looks better than the last gen. Its becoming more of a modern sports car than a retro, bulky muscle car.
I recently drove the V8 and EcoBoost Mustangs that Europe will be getting back to back over two days.Based on the typical relationship between what Ford says Ecoboost engines can do over comparable engines and what Ecoboost engines are actually capable of, I don't think it's too much of a stretch to say that Ford has been getting it wrong consistently ever since they started throwing "Ecoboost" around as a buzzword. You need no further proof of people buying into the hype than to type in "turbo" in the search bar for the Mustang thread and go back to the last pages of the search. That the public seems to happily pay price premiums for Ecoboost engines that produce less power than the base motors (like in the Taurus, Edge and Explorer) for negligible theoretical fuel economy bonuses doesn't preclude GM from taking potshots at Ford over the issue when specifically asked.
The exterior is inoffensive, though it's far too big and the beltline is too high. But that interior is utterly revolting. Even in the press shots it looks cheap. The design is ridiculous; they added a touchscreen only to realise that they had no room for the vents, so now they're basically useless. Those seats may as well be bench seats, they've got basically no upper bolstering. And the less said about that hideous steering wheel the better.
I think all the old Camaro owners they listened to are a bunch of middle aged guys too fat to drive a Vette.