Yup, and it does limit your strategy a little, if you can indeed run longer than your stint limits.There is no reason at all that there should be a stint limit in LMP1. It's absolutely stupid. Why in the hell would you have a series with Endurance in the name and then punish teams for actually trying to attain endurance?
Peugeot had their new hybrid cars ready in 2012, they were already at Sebring ready for the season to start when management pulled the plug, it's 6 years old now though so wouldn't even be as quick as the current LMP2 cars.
Yup, even with all their dominance. As everyone is saying, roll on the hypercar era...
I think it's part of the EOT, Toyota have agreed to cuts in performance but wanted to still have the efficiency advantage.There is no reason at all that there should be a stint limit in LMP1. It's absolutely stupid. Why in the hell would you have a series with Endurance in the name and then punish teams for actually trying to attain endurance?
So as far as I can tell, it's not just the on-track competition lacking...all these regs have seen even Le Mans/the WEC get too gimmicky for its own good. Where did it all go wrong?
Well yes, that much is true. But they could at least have kept the rules themselves more authentic... Do they have to force everything, even in this dark age?I'd like to think hybrids and infinite costs.
There is no logic for it. Only thing I can think of is for the goal of having everyone together at the end, but an endurace series should reward teams for being efficient and going farther on a tank of fuel than other teams.Why is there a maximum stint length in LMP1 and GTE pro?? What’s the logic behind it??
One would have figured they would already have the efficiency advantage with the hybrid system without needing a stint limit from EoT.I think it's part of the EOT, Toyota have agreed to cuts in performance but wanted to still have the efficiency advantage.
Did I just here one of the Eurosport guys call #92... Peppa Porsche?
That's all I can think of right now.When you see the faces in the Toyota box and 2016 comes to your mind.
So technical question... If the lead Toyota loses it on track/damages the car to the point where it can't get back to the pit lane, would it still only finish 2nd since the 3rd place car can't complete more laps than it already has? Or is it considered a DNF because it didn't technically finish?
Did I just here one of the Eurosport guys call #92... Peppa Porsche?