Good man, still racing approaching 66, I'm impressed, Sir. You have a couple of decades on me, so I'm not going to be able to use the 'Old Man' card as an excuse for my driving
I was more meaning that if you shift manually, you can actually use a downshift rather than brake into a corner. Obviously driving auto, you don't have that option. I appreciate that it may only be a few corners a lap where you can use a downshift instead of the brakes, but over the life of a race, that could amount to several seconds.
There's every chance that running auto in these F1 cars smooths the transition between gears, I'm going to have to bow to your experience, I can't drive these cars, in fact 550PP is about my limit. Anything above that and I tend to find I get far too intimate with the track surroundings
In my experience, in real life, if you take two practically identical cars, with the exception of the gearbox, the manual will be faster. Now, it's been a long time since I drove an automatic, they're not so popular in Europe, and I appreciate that modern gearboxes are much more adept than they were even a decade ago.
I also have very limited real world experience of driving high-end cars, my driving history is entirely populated with underpowered, FWD cars, that's just how it is over here. I suspect that if you were to take a high-end Beemer or Merc, with a trick auto box, it will probably be able to change cogs a lot faster than you can manually. However, 0-60 time doesn't count for much, if the trick auto box isn't particularly good at anticipating what you're going to do next. I've read and seen enough to suggest that when you're on the track, it's better to be fully in charge of your gears, whilst day-to-day driving, an auto can be preferable.
The only auto I've driven for any length of time, was a 10 day jaunt around New England. Driving an auto saved my arse, I'm not sure I could have coped with negotiating my way out of Logan airport, if I'd had to change gears using my right hand
{Cy}