- 1,397
i thought i'd post this. tells a different story, one that is saddening, frightening, outrageous, yet true. just goes to show there is always more to the eye
story here
story here
This paragraph bothers me. Earlier the author stated that they were foreign tourists, conference attendees, and locals who checked into the hotel for shelter. Somehow by this point they were all poor and black. Just by stating as fact that these were code words for if you are poor and black you are not getting out of New Orleans shows that he is inserting his opinions into this story.Zardoz"We questioned why we couldn't cross the bridge anyway, especially as there was little traffic on the 6-lane highway. They responded that the West Bank was not going to become New Orleans and there would be no Superdomes in their City. These were code words for if you are poor and black, you are not crossing the Mississippi River and you were not getting out of New Orleans."
They were, but they weren't properly implemented nor was evacuation ordered in time.But keep in mind there were many people who refused to abandon their homes, and to the best of my knowledge, the resources to carry out a mass evacuation of the entire city were not in place.
They weren't.ledhedwhat the f%$#k were they thinking ?
neanderthali thought i'd post this. tells a different story, one that is saddening, frightening, outrageous, yet true. just goes to show there is always more to the eye
story here
danoffrefugees.
Viper ZeroRefugee can also mean someone who is displaced.
The Media loves playing these name games. Why not call them citizens? The Media wants to create a mindset to it's viewers. Saying Refugee sounds a lot worse than Evacuee or Citizen. The Media does it all the time. Bomber < Terrorist, Political Leader < Dictator, Military Combatant < Insurgent
danoffThe story is full of increadibly biased and fairly insane opinions, but some of what happened to them was very wrong.
Because after the National Guard and Coast Guard began their rescue operations 5,000 police officers were ordered to stop and prevent looting. The rescues didn't stop, but it also became apparent that the looting and violent crimes had become a situation that had to be dealt with.JacktheHatOver here in the UK, ITN ran a report where the journalist spoke of how armed police were patrolling homes owned by what were described as 'well-off whites' whilst people where still waiting, with dead bodies floating past, to be evacuated in the 'poor black' areas.
He was infuriated by the situation.
FoolKillerBecause after the National Guard and Coast Guard began their rescue operations 5,000 police officers were ordered to stop and prevent looting. The rescues didn't stop, but it also became apparent that the looting and violent crimes had become a situation that had to be dealt with.
I agree, but rescuers were being shot at and people were still being rescued by National Guard and Coast Guard. It was not as if rescue attempts were stopped.JacktheHatI'm sorry, in no way do I condone looting (unless for survival e.g. food and water) or violent crime but, the protection of peoples property is nowhere near as important as saving lives.
FoolKillerI agree, but rescuers were being shot at and people were still being rescued by National Guard and Coast Guard. It was not as if rescue attempts were stopped.
New Orleans local police only, approximately 5,000 of them, were ordered to prevent looting and violence. Yes, some of them decided sitting in the comfortable home of the affluent was the "best way" to do this and were wrong.JacktheHatBut they were reduced and resources diluted.
There were still thousands of people waiting to be rescued.
I understand that the rescuers needed protection, but did peoples property? I don't know where they (the officers) were from (police, national guard etc.) but they were guarding houses - not protecting rescuers.
FoolKillerNew Orleans local police only, approximately 5,000 of them, were ordered to prevent looting and violence. Yes, some of them decided sitting in the comfortable home of the affluent was the "best way" to do this and were wrong.
The situation was bad and when gangs were roaming the streets with guns it became a desperate situation. Once federal rescue attempts were in full swing local authorities felt that the local police would be more useful preventing the violence and looting. Whether they were wrong or right I don't know, but when some National Guard troops who had been in Iraq were saying that New Orleans was worse it makes you wonder, because a dead rescuer can rescue no one.
JacktheHatThat's 5000 people who could have been out saving lives.
Perhaps if enough resources had been utilised in the first place the rescuers could have done their job before the looters arrived...
SwiftOr perhaps if 1) The people would've gotten out when told to and 2) The Mayor and Govenor would've enacted somekind of evacuation plan for those without the means to quickly leave. The looting never would have happened? What a concept.
You do realize that the looters were citizens of New Orleans and did not "arrive" from anywhere, don't you? These were people who were already there and started looting.JacktheHat...before the looters arrived...
It was not a budget issue, it was a power issue. Federal troops cannot march on US soil without the request of local authorities. It prevents a dictatorial takeover. National Gurad are under the command of their local governors and only go to another state when requested by that state's governor and then ordered by their local governor to go or follow the orders of the president.Or if America, as a whole, had got it's act together instead of worrying whose budget it would come out of?
JacktheHatOr if America, as a whole, had got it's act together instead of worrying whose budget it would come out of?