This probably isn’t the best place to post it, but it is the thread that is most frequented on the Photography section, and a quick reply is needed, so I hope posting it here doesn’t violate any rules...
I’m on a vacation in Japan now, and I would like to buy a new camera (or at least a new lens) after seeing how much cheaper cameras are in Japan than in HK (the price for the same camera can be cheaper by ~125 USD if you buy one made by a local brand in Japan compared to buying in HK!). The problem is, while I have a brand in mind (Nikon), I’m having difficulty narrowing down which of their cameras I want. As of now I can think of the following requirements, after some experience with my father’s Olympus OM-D E-M5:
- the camera must have an actual lock for attaching it to a tripod, instead of just a simple screw-and-hole (like on the E-M5, because the screw gets loose quickly after frequent usage)
- the colours on the photos produced must be as accurate as possible, even better if identical to reality. So the wider range of colours detected and represented, the better
- the photo resolution must be no lower than 5000 x 3700 pixels (the current E-M5 has a resolution of around 4600 x 3500 pixels)
- the anti-shake function (or image stabilisation, I don’t really know what the difference is between them
) must be at least on par with the E-M5
- the camera controls and user interface must be intuitive, and the user should be able to place the focus anywhere on the screen (a grid where users can place the focus on any of the composing squares, just like the one on my E-M5 is good enough though)
- the shutter speed should be able to be extended to around 30 minutes or even an hour, because I want to try shooting starry skies, although that’s not a necessary requirement
- the camera must not deform after prolonged periods of attaching it to a large and heavy lens and holding only the camera body (I heard that some Nikon cameras are susceptible to this issue, hence this particular requirement stated)
- the camera must not cost more than 830 USD when bought along with a common lens and everything else as a set. The limit can be raised to 950 USD, but only if its additional features and quality are really substantial enough to justify it
- the camera must be similar in size to the E-M5
So far the only reason I’ve chosen Nikon is because I remember that they are famous for the sharp and augmented details in photos, which can be useful for shooting inanimate objects, the only things that I ever shoot. If you have any other brand suggestions that can rival Nikon at it, I’m open to them. I’m also willing to listen to suggestions about mirrorless cameras, if they produce better-quality photos.
It’s also possible that I may not buy a new camera at all (after all, the Olympus is still functioning very well) and buy a single lens instead, so I’d also like to hear suggestions on
what lens is good for shooting objects with a distance of 5 cm (or even less) between it and the front of the lens while maintaining some depth of field. Again, price and quality are the main considerations here, so I hope you won’t suggest an overly expensive and top-of-the-market lens. It should also be completely compatible with the current Olympus camera that I own.
If you think there are any possible significant differences between a Japan-bought camera set and a set bought in HK that may make the camera unusable or unsatisfactory which I should note (such as the electricity plug or the language used in the camera interface), I’d really appreciate it if you can tell me as well. I’m leaving Japan after the 25th of August, so if you have any suggestions, I’d love it if you can post them on or before that date.
Lastly, sorry if some of the requirements sound like ‘common sense’ or if I sound ignorant. That’s probably because I really know next to nothing about DSLRs or cameras in general.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88f4c/88f4c794f46fcc68c5344cc01a97eb0c0ad02bdf" alt="LOL :lol: :lol:"