Tucker Carlson, ladies and gentlemen, and by association the entirety of Fox News's personalities, staff, leadership, and investment groups. Anybody who gives a dollar to this organization gives a dollar to anti-American conspirators who disrespect our military and want to overthrow our government. Unfathomable.
That's the hidden secret; they don't. But, it scares their base into supporting & giving them money.
That's fine but that's not my point. Tuck 'n Cuck isn't just making money off this, he's inciting action. That's a way bigger deal. I don't give a crap how Tucker makes his money, I give a crap about what happens afterward. His position in this Trumpism cult is like some sort of mob boss or something, I don't know. He's a leader and he's spreading dangerous ideas. I don't give a crap how many papers he sells - I believe he could be a dangerous person.
See, Fox News already headed that off as well.
www.businessinsider.com
Where were you 2016 when everyone was crying not my President, calling for an Obama 3rd term and the rioting("protest" domestic terrorism IMO)?
There's literally nothing stopping you from sharing anything about Joe, yourself. Joe and the Democratic politicians have been criticized by folks here. I know Joey, Huske, Danoff, and Keef have made comments questioning Democrat decisions. I guess it's hard to see an equivalency though since Biden doesn't live on Twitter 12 hours a day typing the first thing that comes into his head, therefore "bashing" him isn't as easy. Perhaps that's why the best you had to share about him "being out of touch" was his favorite musician being an old female singer? Shocking news: Old Man likes Old Music.
Fox News. The outrage is on Fox News.
As an observer from afar, my assessment of the Biden situation is that a lot of people voted for 'Uncle Joe' just to get rid of Big Don, not because they actually wanted Joe Biden. Which is completely understandable, most people here think Trump's a complete muppet. It's also very amusing to see people calling Biden and Harris 'far left radicals' and 'socialists', when in reality they're probably more in line with our right wing government here in the UK haha
I can't see the US government investing it any other way than poorly though. Infrastructure would be a good investment, our highway system is pretty awful, we have no high-speed rail service, water delivery is ancient in many areas, bridges are crumbling, Internet distribution is horrible, etc. But even then, they're going to botch it.
This is why I said we can quibble about the details. At the extreme, a lack of infrastructure can cripple an economy. At the other extreme, government spending can feed cronies, net nothing, and result in debt that needs to be paid back from no gains. So the assumption about whether the government can identify and actually act on areas of good return kinda drives whether you think this is a good idea. The return on investment needs to be about 2.3% of the amount borrowed per year (assuming 30 year treasuries). So for example, on $6T that would need to net of about $140B per year. Not exactly a lot, but not zero.
