- 30,000
- a baby, candy, it's like taking.
- TexRex72
It's basically identical to the Norwegian case except Norwegian has the means to fight it. Because of aforementioned judicial doctrine, the threat of revocation of state-issued licenses in lieu of direct monetary penalty isn't a meaningful difference.This has that energy of Florida v. Norwegian Cruise Lines where a judge ruled in favor of the cruise lines specifically citing 1A.
And Florida is already appealing it.
Of course Florida is appealing. They were always going to, no matter how unlikely it is they will win. And because it's performative legislation, even a loss is a win because they get to show their idiot base that they fought tyranny and tyranny won over.
Only...they're the tyrants. They're denying some legitimate freedom in favor of freedom that others don't actually have.