America - The Official Thread

  • Thread starter ///M-Spec
  • 39,899 comments
  • 1,801,571 views
Trumpublicans having a normal one today.

Step 1 - Announce (again) your own free speech social media platform called "TRUTH social":

Step 2 - Include clause that allows you to ban people who say mean things about you:
1634833068744.png


Step 3 - Launch as invite-only, but forget to secure it in any way, allow it to be fully open and have users immediately signing up as "donaldjtrump" with a pinned post of a boy pig laying cable on its own scrotum:

1634833272846.png
 
Gov. Greg Abbott on Thursday appointed John Scott — a Fort Worth attorney who briefly represented former President Donald Trump in a lawsuit challenging the 2020 election results in Pennsylvania — as Texas' new secretary of state.

As secretary of state, Scott would oversee election administration in Texas — a task complicated in recent years by baseless claims of election fraud from Republicans in the highest levels of government, fueled by Trump. The former president has filed a flurry of lawsuits nationwide and called for audits in Texas and elsewhere to review the results of the 2020 presidential elections. Trump’s own attorney general, Bill Barr, said there was no evidence of widespread voter fraud nationwide, and in Texas, an official with the secretary of state’s office said the 2020 election was “smooth and secure.”

Scott could not immediately be reached for comment.

On Nov. 13, Scott signed on as counsel to a lawsuit filed by Trump attempting to block the certification of Pennsylvania's election. A few days later, on the eve of a key hearing in the case, Scott filed a motion to withdraw as an attorney for the plaintiffs. Scott's motion also asked to withdraw Bryan Hughes, a Texas state senator from Mineola who works for Scott's law firm, as an attorney for the case.

The motion said the attorneys had reached a mutual agreement that the plaintiffs would be best served under different representation. Scott's law firm was the second in the span of a few days to withdraw from the case.

Matt Angle, director of the Lone Star Project, which supports Democrats for elected office, said Abbott's "surrender to Donald Trump betrays every Texan."

"Texas' already chaotic Secretary of State's Office will be headed by someone intent on paving the way for Trump's 'Big Lie,'" Angle said in a statement. "By appointing a known vote suppressor to oversee our elections, Abbott is knowingly putting Texas elections in jeopardy and our future at risk just to cruelly hang on to power."

Abbott has not responded to a request for comment on whether Scott's involvement in the lawsuit was a consideration in his appointment.


The top elections position has been open since the end of May, when former Secretary of State Ruth Hughs resigned. Scott will eventually have to be confirmed by the Legislature, which ended a nine-month slog of lawmaking just 10 days ago. The Legislature is not scheduled to meet again until 2023. Until then, Scott will serve as interim secretary of state and will oversee next year's statewide races, in which Abbott will run for reelection.

Abbott's announcement of Scott's appointment did not mention Scott's work for Trump — even as Abbott has endured mounting pressure from Trump supporters to call for an audit of the 2020 elections.

"John Scott is a proven leader with a passion for public service, and his decades of experience in election law and litigation make him the ideal choice for the Texas Secretary of State," Abbott said in a statement. "John understands the importance of protecting the integrity of our elections and building the Texas brand on an international stage. I am confident that John's experience and expertise will enhance his oversight and leadership over the biggest and most thorough election audit in the country."

In September, Trump publicly called on Abbott to add an election audit bill to a 30-day special legislative session even though the former president won in Texas.

A day later, Abbott announced the state was reviewing election results in four Texas counties: Collin, Dallas, Harris and Tarrant. But he has so far resisted pressure to pursue a deeper review.

Scott is no stranger to election law. When Abbott was attorney general, Scott worked under him as a deputy attorney general in 2014, when he defended the state's voter identification law. Federal courts found the law to have discriminatory effects, and a district court also found it intentionally discriminatory.

Eventually, lawmakers had to rewrite the law to address concerns from the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

Scott will also be the state's liaison to Mexico, the state's biggest trading partner, and will advise Abbott on border and trade affairs.

Abbott's last two appointments for the top elections position, Hughs and David Whitley, were not confirmed by the Senate. Hughs resigned in May after the Senate refused to consider her confirmation.

Whitley resigned at the end of the 2019 legislative session after overseeing a botched effort to scour the voter rolls for supposed noncitizen voters. Thousands of naturalized citizens had their right to vote threatened in that effort, which landed in federal courts and prompted a congressional investigation. The state agreed to end that review and paid $450,000 to plaintiffs for attorney's fees in the lawsuits.

Scott has 33 years of legal experience, arguing more than 100 legal cases in state and federal courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court. Working at the attorney general's office under Abbott, Scott was deputy attorney general for civil litigation, overseeing more than 22,000 lawsuits for the state. He later was appointed chief operating officer of the state's Health and Human Services Commission, where he was in charge of 56,000 employees and a biennial budget of $50 billion.

Scott also has served as board chair for the Department of Information Resources. He has law offices in Fort Worth and Austin.
Dirty, dirty dealings are afoot, methinks.
 
You'd think that after the last two or three times a far-right social media hub got defaced and demolished because of poor security THIS YEAR, they'd have the werewithal to find at least one person who knew how to do the bare minimum to keep their little hate club in some order.

Or does "standing up to big tech" entail stubbornly refusing to understand even the basic concepts of how it works? Maybe that's it.
 
Last edited:
You'd think that after the last two or three times a far-right social media hub got defaced and demolished because of poor security THIS YEAR, they'd have the werewithal to find at least one person who knew how to do the bare minimum to keep their little hate club in some order.

Or does "standing up to big tech" entail stubbornly refusing to understand even the basic concepts of how it works? Maybe that's it.
They know they've got stupid people hooked by the lure of a conservative safe space and so they don't have to invest in protections that would normally be expected. Victimhood and grievance are powerful drugs and conservatives are both the volume dealers and the enfeebled junkies.

Relevant to the discussion of this new platform for the Trump kin is the news that the platform isn't new at all. It's just Mastodon in a mask and it may have already violated Mastodon's terms that those who alter its open source software make public those alterations in the spirit of open source. The alternative is that its claims of utilizing proprietary technology are absolute ********, which...I mean...is just pure Trump.

And then there's this:

FCMMU6aVcAA69Fg.jpg


Of course they're just exercising property rights, but I think it's funny that Trump would cry like a little bitch over platforms he utilizes exercising the very same rights. Okay, yeah, that's also pure Trump.
 
Last edited:
Except it is not Republicans reaching riiight into peoples private businesses and telling them what they can/can't do.
dd0.png


Of course, as has already been brought up in response to the inane assertion quoted above, Florida passed a law earlier this year that prohibits private businesses requiring proof of vaccination. If implemented, this measure would further buck said inane assertion.
 
Last edited:
Trumpublicans having a normal one today.

Step 1 - Announce (again) your own free speech social media platform called "TRUTH social":

Step 2 - Include clause that allows you to ban people who say mean things about you:
View attachment 1087845

Step 3 - Launch as invite-only, but forget to secure it in any way, allow it to be fully open and have users immediately signing up as "donaldjtrump" with a pinned post of a boy pig laying cable on its own scrotum:

View attachment 1087846
There isn't even an attempt to make it any different to Twitter; it's levels of copying that would make Chyiyna blush, bigly!

Twitter must be rubbing their hands at an infringement lawsuit.
 
There isn't even an attempt to make it any different to Twitter; it's levels of copying that would make Chyiyna blush, bigly!
Well now, it's interesting you say that, as it turns out that TRUTH Social is owned by the Trump Media & Technology Group, whose CEO is...



... the CEO of Yunhong International (formerly China Yunhong Holdings Ltd), which is a shell company - one that exists solely to acquire and list other companies, also known as a SPAC or a blank-cheque company, with no specific business plan, product or purpose.

And in further "you couldn't make it up" news, that's headquartered in...



... yup, Wuhan.
 
Last edited:
Well now, it's interesting you say that, as it turns out that TRUTH Social is owned by the Trump Media & Technology Group, whose CEO is...



... the CEO of Yunhong International (formerly China Yunhong Holdings Ltd), which is a shell company - one that exists solely to acquire and list other companies, also known as a SPAC or a blank-cheque company, with no specific business plan, product or purpose.

And in further "you couldn't make it up" news, that's headquartered in...



... yup, Wuhan.

Still one of my all time faves:

 
Normal people behaving normally. Language warning, not only due to profanity but also all manner of slurs.

Language. Warning.



"Trump nation, baby!"

The messaging is likely hyperbolic rather than indicative of a legitimate threat (from that individual)--and free speech protections as invoked in the message itself ought to apply--but it's no less contemptible.

There isn't even an attempt to make it any different to Twitter; it's levels of copying that would make Chyiyna blush, bigly!

Twitter must be rubbing their hands at an infringement lawsuit.
I don't imagine Twitter is concerned and there's already precious little variation in the UI between any of these platforms. Anyway, if anyone had a claim to stake it would likely be Mastodon.

Screenshot-20211022-071933-Samsung-Internet.jpg

Well now, it's interesting you say that, as it turns out that TRUTH Social is owned by the Trump Media & Technology Group, whose CEO is...



... the CEO of Yunhong International (formerly China Yunhong Holdings Ltd), which is a shell company - one that exists solely to acquire and list other companies, also known as a SPAC or a blank-cheque company, with no specific business plan, product or purpose.

And in further "you couldn't make it up" news, that's headquartered in...



... yup, Wuhan.

futurama-shocked.gif
 
I don't imagine Twitter is concerned and there's already precious little variation in the UI between any of these platforms. Anyway, if anyone had a claim to stake it would likely be Mastodon.
Today I learned that Mastodon is the name of some open-source software, and not just a Metal band.

Also, what a disgusting person that caller is. Of course, he's utilizing his right to Freedom of Speech, but it does astound me how people can think and talk like that and not realize they're only a couple steps of way from being no different from an Al-Queda member conceptually.
 
SkyWest Airlines experiencing technical difficulties that has resulted in mass cancelation of flights. SkyWest is a regional affiliate of United Airlines whose employees have not been required to be vaccinated against COVID-19 by its parent company.

In no other timeline would these two bits of information together be noteworthy and yet Southwest experiencing such difficulties while following federal vaccine mandates, much to the chagrin of the pilots' union, was a dominant narrative on the right for ~48 hours even while the very same pilots' union came out and said it wasn't to blame.
 
He should emphasise that he prefers African-American to Black, not slur Asian-Americans to make his point.
 
No, and I believe there’s evidence he’s done this before. Why would he even go to the Republicans where he’d be a nobody and have no shot at getting anything he wants if it goes against that party’s desire, either. With the Dems, he actually has power.
 
Last edited:
No, and I believe there’s evidence he’s done this before. Why would he even go to the Republicans where he’d be a nobody and have no shot at getting anything he wants if it goes against that party’s desire, either. With the Dems, he actually has power.
If he switches to Republican, he would be too "blue" to remain as the state's representative, I'd imagine.
 

"Billionaire tax" is a tax on unrealized long term capital gains. Romney says it will push billionaires to buy paintings and housing instead of stocks that will "build jobs". Generally speaking, stock prices going up doesn't "build jobs", unless the company dilutes its stock. I suppose in an even more roundabout way stock price can encourage startups which could "build jobs" at least temporarily. But it's reaching to say that stock prices go up directly translates to economic improvement.

The implications are actually far more reaching than simply pushing investment into collectibles or real-estate. It's a huge depression on the stock market. Billionaires own a lot of stock. As I posted in another thread, 90% of all US stock market holdings are in the possession of 10% of the US population. I'm sure it looks worse when you talk about billionaires only. Imagine 1% of the population holding 70% of all stock, for example (I do not know the actual statistics on this). Forcing a small percentage of the population to sell 30% of their assets to make up captial gains tax will push stock prices down, that stock isn't being sold now, but it will be if they have to cover taxes on appreciation.

I would imagine that this plan would delay IPO, force some companies out of the stock market altogether, and in general make it difficult for company owners to maintain controlling shares after their company goes public.

It's a big change... a landscape change... I wish they were headed in this direction more thoughtfully, more carefully, and maybe with lower initial tax rates until we see what kind of effect it has.
 
Last edited:
For the last month every second ad on YouTube I see is some anti-democrat BS like “they are taking your money” and “they are taking away your insurance “. No positive message from some republican candidate or what they propose they would do to improve things. ****ing annoying! Now they even became unskippable a lot of the time. It’s not even 2022 yet…
 
For the last month every second ad on YouTube I see is some anti-democrat BS like “they are taking your money” and “they are taking away your insurance “. No positive message from some republican candidate or what they propose they would do to improve things. ****ing annoying! Now they even became unskippable a lot of the time. It’s not even 2022 yet…
Big tech censorship of conservative viewpoints.
 
There is resistance on the billionaire tax from Manchin. I would imagine that if it does make it through, it will be less significant than what is currently being proposed.
 
Back