CodeRedR51
Premium
- 55,307
- United States
Never mind, not worth it. I'm just going to end it here. In many ways. So long everyone. Its been real.
Last edited:
Well, it will essentially split the Republicans so they might as well name the 3rd party the Magaricans.Me, wanting a viable third party...
Maybe the MAGAs will secede from the globalist uniparty RINOs and form a Trump party. The New Know-Nothings.
Joey's third party springs up and immediately results in the most single-partied government in US history lol.Me, wanting a viable third party...
Republicans are like a dog chasing a car - they have no idea what to do with it when they actually catch it.
The reference to the joker seems apt.Republicans are like a dog chasing a car - they have no idea what to do with it when they actually catch it.
A raucous in the caucus?Is it possible that the Democratic party could influence the House Speaker ? Like if they all voted for a candidate that could just get 20 GOP members to support? I don't remember the protocol.
Seems possibleIs it possible that the Democratic party could influence the House Speaker ? Like if they all voted for a candidate that could just get 20 GOP members to support? I don't remember the protocol.
I am solely convinced half of these people have no idea what the job entails and the Peter principle should apply.@Blitz24
For a while sure, but the GOP will eventually consolidate around somebody. If that somebody has promised fringe extremists committee assignments in exchange for speaker votes, it may be in the Dem's best interest to pre-empt those deals to keep said extremists off committees. It could also further tear the GOP apart, which could be useful.
As far as I've read (which is not very far), the democrats have their preferred candidate and are good with voting as a block. As much difficulty as the republicans are having getting on board with one candidate, switching people and getting all of the democrats to vote as a block for a new candidate which the right number of republicans support seems like a very tall order. There are a lot of people involved.@Blitz24
For a while sure, but the GOP will eventually consolidate around somebody. If that somebody has promised fringe extremists committee assignments in exchange for speaker votes, it may be in the Dem's best interest to pre-empt those deals to keep said extremists off committees. It could also further tear the GOP apart, which could be useful.
It's kind of amazing progressives support Jeffries, even if begrudgingly.As far as I've read (which is not very far), the democrats have their preferred candidate and are good with voting as a block.
Good bet any Republicans who voted for a Democrat to be Speaker would be penalized by the party, much like those who voted to impeach Trump.Getting a few republicans to bail and vote for the democrat candidate might just be easier (but also unlikely), especially if the fringe is gaining control over the republican speaker.
From the Politico article:It's kind of amazing progressives support Jeffries, even if begrudgingly.
Good bet any Republicans who voted for a Democrat to be Speaker would be penalized by the party, much like those who voted to impeach Trump.
There are reports some Democratic members will abstain from the next ballot due to the stupidity on the right. Of course that would also be stupid, thus very much on-brand.From the Politico article:
He added that Monday night, conservatives told him “the only way to get 218 votes was if I provided certain members with certain positions, certain gavels … and they even came to the position where Matt Gaetz said: ‘I don’t care if we go to plurality and we elect [incoming House Democratic leader] Hakeem Jeffries.’”
Probably won't happen, but they did threaten going to plurality over this. They will most likely make a deal before it gets there.
According to cbsnews.com, Jeffries did receive one less vote in the 3rd voting session, while McCarthy lost one vote to Jordan compared to previous sessions.There are reports some Democratic members will abstain from the next ballot due to the stupidity on the right. Of course that would also be stupid, thus very much on-brand.
I'm sorry to say but the chance of a right-libertarian party that's totally fine with the oh-so-decadent gay marriage, transgender freedoms, drug legalization, and abstinence from the cultural war altogether making it into the mainstream, is less than zero.Me, wanting a viable third party...