McLaren
Premium
- 45,597
- Texas
Sure it is.
Since we've cemented this discussion is a few rungs above yourself to actually engage in, you can run along back to the GT section now.
Sure it is.
Kinda played yourself there.It looks an awful lot like you’re making fun of the mentally handicapped with this post. That’s not very tolerant of you.
I'm making fun of you. The mentally handicapped put up a better debate than you have.It looks an awful lot like you’re making fun of the mentally handicapped with this post. That’s not very tolerant of you.
I'm making fun of you. The mentally handicapped put up a better debate than you have.
You're kind of telling on yourself there, equating stupidity with disability.a deeply offensive caricature of a disabled person
I mean, if that's what you see when you look at it, it does say something about you. I did mention that you were playing yourself.You posted an image of someone doing a deeply offensive caricature of a disabled person, as a personal attack on another member of the forum. That breaks at least a couple of this site’s rules.
Meanwhile, here's an actually deeply offensive caricature of a (specific) disabled person:
But he's your guy, right?[/color][/b]
You're literally just saying you're a troll.YES! That is exactly who I want to see as the next president, precisely because of stuff like this.
Precisely because he openly mocks the disabled, having just determined that something you thought was mocking the disabled (but wasn't) was so offensive you felt the need to report it?YES! That is exactly who I want to see as the next president, precisely because of stuff like this.
Where was Rowan Atkinson on the night of the Los Santos riots, anyway?
Precisely because he openly mocks the disabled, having just determined that something you thought was mocking the disabled (but wasn't) was so offensive you felt the need to report it?
You're just contradicting yourself over and over again, and there's no way you can reconcile even successive posts.
Rule #1 - You WILL NOT violate the AUP. No swearing, no personal attacks, no broad sweeping generalizations about Americans, Arabs, Muslims, Christians or any group. It will not be tolerated and offenders will be warned. Repeat offenders will be subject to administrative discipline up to and including banning.
Deflection - and that quoted paragraph is both irrelevant and isn't even part of our site rules.I reported it for breaking the site’s rules.
Deflection - and that quoted paragraph is both irrelevant and isn't even part of our site rules.
Are you going to stop trolling and fabricating things any time soon?
I was mocking you
Which you know it isn't.If that quoted paragraph isn’t part of the site rules,
I think just on a matter of technicality, not while the main candidates are presumptive.The Britain thread has a "how will you vote in the upcoming election?" poll. Should this one, too?
Edit: or in the 2024 Election thread, probably.
That was quick.Which you know it isn't.
And I'll take that as your answer.
Edit: Oh no, too many points. Anyway.
🤣DucksDucksGone
Jon Stewart crushing it (again). Some bad language but he is great here - the court system is the MAGA republican's worst enemy because it requires actual evidence.
”The superintendent did not accept the book.”Well done!!!!!!!
Banned book given to school superintendent during graduation ceremony
A school superintendent was given a banned book at a graduation ceremony.www.waff.com
He came there to lead, not to read.”The superintendent did not accept the book.”
Of course not. We can’t have a school superintendent learning something.