- 688
- United Kingdom
America - The Official Thread
- Thread starter ///M-Spec
- 39,568 comments
- 1,785,205 views
- 20,979
- NJ/USA
- Blitzbay
- Blitzbay
Since he doesn't speak out against it and he sees how his followers act, yes he is.
- 87,503
- Rule 12
- GTP_Famine
<<gestures at everything said from 2015-present and everything done from 2017-2021>>
Danoff
Premium
- 34,031
- Mile High City
Putin is ultimately how this ends up. Do you think that what's going on in Russia and Ukraine is funny? That is precisely how this goes, except in America, with more nukes.
- 688
- United Kingdom
Danoff
Premium
- 34,031
- Mile High City
Swing and a hard miss.
- 87,503
- Rule 12
- GTP_Famine
I imagine it probably does, given how quickly you dismissed my earlier post.
UKMikey
Premium
- 18,375
- Grea'er Laandan
- UKMikeyA
- UKMikeyA
To MAGA, diversity, equality and inclusion are dirty words. The only racism Trump acknowledges is against white people.
Donald Trump was accused of racism long before his presidency, despite what online posts claim
CLAIM: Donald Trump was never called a racist until he ran for president.
apnews.com
He's persistently eroded LGBTQ people's rights:
The Real List of Trump’s “Unprecedented Steps” for the LGBTQ Community
Post submitted by Lucas Acosta (he/him), former Deputy Director of Communications, Politics HRC lists Trump's persistent attacks against the LGBTQ…
Last edited:
- 20,979
- NJ/USA
- Blitzbay
- Blitzbay
His first term will be tame in relation to if he wins in November. Literally the worst scenario is if he picks one of his unhinged idiot supporters as his VP and dies while in office. I don't think the country will be able to handle one of those. It won't be able to handle one of him.
- 3,196
- Hong Kong
- Hybrid_Tifoso
I feel like I’m gonna regret replying for one reason or another, but I can’t help but challenge this opinion of yours:
So if given the vote, you’d prefer to elect a person who decides in his life to be an idiot into public office but not someone who has no choice but to live with it? How much of an importance do you even place on voting?
- 688
- United Kingdom
NVM
Last edited:
- 20,979
- NJ/USA
- Blitzbay
- Blitzbay
Plus Trump constantly believes the law doesn't apply to him. If he gets told no, he will throw a temper tantrum and will whine about it on social media. If he only knew how to NOT say whatever thought came into his head immediately.
- 688
- United Kingdom
Very little, almost none. You know the president doesn’t actually make any decisions, right? Or do you think Biden, who can’t even string a sentence together, barely even knows where he is half the time, is right now making critical decisions on foreign policy, the economy and the law? He doesn’t even get asked for his opinion.
It’s all bread and circuses, this is known, it’s not even a secret, and yet everyone carries on with it anyway. At the very least, Trump is by far the most entertaining president the USA has ever had, by a mile. He is so incomprehensibly idiotic, it’s just brilliant. And the absolute meltdown the left will have over his reinstatement would be the icing on the cake.
And those same bleeding heart liberals accusing me of wanting to kill gay people and brown people and women because I have these opinions makes it even funnier. Because it’s all so ridiculous.
Last edited:
- 29,935
- Bratvegas
- GTP_Liquid
In one way, I wish I had such a relaxed attitude to life where nothing of consequence matters. In another way, I feel sorry for you.
- 688
- United Kingdom
- 87,503
- Rule 12
- GTP_Famine
If you're going to refer to previous posts, don't paraphrase - because you end up saying stuff that isn't true.
Trump’s "presidency" killed a million people more than expected, and quite deliberately packed SCOTUS to allow an attack on Roe vs Wade in order to strip women (in red states) of reproductive rights. And it succeeded. The original ruling was predicated on the same judgment that prevented states making laws against gay marriage, interracial marriage, and contraception, and these are next in line on the same basis.
If you have no problem with that because you think he made funny Tweets (and he doesn't do that now; he uses his Truth Social platform), then you have no problem with swathes of people dying through incompetent leadership, and the stripping of women's rights, gay rights, and black rights, because the lolz.
And that's your choice. Abhorrent as it is.
- 35,416
- Downtown North Dakota
- Cy-Fi
And yet you're still sharing yours.
As for the President just being a figurehead, that would be your monarchy.
- 688
- United Kingdom
- 87,503
- Rule 12
- GTP_Famine
Nice deflection. The question is why you're okay with it all.
McLaren
Premium
- 45,597
- Texas
Women's Rights is a back-and-forth issue with him, currently. He has been against a federal abortion ban & for it. He has been for women in military and yet, blamed women for sexual assault cases in the military. However, he rescinded the program that monitors wage gap data & implemented the Mexico City policy which is anti-abortion, so it's quite clear where he stands on women's rights.
Anti-white rhetoric is huge in Trump's circle. His rallies often resort to blaming minorities of any origin; he recently just said Chinese migrants of "fighting age" are coming here, insinuating China would attack the country from within'. This exact same rhetoric led to Anti-Asian crime with constantly blaming China for Covid-19. He is against any program that attempts to highlight racial inequality & injustice in America, openly trying to remove it from even being taught.
There is an entire Wiki entry that highlights Trump's racism, in-and-out of office, before-and-after he took office.
They highlighted your ignorance on Trump's stance regarding those topics because you're attempting come across as some centrist who doesn't like either.
That said, do you have to catch your breath or do you have zero gag reflex whilst you're deep throating a blatant right wing "debate" approach?
I think the first term solidified that. Only his cult & die-hard Republicans don't want to acknowledge that.
- 688
- United Kingdom
- 87,503
- Rule 12
- GTP_Famine
I hope there are no women in your life who will suffer from this attitude.
It's repugnant that you have such contempt for women's bodily autonomy.
You don't get to speak for me, especially when you're making up drivel like this.
Even a cursory search of this thread would reveal how inaccurate it is.
- 688
- United Kingdom
- 3,196
- Hong Kong
- Hybrid_Tifoso
I highly doubt the American system of government would actually place such an emphasis on the role and grant it with so many powers, if it’s only a ceremonious figurehead. I’m not really knowledgeable at all in American politics (even call me out-of-loop), but AFAIK the president gets to veto bills passed by Congress, which is made up of legislators from all 50 states.
Just because “everyone” is carrying on with their lives, it doesn’t mean their lives aren’t impacted by their vote, even if only extremely slightly. Much less the potential consequences.
So somebody who couldn’t care less about democracies and how civil societies work, then.
Edit: My previous post was not intended to disparage you. If anything, I was just trying to remark that democracies depend on the voting population to make their preferences heard after careful consideration and deliberation of the available choices (with the constituting individuals’ principles being at times vastly different) to survive. Said principles may seem unfathomable to others, but that’s where discussions come in if one is willing. But the reason why you’d prefer Trump to be elected (pure hilarity) doesn’t seem to even qualify as one of good faith.
Last edited:
McLaren
Premium
- 45,597
- Texas
You right-wingers that come in here are hilarious inept at discussion.
Every so often, you & one of the other 2 or 3 others come into this section because of a major event, spout off low IQ takes & then proceed to hilariously spiral downwards from backing up your drivel into just off-topic, irrelevant, and whataboutism remarks.
How even more so ironic that in the Russia thread, you spouted off sympathy for Russian military deaths yet you're in here saying you don't actually give a toss about the implications for a society in regards to one candidate or another's policies.
Last edited:
- 87,503
- Rule 12
- GTP_Famine
You may be limited to doing one thing at a time, but I'm not.
If you don't think bodily autonomy should be respected, there's little point in conversing further with you, because that's such a fundamental concept to all our rights and laws with respect to them that it's impossible to find any common ground.
You either believe this and are as awful as you are coming across, or you don't and are trolling - which amounts to the same thing.
- 688
- United Kingdom
McLaren
Premium
- 45,597
- Texas
Because the women affected by US policy are actually innocent unlike Russian soldiers....
No, he's against Jews as well. Jews who don't vote for him are against their faith according to him.
US Jews upset with Trump's latest rhetoric say he doesn't get to tell them how to be Jewish
Many Jewish faith leaders and commentators are decrying what they say are inflammatory remarks by Donald Trump.
apnews.com
