- 5,051
- Netherlands
You mean historically or modern times?I don't think you understood my point so I'll rephrase it.
Europe doesn't seem to have as many people wanting and willing to kill other people, why do you think that is?
You mean historically or modern times?I don't think you understood my point so I'll rephrase it.
Europe doesn't seem to have as many people wanting and willing to kill other people, why do you think that is?
You mean historically or modern times?
My state "recently" spent over $100 million to develop a new drivers license system, it's been such a colossal failure that the only solution is apparently spending another $73 million on a privately developed system.
https://www.kare11.com/article/news...tware/89-ef5f2bed-eb6b-4b5a-9377-647c96e20ad7
Yay government!!!!
Barr refuses to answer subpoenas, refuses to testify, refuses to show up, and is trying to obstruct any and every attempt at investigation. Congress is enraged, threatening contempt charges and impeachment of the attorney general. All of this is political and legal theater at its best, distracting from Trump, and tempting Democrats to go off the rails on a bunny chase. "Sound and fury, signifying nothing", as The Bard has said.Any inside scoop from our American members on why Attorney General Barr refuses to testify before Congress? I'm reading this deliberate stonewalling of the Congress means he himself could be held in contempt.
It's a conflict - really a pitched fight for life or death - between the Executive Branch and the Legislative Branch, equal branches of government in a tripartite system. It might (but won't) be resolved politically, so the only legal remedy is through the Judicial Branch. Don't hold your breath.Yes but to what end? Why?
The narrative from the Attorney General appears to be "we don't want to pursue the obstruction of justice line of investigation because there might be something to it and that will make the office of President look weak and be diplomatically embarrassing even though upholding the constitution and justice is supposed to go above protecting any one person".
Or am I missing something?
My state "recently" spent over $100 million to develop a new drivers license system, it's been such a colossal failure that the only solution is apparently spending another $73 million on a privately developed system.
https://www.kare11.com/article/news...tware/89-ef5f2bed-eb6b-4b5a-9377-647c96e20ad7
Yay government!!!!
Modern times. You can't just blame guns either as guns don't suddenly fill you with the urge to kill, nor are they the only way to end someone's life.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_intentional_homicide_rate#UNODC's_global_study
My state "recently" spent over $100 million to develop a new drivers license system, it's been such a colossal failure that the only solution is apparently spending another $73 million on a privately developed system.
https://www.kare11.com/article/news...tware/89-ef5f2bed-eb6b-4b5a-9377-647c96e20ad7
Yay government!!!!
They're going to specifically have guns in the classroom or classroom staff are allowed access to guns at a different location in the school?
Guns in the classroom.
Vision through a glass darkly: All Christian and NRA-trained children in the classrooms will also be armed, so the armed teachers will have allies close at hand. Any drug-addled miscreant foolish enough to shoot school kids in the future will gunned down in righteous crossfire.
America is on the verge of massive change. Young people are demanding that images of founding fathers Thomas Jefferson and George Washington be removed. Polls indicate majorities of the people of both major parties plus Independents want change to a wholly new form of government. Agreement on that form is totally lacking. Since our Constitution is set in stone and cannot be changed without overwhelmingly massive agreement, this means revolutionary or extralegal change is in the air. This will set in motion extreme violence for which everyone will be armed to the teeth. We need guns now like we never have before.I'd like to apply my own litmus paper test to this:
Take any news story from a supposedly progressive, first-world country and change the location to somewhere perceived as less desirable, less safe and not as peaceful or a combination of all three. If the story fits the perceived narrative of the less stable countries and makes the first-world country sound like a dystopian backwater, you've gone wrong somewhere.
Iraq allows armed teachers in its classrooms
Venezuela allows armed teachers in its classrooms
Libya allows armed teachers in its classrooms
Sounds bad as an outsider, doesn't it?
Guns in the classroom.
Iraq allows armed teachers in its classrooms
Venezuela allows armed teachers in its classrooms
Libya allows armed teachers in its classrooms
Better for whom?
I wouldn't be suprised if y'all still thought it was a good idea to give them those pallets of money...
https://www.foxnews.com/us/u-s-depl...an-trump-says-no-do-overs-for-dems-on-mueller