It was a conspiracy which originated from the Alt-Right from the beginning. They tried to say that Hillary’s “odd laughter” and “seizures” which weren’t even seizures, are proof that she is seriously unwell. Couldn’t be more obvious that it was manufactured. All they did was exaggerate otherwise normal behavior of a 70 year old woman.
I remember this from 2016:
What?!
Look up on YouTube “Paul Joseph Watson” and there’s a few videos about why he claims Hillary is on her last leg. Mind you, he’s a part of the Alt-Right and one of Alex Jones’ minions, also one of the most vocally Islamophobic conservatives at the moment.
The NY Times reported Mrs . Clinton suffered from pneumonia and an inner ear infection during 2016.
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/19/us/politics/hillary-clinton-health.html
Oh I'm well aware of what it accomplishes. I was gerrymandered in ~2003 in a manner that I suppose benefitted me as a Democrat (both parties are guilty of it) but that offended and still offends me as an American. I don't approve of it just as I don't approve of the Electoral College.
That’s truly awful! Makes me proud to be a New Jerseyan. All of our districts are at least somewhat close to equal.Oh I'm well aware of what it accomplishes. I was gerrymandered in ~2003 in a manner that I suppose benefitted me as a Democrat (both parties are guilty of it) but that offended and still offends me as an American. I don't approve of it just as I don't approve of the Electoral College.
[Edit] Look at this crock of crap:
That's not a meandering river; that's a legislative district.
[Subsequent edit to replace the previous image with one of higher quality and that offers more information.]
The 8th would like to have a word with you.
True, although I'm over 70 and have never suffered any of Mrs. Clinton's medical problems. In 2012 she was treated for blood clots in the brain after fainting and suffering a concussion. That said, my issue with her was not her health but her foreign policy of military intervention. As an antiwar libertarian, that's a big deal for me. This time around, I'm looking forward to Tulsi Gabbard carrying the antiwar theme in the Democratic Party. I wish her every success.
The 2011 Egyptian protests posed the most challenging foreign policy crisis for the administration yet.[358] Clinton's public response quickly evolved from an early assessment that the government of Hosni Mubarak was "stable", to a stance that there needed to be an "orderly transition [to] a democratic participatory government", to a condemnation of violence against the protesters.[359][360] Obama came to rely upon Clinton's advice, organization and personal connections in the behind-the-scenes response to developments.[358] As Arab Spring protests spread throughout the region, Clinton was at the forefront of a U.S. response that she recognized was sometimes contradictory, backing some regimes while supporting protesters against others.[361]
The London meeting to discuss NATO military intervention in Libya, March 29, 2011
As the Libyan Civil War took place, Clinton's shift in favor of military intervention aligned her with Ambassador to the UN Susan Rice and National Security Council figure Samantha Power and was a key turning point in overcoming internal administration opposition from Defense Secretary Gates, security advisor Thomas E. Donilon and counterterrorism advisor John Brennan in gaining the backing for and Arab and U.N. approval of, the 2011 military intervention in Libya.[361][362][363] Secretary Clinton testified to Congress that the administration did not need congressional authorization for its military intervention in Libya, despite objections from some members of both parties that the administration was violating the War Powers Resolution and the State Department's legal advisor argued the same when the Resolution's 60-day limit for unauthorized wars was passed (a view that prevailed in a legal debate within the Obama administration).[364] Clinton later used U.S. allies and what she called "convening power" to promote unity among the Libyan rebels as they eventually overthrew the Gaddafi regime.[362] The aftermath of the Libyan Civil War saw the country becoming a failed state,[365] and the wisdom of the intervention and interpretation of what happened afterward would become the subject of considerable debate.[366][367][368]
Bit of a stretch. But even if I give you that, suppose we compare Middlesex and Monmouth counties to the 6th:
Yea I’ll give you that one. The district that covers most of Monmouth County is NJ’s only Republican district. The towns in Monmouth County in the district you highlighted are the only towns in that county which lean left. Monmouth County is not like the rest of NJ from a geographical and political standpoint.Bit of a stretch. But even if I give you that, suppose we compare Middlesex and Monmouth counties to the 6th:
It's a joke. I could practically spit across part of it.
Gerrymandering is a CANCER. It is not in service to the American people. And make no mistake, it's not unique to any particular part of the country or any political party, no matter how much you or anybody else wants it to be.
Oh I totally agree. But in the case of NJ, to be totally honest, people generally approve of our gerrymandered districts. Why? NJ is a state that is largely left-leaning with Conservatives being a minority. 11/12 of our districts are blue. Though it is still gerrymandering, most of our state is happy with our districts at least.
That doesn't make it right.
.jpg)
