- 29,636
- Bratvegas
- GTP_Liquid
Do you really think the Republican Party has it in them to revoke, remove or supersede the twenty-second amendment? Let us not forget that it was the Republican Party who proposed, drafted, amended and introduced the twenty-second amendment as a response to FDR exceeding the two-term "limit" which was, at that time, merely an unwritten gentleman's agreement.
I wouldn't want to paint it only as the Republicans spiting a four-term Democrat, other Republican Presidents like Ulysses Grant and Teddy Roosevelt attempted and/or considered to run for a third term, but them introducing it to spite a Democrat President given that FDR hadn't actually broken any laws and and hypothetically editing it to satiate a Republican President would be highly... coincidental.
Some 19th century figures such as President James Madison and Treasury Secretary Alexander Hamilton did favour winning the Presidency being a for-life appointment. Others were vehemently against it as being tantamount to an elective monarchy.
I wouldn't want to paint it only as the Republicans spiting a four-term Democrat, other Republican Presidents like Ulysses Grant and Teddy Roosevelt attempted and/or considered to run for a third term, but them introducing it to spite a Democrat President given that FDR hadn't actually broken any laws and and hypothetically editing it to satiate a Republican President would be highly... coincidental.
Some 19th century figures such as President James Madison and Treasury Secretary Alexander Hamilton did favour winning the Presidency being a for-life appointment. Others were vehemently against it as being tantamount to an elective monarchy.
Thomas JeffersonIf some termination to the services of the chief magistrate be not fixed by the Constitution, or supplied by practice, his office, nominally for years, will in fact, become for life; and history shows how easily that degenerates into an inheritance