Assetto Corsa PC Mods General DiscussionPC
- Thread starter daan
- 137,906 comments
- 37,391,452 views
- 26
- United Kingdom
- 504
- Germany
Cams for Olavarria Track.
Thanks to damone13x for the track.
Thanks to imported_ApexVGear for posting the track.
Have Fun.
- 2,156
- Helsinki
Can't tell with freaking broadband, quick as a flash... but yeah, that is a lot... Imagine anyone nowdays with dial-up...
BTW, still need to catch up and drive your Alfa 'G' release version for some constructive feedback...
So much good feedback about 99c, which was not "perfect spec suspension (and received complaints from 2 people who drive with controllers, but know lots about physics, and how my inaccuracies let the car down)", Another tried to compare my physics to the rF2 version, acting like I disrespected the original work. The rF2 has physics so bad the car is not driveable, has no semblance of a real spec anywhere and the model was 12% too big.
I have been tempted to release an optional data.acd based on v0.99c
Will be nice to hear your feedback, thanks
- 26
- United Kingdom
This will probs sound like a pretty dumb question, but where typically would you find the torque figures in the car data files??? perfectly well acquainted with power figures, but torque is seemingly absent from my looking.
- 2,156
- Helsinki
link fixed for Loch Rannoch
(sorry it was those adverts loading up my laptop)
to be honest, when I clicked the link in the quote, it was there and worked.
thus was my response! But clearly your second quote the link was missing and from the post!
Track is loading without issues in both CM and AC launcher for me
(sorry it was those adverts loading up my laptop)
to be honest, when I clicked the link in the quote, it was there and worked.
thus was my response! But clearly your second quote the link was missing and from the post!
Track is loading without issues in both CM and AC launcher for me
Last edited:
- 2,156
- Helsinki
2 files:
engine,ini and power.lut
every dyno sheet should show torque. Google images is your friend here
Unfortunately its not easy to extrapolate 1 figure to a curve from a standard spec listing, however you will know 2 things:
example engine spec:
300nm Torque @ 4000rpm
400hp @ 8000 rpm
1. your torque figure can never exceed 300mn before or after that 4000rpm
2. same for HP.
I use the CM curve generator for visualization and hand edit my curves
but some people use https://acstuff.ru/u/torque-helper/
note: be sure to set powerloss, i think that calc uses 30% which is rather high even for a 4wd street car. I use 13% as a rule
Last edited:
- 26
- United Kingdom
ah, so it's kind of relative all other things regarding power and TL then? thanks for that! i was starting to question my sanity regarding that a little bit.
it also doesn't help when some mods have figures that are wildly inaccurate to reality. like the AG/Assettoland Marcos LM 600 GT2 (The car which spurned this question) was about 200kg overweight and 60-75hp of of the real thing.
- 109
- Croatia
Sol 2.0 is out!
https://www.racedepartment.com/threads/sol.163844/
I have 2.0 rc4 from this forum do I need to install this public 2.0 or its the same thing?
Thanks!
https://www.racedepartment.com/threads/sol.163844/
I have 2.0 rc4 from this forum do I need to install this public 2.0 or its the same thing?
Thanks!
- 36,616
- Scotland
- GTP_daan
You've moaned about it in this thread but I don't see a complaint about it.
You also can't expect the site owner to see every single post in every single forum.
Comments, complaints and suggestions concerning GTPlanet go here.
https://www.gtplanet.net/forum/board/site-support.5/
- 23
- Chile
Dears, thank you for naming the AERO 8 GT2, but I think we all know the GT2 car from assettoland. Instead the car I mentioned is a GT3
To be exact it is an AERO 8 SUPERSPORTS GT3 (2009)
And it looks much better than the old GT2 (without detracting)
The GT3 version has 731,000 polygons.
- 1,362
Niiice!
The track was posted by @RobertFlagg. Credit goes to him (not me).
https://www.gtplanet.net/forum/thre...ral-discussion.307899/page-2019#post-13307195
Thanks @damone13x, that's a good job and the track is fun to drive, I noticed though there's no pit_lane file in the ai folder, could this be fixed?
Last edited:
- 260
In RaceDepartment you can always download prior versions of mods. Check the "History" tab: https://www.racedepartment.com/downloads/sol.24914/history
- 226
- Mexico
Racedepartment keeps an archive of every version uploaded for every mod:
https://www.racedepartment.com/downloads/sol.24914/history
Last edited:
- 233
- Greece
I feel like I need to comment on this, since I already have commented about the c and d versions of the car. 0.99g is very very good, best of both worlds.
Main "problem" for me is the difference at the brake feeling. c version had more "immediate" brake feeling, that first bite of the brakes you could feel it when you slightly press them on a 670Kgr car in order to maintain speed and to position the car before the corner. g version needs more press in order to return the correct feeling. Of course it is also a matter of equipment. I am using the T3GT pedal set with brake mod installed, if this will make any difference to your approach, or will help you understand what I am talking about.
In any case the car is a pure beast and is always fun to drive it - at 0.99c & 0.99g versions.
P.S. Negative feedbacks will always be present, mainly from users with gamepads, because in our case i.e. a slight press at the gamepad will result to instant lock of the brakes. They are the same testers I believe that lead modders of GT3 cars with giant ceramic brakes to calibrate them in a way that when you press the brakes at 200 km/h to get the feeling that you have drum brakes all around.......
Last edited:
Similar threads
