That was a mini game released some ages ago. Can get it here: http://classicmotorsporthub.org:200/BMW M3 CHALLENGE/I just tried the track again with some different cars to check...
I feel absolutely no weird bumps (on a Simucube DD wheel).
@Rainmaker87 in the ui of the updated Detroit: BMW M3 Challenge by Ronnie82, AC by Rainmaker ??
I've sent your report to the original author he may have a look into it.Okay mate thanks for that, idk why but I did feel some bumps in the last corner especially but might just be the car.
Is there any possibility that you could do some re-curbing?
https://www.racedepartment.com/downloads/lemans-1966-lm-start-extension.62771/hi guys
a request for Mitch9
is it possible to upload le grand circuit 67 with 54 pits and le mans classic start?
Thanks!
And David Perel's saying the opposite, but who's right and who's wrong ? At the end of the day the GT3 physics are even more lacklustre in AC.
What both of you don't understand is the FACT that here, in this AC thread, there's many people happy with AC ; even with GT3 cars.Basically if you want to drive GT3 cars, you should only drive in ACC and only on its tracks, and no point doing that anywhere else. If you want to drive in places they don't have, too bad take a hike.
And David Perel's saying the opposite, but who's right and who's wrong ? At the end of the day the GT3 physics are even more lacklustre in AC.
4000 pages ...![]()
![]()
To all who have helped improve our hobby, a big fat thanks you!!!!
Cheers you all...![]()
FYI I should put a /s tag on my post I guess...What both of you don't understand is the FACT that here, in this AC thread, there's many people happy with AC ; even with GT3 cars.
The may have some reasons not obvious to you ; but that's the facts.
Then, you come here and tell them they're wrong. So who are you ?
And what do you want apart proving to yourself ACC is better ?
Errr... what flavor, dog testicles? Or we can choose? 😅... 4000 pages, we have to celebrate! Who wants some cake?![]()
That depends which gt3 you look at. If you compare kunos gt3 (AC) to kunos GT3 (ACC) then sure. If you look at a cphys gt3 e.g., bk audi r8 vs. kunos gt3 (ACC), the latter is far worseAt the end of the day the GT3 physics are even more lacklustre in AC.
So it's for low track grip conditions? Testing against AI opponents, 5 lap race at 100% track grip there wasn't much difference. Good to know.More grip = better handling but slower pace (more effort is needed to push the car)
Test on "Slow (96%)" track condition :
View attachment 1277689View attachment 1277690
I used to barely touch ACC over the last months and gave it a try this morning. As a result, I uninstalled it!Basically if you want to drive GT3 cars, you should only drive in ACC and only on its tracks, and no point doing that anywhere else. If you want to drive in places they don't have, too bad take a hike.
Err how do you read beyond the last page, unless you have a time machine of course 😉I guess I underestimated how little people actually read beyond the last page in a thread....
Hi and thank you for these great updates of these modsNew test versions of the Marcos Mantis and Gillet Vertigo v2.01:
Gillet Vertigo v2.01 (Test version, car is still W.I.P.)
Download:![]()
126.75 MB file on MEGA
mega.nz
Changelog:
- no LODS
- only 3 skins for now (more will come with final release)
- physics and BoP is still w.i.p.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- new rollcage
- optimised shader settings
- tires not floating anymore
- edited interior on drivers side
- optimised driver animation
- replaced pedals
- added new sound
Marcos Mantis GT3 v2.01 (Test version, car is still W.I.P.)
Download:![]()
77.17 MB file on MEGA
mega.nz
known bugs or need to be fixed:
Changelog:
- only 3 skins for now (more will come with final release)
- no LODS
- physics and BoP is still w.i.p.
- optimised circular hood apertures
- optimised shader settings
- changed to six-speed gear Box
- internal windshield Banner is mirrored now



I can't help but think that the exact opposite is true. There isn't a person in this forum right now who hasn't started a race in AC only to have it crash and say "Race Ended" with some hooey fooey script prompting a search for whatever culprit it may be. Not to mention AC being "The Real Text File Editing Simulator". lolBecause ACC is kind of a PITA to use?
You're going to want AMS2 installed on an internal NVME or SSD at the very least or connected at parallel speeds. It can suffer from stuttering in some cases if not.Hello to everyone...I have a question that I hope someone can answer...I installed a 1TG SSD drive in my laptop. I have used up a great deal of storage and I was wondering, can I load ACC and AM2 on an external hard drive and play them on my laptop, or do they need to be loaded onto the internal hard drive in order to work properly? Thank you in advance for any answers or advice.
Picking low hanging fruit from one driver doesn't regard the fact that many real drivers not only use ACC but helped in the feedback of making ACC and are very happy with the results.check out daniel morad. he is a gt3 driver and he says ACC is not great. He should know he does this in real life.....................
Far worse? You believe that? The tire model alone is leagues better in ACC. There's things you just can't do in AC. You can still have a whole heap of fun in AC but that's an odd argument to try and say that the physics for a car on Kunos own updated physics engine are far worse than the one they made ten years ago. The video's that Kunos put out on the physics of ACC that Aris does are quite fascinating. If you like that sort of thing.If you look at a cphys gt3 e.g., bk audi r8 vs. kunos gt3 (ACC), the latter is far worse




i am not picking low hanging fruit i am simply sharing an opinion from a gt driver. i am sorry that opinion does not fit what you think but to call it low hanging because you don't agree with it? c'mon man. This just states my point in an earlier post-----tribalismI can't help but think that the exact opposite is true. There isn't a person in this forum right now who hasn't started a race in AC only to have it crash and say "Race Ended" with some hooey fooey script prompting a search for whatever culprit it may be. Not to mention AC being "The Real Text File Editing Simulator". lol
You're going to want AMS2 installed on an internal NVME or SSD at the very least or connected at parallel speeds. It can suffer from stuttering in some cases if not.
Picking low hanging fruit from one driver doesn't regard the fact that many real drivers not only use ACC but helped in the feedback of making ACC and are very happy with the results.
Far worse? You believe that? The tire model alone is leagues better in ACC. There's things you just can't do in AC. You can still have a whole heap of fun in AC but that's an odd argument to try and say that the physics for a car on Kunos own updated physics engine are far worse than the one they made ten years ago. The video's that Kunos put out on the physics of ACC that Aris does are quite fascinating. If you like that sort of thing.
With optimum track condition, you can see a little difference in laptime ; ~0.1s.So it's for low track grip conditions? Testing against AI opponents, 5 lap race at 100% track grip there wasn't much difference. Good to know.
Tribalism. You posted one persons opinion that was negative because it fit a narrative. Let me find 12 GT3 drivers yootoob videos where they all love ACC then. Right?i am not picking low hanging fruit i am simply sharing an opinion from a gt driver. i am sorry that opinion does not fit what you think but to call it low hanging because you don't agree with it? c'mon man. This just states my point in an earlier post-----tribalism
like i have stated a few times already in previous post's, i can find loads of uuuuttuuuube vid's of gt3 drivers saying the contary does that mean they are correct? does that mean the people you find are correct? no. It means they have an opinion. I just find it a little strange why you would call it "low hanging fruit", its just a video, if i had of picked a video that was the opposite opinion to daniel morads you would not of called it "low hanging fruit" would you?. see what i mean?Tribalism. You posted one persons opinion that was negative because it fit a narrative. Let me find 12 GT3 drivers yootoob videos where they all love ACC then. Right?
thanks man, I appreciate thatThat was a mini game released some ages ago. Can get it here: http://classicmotorsporthub.org:200/BMW M3 CHALLENGE/
I've sent your report to the original author he may have a look into it.