Seeing as how I don't follow tennis, I don't know what incident you're talking about. But characterising refugees as hooligans is fairly racist.I stayed up late to watch The Australian Open which was side showed by some refugee hooligans.
Whenever something sounds slightly offensive, better characterize it as racist, just in case. Good plan.Seeing as how I don't follow tennis, I don't know what incident you're talking about. But characterising refugees as hooligans is fairly racist.
I don't really know if that makes sense. He said "refugee hooligans", which I read as "refugees who are hooligans", not "all refugees are hooligans".Seeing as how I don't follow tennis, I don't know what incident you're talking about. But characterising refugees as hooligans is fairly racist.
My main issue with your description is that they were neither refugees or hooligans.I stayed up late to watch The Australian Open which was side showed by some refugee hooligans. WTF was that about? lol
Must show some sort of troubles going on there.
I'm not racist by any means, I will welcome all into my country providing you follow our rules, that's just being respectful to those who founded the country, and respectful to those who live in it, we do the same when we go overseas,
but then I hold some contradictions in terms close to my heart regarding the subject of Refugee's and others of the sort,
Such as "Illegal Immigrant" you can't be both, If your an immigrant, if you're not, get out!
This will probably raise some questions about me being or not being "politically correct"
Well in my experience, if its political, there's a fair chance its not correct,
My opinion is that if you want to live in my country, then follow the procedures and do it correctly, don't come to my house and demand change, you want to live in our yard, your beliefs will be respected within the confines of your yard, but don't expect it to be the entirety of the border,
I hate how those Fosters chugging, vegemite eating, shrimp barbecueing racists just generalize about entire cultures from dumb stereotypes. Maybe if they stopped surfing or wrestling kangaroos for a minute they could go educate themselves.Australians all make sweeping generalisations, and everyone else finds that disgusting.
I hate how those Fosters chugging, vegemite eating, shrimp barbecueing racists just generalize about entire cultures from dumb stereotypes. Maybe if they stopped surfing or wrestling kangaroos for a minute they could go educate themselves.
Follow the rules, OK fine with that.I'm not racist by any means, I will welcome all into my country providing you follow our rules, that's just being respectful to those who founded the country, and respectful to those who live in it, we do the same when we go overseas,
Refugee and Immigrant are two totally different things, given that I'm not sure why you are conflating them.but then I hold some contradictions in terms close to my heart regarding the subject of Refugee's and others of the sort,
Such as "Illegal Immigrant" you can't be both, If your an immigrant, if you're not, get out!
It raises some questions, but not about political correctness (but to be fair based on experience those who start with "I'm not a racist, but......" and go into a variation of "political correctness gone mad" normally do).This will probably raise some questions about me being or not being "politically correct"
Ahh. So you advocate a non-political approach then, so Anarchy it is then, but that does raise the question of you wanting people to follow rules.Well in my experience, if its political, there's a fair chance its not correct,
OK. Not quite sure what you are getting at here, as the analogy is rather confusing. People should be free to express the culture and beliefs they have as long as it doesn't interfere with the rights of other people (and when it does you will normally find that those damn politicians have put rules in place to deal with it already).My opinion is that if you want to live in my country, then follow the procedures and do it correctly, don't come to my house and demand change, you want to live in our yard, your beliefs will be respected within the confines of your yard, but don't expect it to be the entirety of the border,
Respect those who founded the country? Which ones? The original Polynesians, the Maori or the Europeans who arrived much later?
Refugee and Immigrant are two totally different things, given that I'm not sure why you are conflating them
Ahh. So you advocate a non-political approach then, so Anarchy it is then, but that does raise the question of you wanting people to follow rules.
OK. Not quite sure what you are getting at here, as the analogy is rather confusing. People should be free to express the culture and beliefs they have as long as it doesn't interfere with the rights of other people (and when it does you will normally find that those damn politicians have put rules in place to deal with it already).
So the immigration that has followed the original settlement of NZ by the Polynesians has been totally and utterly respected as it? That is the single true culture of the country? I call shenanigans on that.The Indigenous obviously,
An illegal immigrant and a refugee are totally different things (the UN has some nice legal descriptions - you should take a look at them before making stuff up to suit your own agenda).How so? A legal immigrant has taken the official path to becoming a citizen, an illegal immigrant comes here then claims refugee status, they shouldn't expect to just be set free upon crossing the shore line,
Refugees aren't collected from their country and sent over, they come here in what resembles a boat, then freeload,
Still not the same things and you were the one stating that most political choices were not correct, that would indicate your belief that politics don't work. So what would you suggest as an alternate to politics?Not my choice in words, but anarchy is what we can expect if we continue to short cut refugees into immigrant status with going the official path,
So you punish the whole based on the actions of the few. And that will solve the issues with extremism how?I'm not saying anyone is a bad person or up to no good, but eventually if things continue someone with ties to an extremist group is bound to get in,
So I take it you call for that from all cultures. What would this 'zero' culture dress code look like? How about language and social integration?Everyone is entitled to have their beliefs, religions, way of life etc yes I agree, but keep it to the confines of your own home, I do, think of beliefs like a mans appendage, every man has an appendage, that's fine, but get it out in public or stick it in my face then we have a problem,
No this thread is not racist (I'm still struggling with the concept of a virtual, non-sentient concept being racist), nor is the topic of the thread racist.Wait so is this thread to pay out us Australians? And you guys think your not racesist? Come on guys seriously. It's funny how you guys think. This thread is racist or what people come across Australians. Half of yo have probably never been here who are making remarks.
Still not the same things and you were the one stating that most political choices were not correct, that would indicate your belief that politics don't work. So what would you suggest as an alternate to politics?
Wait so is this thread to pay out us Australians? And you guys think your not racesist? Come on guys seriously. It's funny how you guys think. This thread is racist or what people come across Australians. Half of yo have probably never been here who are making remarks.
This thread was started by someone who has Australia down as their location and is very likely to be Australian. It hasn't been set up to have a go.
As others have repeated it's certainly likely that every country has their problems with racism and xenophobia. You could take a sample of 50 Britons and 50 Australians and find 100 whackjobs or 0 whackjobs. It is never as simple as "[X people] have this problem..." and as with many anglosphere and/or western country, Australia has the same problem with "in the interest of national security" as its counterparts. One can even draw parallels to treatment of pre-colonial peoples in Australia as the United States.
When did I say it was?Congratulations, you know a lot about New Zealand, and I'm pleased for you, New Zealand is not Australia.......
Indeed.And yes I agree with that point, my partner is of Indigenous decent and her family are what the majority of the population call, "land grabbers" when that isn't the case, all they ask is that certain areas aren't developed, and other areas, such as park lands, Forrest regions etc be renamed to celebrate that of their ancestors, or not have a burial ground dug up, id be really annoyed if someone pulled up my family to build a Woolworths, so I respect that and admire their fight for that to be in place,
But you don't. You don't want them to even have a culture outside of the home.I would also support that in other cultures as well,
That's not even a tiny fraction of politics, let alone most of it.Shortcutting immigration, not correct, payroll tax, not correct, carbon tax, not correct, giving cyclists 1 meter or more of a road and not making them liable for damages if they happen to harm a pedestrian, not correct, so in short most of politics isnt correct,
This thread was started by someone who has Australia down as their location and is very likely to be Australian. It hasn't been set up to have a go.
As others have repeated it's certainly likely that every country has their problems with racism and xenophobia. You could take a sample of 50 Britons and 50 Australians and find 100 whackjobs or 0 whackjobs. It is never as simple as "[X people] have this problem..." and as with many anglosphere and/or western country, Australia has the same problem with "in the interest of national security" as its counterparts. One can even draw parallels to treatment of pre-colonial peoples in Australia as the United States.
But you don't. You don't want them to even have a culture outside of the home.
That's not even a tiny fraction of politics, let alone most of it.
How exactly have I taken it out of context. You said.....You clearly take way to much out of context, what I mean is that, you have your way, I have mine, I'm not going to tell you live my way, don't expect me to live by yours,
Then why make the claim that "if its political, there's a fair chance its not correct,"?No its not is it? But do either of us have the time to discuss politics in depth? I don't,
No, I base my experiences of Australians on Australians.My point was people seem to come across us as something they only see in movies or on tv.
Now given what you have said its either the first or the third, as the second one is the total opposite of what you said