Automotive Guilty Pleasures

  • Thread starter Turtle
  • 1,415 comments
  • 131,674 views
49392005_Saleen_Focus_S121_N20_-2.jpg
 
90s Rovers really have a lot of charm and they're not really that bad, I've been wanting a 400/600 series one for a while. They hold their value worse than chinese kitchen appliances and they rust like nothing else but otherwise they're all-round more appealing than equivalent Honda counterparts. I'm yet to find a car interior more comfy than the beige faux wood glory of the 416. Forget about Land Cruisers and the S-Class.
 
Rover does have a bad reputation, justified in many cases, but I've always felt they made good looking cars. Especially the later ones: SD1, 200 Coupe, 600, 800 and the 75.

I in fact do have a Hondrover, the Honda Civic which was joint engineered into the Rover 400. Definitely a safer option if you don't have much money.
 
The headgaskets in the K-engines are probably what they're know the best for. That and the rust.

Our 416 hatch had both of those problems and eventually ended up at the scrapyard. What a waste of perfectly good sexy C pillars.

upload_2015-2-5_14-44-31.jpeg
 
The headgaskets in the K-engines are probably what they're know the best for. That and the rust.

Our 416 hatch had both of those problems and eventually ended up at the scrapyard. What a waste of perfectly good sexy C pillars.

View attachment 305161

Always thought the 400 was the only late-90s Rover to lose any appeal in x5 trim. Quad headlights on a Hondrover just seemed to add 10 years to the looks.

The 200 on the other hand looked more contemporary (and classy) as a 25. Although both of those 'bubble-shaped' Rovers were more appealing than the MG ZR and the 2004 face-lift.

In fact, the Streetwise might actually be my favourite iteration:

8981081.jpg
 
Last edited:
Always thought the 400 was the only late-90s Rover to lose any appeal in 45 trim. Quad headlights on a Hondrover just seemed to add 10 years to the looks. The 200 on the other hand looked more contemporary (and classy) as a 25. Both were more appealing than the MG ZR and the 2004 face-lift.
I agree, the quad headlights could have been a step forward but the excessive chrome (blergh door handles blergh) that they added and all-gray interiors just made the 45 a Casa Blanca edition of the Civic. The 25 pulled it off much better. Streetwise, anyone?
 
Always thought the 400 was the only late-90s Rover to lose any appeal in x5 trim. Quad headlights on a Hondrover just seemed to add 10 years to the looks.

The 200 on the other hand looked more contemporary (and classy) as a 25. Although both of those 'bubble-shaped' Rovers were more appealing than the MG ZR and the 2004 face-lift.

In fact, the Streetwise might actually be my favourite iteration:

8981081.jpg

Now that is a guilty pleasure, there a few cars I dislike more than the Streetwise :lol:

I've had experience with a regular 25. A couple of years ago an old lady I sold a car to had one as a trade-in. She'd owned it from new, and it had the BMW-derived 2.0-litre diesel. I drove from Edinburgh to Chester to collect it, then took the Rover back (via Harrogate, so the return leg was about 300 miles.)

I'm pretty sure that she'd never revved it past 1500rpm, because it was gutless. Like, couldn't-hold-70-up-a-gentle-motorway-incline gutless. The look from a guy in a 3 Series I overtook when I was flat out down a steep hill was priceless :D

Despite the terrible lack of power, the lights with the power of a birthday candle, the faulty alarm, the numerous buttons inside the cabin that didn't work, and soggy brakes which pulled alarmingly to one side, it was still infinitely more likeable than the first-gen Vauxhall Meriva I sold her.
 
77SunbirdFormulaSportCoupe.jpg

79610.jpg


Shame you won't find many of these or it's fastback version that looks like a mini Firebird very often anymore, even in bad shape.
 
God how I love the 400. Has to be my favourite Ferrari (run close by a 246 Dino), but I know she'd be a terrible mistress. The good times would be amazing - exciting, exhilarating and down right sexy - but when you needed to rely on her the most, you know she'd let you down. She's the on you'd love the most but ultimately have to let go.

1979-ferrari-400-automatic-27920_09c149f11eac2089_858X617.jpg


Less than £20k too!
 
It's an unusual looking car. I thought the 400 was the designation for the 4-door car they made?
 
It's an unusual looking car. I thought the 400 was the designation for the 4-door car they made?
Not sure. I've only ever seen 2 door 2+2 versions, be it the 400, 400i or 412.
 
V6 twin turbo in a car smaller than a 3 series. That's awesome, even if the cars themselves aren't even worth the scrap they're made from.
 
I would post a Ghibli II here now except that's not so guilty as they're awesome. 320bhp from a turbocharged 2 litre V6 - magic!
 
Shame you won't find many of these or it's fastback version that looks like a mini Firebird very often anymore, even in bad shape.

YES. I'd rock one of these every singe day of my life. Or until it imploded.
 
Back