- 29,375
- Glasgow
- GTP_Mars
I wonder what is wrong with proposing a 'Leave' referendum, to take the decision of 'Deal or No Deal' (and, read 'Backstop or No Backstop') away from the warring MPs and give it back to the people in an unequivocal, simple two-option question: Do you want to leave the EU with the Withdrawal Agreement* or Do you want to leave the EU without a deal.
To me, that would seem fair. It would a) respect the first result and b) give the Government a mandate to proceed. It would either force MPs (mainly Labour) to agree to the Withdrawal Agreement, or it would force MPs to vote through a No Deal Brexit.
* The EU have insisted that the Withdrawal Agreement is required for all possible deals, so there is no point in arguing for a third option e.g. a 'new' deal/new Withdrawal Agreement.
To me, that would seem fair. It would a) respect the first result and b) give the Government a mandate to proceed. It would either force MPs (mainly Labour) to agree to the Withdrawal Agreement, or it would force MPs to vote through a No Deal Brexit.
* The EU have insisted that the Withdrawal Agreement is required for all possible deals, so there is no point in arguing for a third option e.g. a 'new' deal/new Withdrawal Agreement.
One MP who didn't vote for the motion last night has voted for the Bill today - given that only Tory and DUP MPs didn't vote for the motion last night, that means that whoever changed their vote today is either a Tory or a DUP MP - and I'm guessing it wasn't the DUP. That means another expulsion.The House has backed the first stage of the Brexit delay bill by 329 to 300. There is talk of more expulsions from the Conservative party.