Option 100. Re-instate the results from the running order before the 1st SC period.
I've seen little news all week. Where's the evidence? Who leveled the accusation? Piquet Sr or Jr? There is no story, yet.
The FIA had better have more evidence than Massa's suspicions to go on. Although I reckon it is possible that Renault did this on purpose, I would be shocked if it were actually so...
I had expected Renault to have thought twice about firing Nelson Jr mid-season, for a variety of interesting reasons which would have been likely to attract the attention of m'learned friends if I had been rash enough to reveal them here. Let's just say that the Piquet/Renault story is almost certainly unfinished, with some potentially fascinating and possibly even scandalous turns in the road still to come.
Piquet JrThe conditions I have had to deal with during the last two years have been very strange to say the least - there are incidents that I can hardly believe occurred myself
If that happened I imagine Massa wouldn't accept it.
And destroy any credibility that F1 has left??Really hoping Massa comes out of this as World Champion
Welcome to last year.I also want Timo Glock investigated for his super slow last lap in Brazil 2008 that gave Hamilton the title.
Really hoping Massa comes out of this as World Champion
I also want Timo Glock investigated for his super slow last lap in Brazil 2008 that gave Hamilton the title.
It won't happen, but if it did...
That was a result of poor tyres. Glock was on intermediates that were rapidly fading as the track dried out, but there was a chance of getting some points. The problem was that if Toyota brought him in that late in the game, he'd never be able to make up the difference. So they kept him out in the hopes that they'd last long enough to get him to the finish line. The tyres didn't hold, and Glock was forced to do the last lap at a pedestrian pace.I also want Timo Glock investigated for his super slow last lap in Brazil 2008 that gave Hamilton the title.
If they're foun guilty, I think the best move would be a penalty that applies this year. They can't rightly go changing the standings of last year's championship and I think Rosberg would reject a win that was by default after a year - especially since it wouold be his maiden victory and no-one wants to win it like that - and Felipe Massa would do the same for the championship. Since it's been a year, it's probably going to be a harsh penalty; at the very least, they'd be excluded from Singapore, and I wouln't be too surprised if they were banned from racing for the rest of the year, stripped of points for this season or just excluded outright.Renault summoned by FIA's WMSC
By Jonathan Noble - Friday, September 4th 2009, 15:52 GMT
Renault has been summoned to appear before an extraordinary hearing of the FIA's World Motor Sport Council later this month to answer charges that it caused a deliberate crash in last year's Singapore GP.
The team's representatives have been asked to appear at the hearing, which takes place in Paris on September 21, to respond to claims that Nelson Piquet's crash in the night race was intentional - with the aim of helping team-mate Fernando Alonso win.
After it was revealed last weekend that the FIA was investigating the events that took place in Singapore, following the emergence of fresh evidence, the FIA confirmed on Friday that it believed there was a case to be answered.
In a statement the FIA said: "Representatives of ING Renault F1 have been requested to appear before an extraordinary meeting of the FIA World Motor Sport Council in Paris on Monday, 21 September 2009.
"The team representatives have been called to answer charges, including a breach of Article 151c of the International Sporting Code, that the team conspired with its driver, Nelson Piquet Jr, to cause a deliberate crash at the 2008 Singapore Grand Prix with the aim of causing the deployment of the safety car to the advantage of its other driver, Fernando Alonso."
Article 151c is the standard disrepute charge, which can result in any severity of punishment, ranging from reprimands and fines through to race bans and exclusion from the world championship.
It states an offence is: "Any fraudulent conduct or any act prejudicial to the interests of any competition or to the interests of motor sport generally."
Piquet's crash early in the race caused a safety car, and the timing of that was perfect for helping Alonso move to the head of the field despite a very early first stop for fuel.
At the time of the event, Piquet was adamant that the crash had been caused simply by him pushing too hard.
"It was my mistake," said the Brazilian. "We tried two extreme strategies with Fernando quite short and me quite long in the hope of getting a safety car. If I hadn't crashed I would have been lucky with the safety car later in the race because I was very happy.
"We're always scraping the walls, and once you've touched the wall a little too much and lose control that's it."
However, it was fresh evidence that came to light in the last few weeks that forced the FIA to take action - and which has resulted in the WMSC hearing. That evidence has also emerged shortly after Piquet was dropped by Renault, although it is not known if the Brazilian himself was a catalyst for the investigation.
Renault issued a statement on Friday night stating that it would not be making any comment about the situation prior to the FIA court hearing.
"The ING Renault F1 Team acknowledges the FIA's request for representatives of the team to appear before the FIA World Motor Sport Council in Paris on the 21st of September 2009," it said. "Before attending the hearing, the team will not make any further comment."
If they're cheating to win, good riddance. It's gonna be a great birthday for me if they're found guilty. I never really have liked Renault for some reason.
I don't deny that, however, at least another new team (Read: Prodrive) might get a chance in F1.It's not really about if anyone likes them or not, It WILL be bad for the sport if they do pull out, That can't be denied.
I agree something along those lines will probably happen.I don't think Renault would pull the plug straight away. Rather, I think they'd reshuffle the top order - condemn Briatore to obscuirty while they're at it - and come back in 2010 with a view to make up for their embarrassment.
+...infinity. You described perfectly why I don't like Renault (And never have).LancerEvo, I'm kind of with you in hat I never liked them much. They always seemed more interested in running one car - Alonso's - as opposed to actually making a proper effort with two cars. And Briatore has screwed so many people over during his tenure as team principal that he's hardly the most endearing person. He's like a drunken uncle that you only invite to your wedding because he's related.
Wait...somebody has to tell Piquet to crash? Has that radio transmission been on repeat ever since?
Wait, has it been confirmed that Piquet is the source of the accusations?Regardless of the accusation it is obvious Piquet has an agenda and is desperate to get retribution on Briatore.