Britain - The Official Thread
- Thread starter Ross
- 13,316 comments
- 607,528 views
- 87,105
- Rule 12
- GTP_Famine
Wouldn't need to unless my notion that the minimum requirement is 50% of the electorate is implemented too. And even then it'd only be the first few times as it sinks in.
AV basically allows you to select the candidates in preference orders. At the first count of the votes if nobody has more than 50% of the votes cast, the last-placed candidate is eliminated and those who voted for them as their first choice have their second-choice votes counted in a recount. That continues until there's one candidate who scores more than 50% of the votes cast, with the last-placed candidate eliminated each round and any votes for them move down to the next preference.
I personally think that it should be 50% of the votes possible, because if someone's getting elected as a representative of the area they should be having more votes for them than not for them. But baby steps and all - our outgoing government had 29.3% of votes possible, and the new one looks to be barely breaking 20%.
- 29,260
- Glasgow
- GTP_Mars
One commentator this morning said that Labour's victory in this election was "A mile wide and an inch deep"...
- 2,941
- United Kingdom
Conservatives
Was disappointed with Streeting's "plan" for health and social care when questioned by Rory Stewart on C4's election coverage.One commentator this morning said that Labour's victory in this election was "A mile wide and an inch deep"...
Barra333
Premium
- 6,533
- London, ON
- barra333
Here's how it is being presented where I was reading..One commentator this morning said that Labour's victory in this election was "A mile wide and an inch deep"...
- 12,892
- Cambridge
- Moglet85
- Moglet
I had an interaction with someone on Facebook this morning that I feel sums up a lot of Tory voters. When they were discussing Labour increasing tax I mentioned that I'd happily pay more tax if it meant we had a decent working infrastructure and that those less well off could have a better quality of life. The Tory voter replied with "I want to pay more tax - Said absolutely nobody to their accountant in the real world".
They literally can't comprehend that not everyone sees gaining more money as their primary goal.
They literally can't comprehend that not everyone sees gaining more money as their primary goal.
Last edited:
- 23,972
- It/It
- GTP_TheCracker
- 17,153
- United Kingdom
Normally the number of people on my social feeds banging on about electoral reform is one, me.
Worringly, a number of acquaintances have all cottoned on this morning... I wonder who they voted for.
Time for a friend list purge!
Worringly, a number of acquaintances have all cottoned on this morning... I wonder who they voted for.
Time for a friend list purge!
- 17,153
- United Kingdom
With 648 declarations,
Keef
Premium
- 25,084
- Dayton, OH
- GTP_KeefRacer
- GTP Keef
Sounds like good news in the UK, a totally lopsided result. Somehow I doubt we'll be able to pull off the same thing. Good luck y'all, hopefully Labour is sensible on the global stage especially. Apparently your new PM was anti-Brexit. Are there any implications for that issue in this election?
- 23,972
- It/It
- GTP_TheCracker
I think the official party line is that, as far as Brexit is concerned, what's done is done and they'll just have to live with it. LibDems were the only real party with talk of turning around on Brexit. Labour were split on it back in 2016 and paid the price for their indecision in the 2017 GE. They're best to leave the subject well alone for now.
- 29,824
- Bratvegas
- GTP_Liquid
Brexit is a case of not being able to put the toothpaste back in the tube as far as mainstream politics is concerned.
You can, and people absolutely will, remind everyone how damaging it was, is and will continue to be but what's done is done. Everyone has to deal with the consequences and forgiveness or forgetfulness will be expressed in different magnitudes.
You can, and people absolutely will, remind everyone how damaging it was, is and will continue to be but what's done is done. Everyone has to deal with the consequences and forgiveness or forgetfulness will be expressed in different magnitudes.
- 4,761
- United Kingdom
- Fezzik-GT
- Fezzik1983
Noteworthy - Rachel Reeves has just been appointed as the UK's first female chancellor.
Also things could be a bit frosty in Washington for the new Foreign Secretary depending on how things go in November - "Trump is not only a woman-hating, neo-Nazi-sympathising sociopath. He is also a profound threat to the international order that has been the foundation of Western progress for so long"
Also things could be a bit frosty in Washington for the new Foreign Secretary depending on how things go in November - "Trump is not only a woman-hating, neo-Nazi-sympathising sociopath. He is also a profound threat to the international order that has been the foundation of Western progress for so long"
Last edited:
- 23,972
- It/It
- GTP_TheCracker
Keef
Premium
- 25,084
- Dayton, OH
- GTP_KeefRacer
- GTP Keef
Is Trump is elected again we can fully expect all of our best foreign friendships to get "frosty" at best. I would say that the UK's election results illustrate how out of touch American conservatives are but the far-right wave seems to vary widely. France is the next bone-headed country going through it. I was hoping cooler heads would prevail across the world in most of these elections but so far the UK seems to be the most reasonable of the bunch.
Last edited:
Keef
Premium
- 25,084
- Dayton, OH
- GTP_KeefRacer
- GTP Keef
True, but a part of me would rather be swept up in a global political wave than stand out as the town idiot. In the current global climate, all our allied relationships are more important than ever so as long as we're all on the same page we'd be in good shape.
What are the international implications of Labour and liberals having so many votes? Do they have the politics necessary to take a stronger role in NATO?
Edit: Apparently these conservatives in France take an anti-NATO stance as well so it's obviously a very bad time for them to put their heads up their asses.
Last edited:
- 17,153
- United Kingdom
I don't know about that. The seemingly sensible Labour party won, not because of a ground swell of support for a left orientated fairly centrist party, but because of a ground swell of support from across the political spectrum splitting the right wing vote. Yes, on the surface we appear to have made a reasonable choice, but a decent chunk of the electorate has lurched further right
- 23,972
- It/It
- GTP_TheCracker
With all our traditional allies turning futher right when we've just swung left-leaning centre, it's us that's set to stand out.
- 29,991
- Cuddington, Cheshire
- JDA1982
I have an issue with this logic, for two reasons. Firstly, because, we already pay enough taxes to have decent infrastructure and quality of life. I would not be in favour of increasing personal income taxes at all, as things stand. The issues with infrastructure and spending on services etc. Isn't that the money isn't there, rather, it's being badly spent and in many cases, wasted.
For example, in Altrincham there's a 1 lane wide bridge over a canal with traffic lights on each side to say which direction can go over at any time. This bridge had a habit of getting damaged every once in a while, as it is quite a narrow, and old bridge. So the local authority did some research and paid for people to have a think and plan possible options, and the ended up putting concrete bolloards in to narrow the entry to the bridge on each side so larger vehicles couldn't cross. Fine, solves a recurring problem, yet it cost nearly £100k. The actual cost of the bollards being put in is a fraction of that.
And that's nothing compared to the wastage that goes on. Look at HS2.
Also near Altrincham, they built a new bypass, it's great, I drive along it several times to work and it has got traffic moving along better than before. But to build it, they had to buy several properties either along it's route, or where they were setting up sites. One such property was a listed manor with tennis courts and a fair amount of land. It cost them £1.5m to buy. After finishing the bypass, that manor was sold for less than £300k, as it had been left and was now in a state of disrepair.
There are stupid, and avoidable losses like these that go on all the time. These examples don't touch the sides. More tax means more wastage, not necessarily better infrastructure or services. What we need is a complete overhaul of how money is spent by government and local authorities, and for there to be far more accountability for the wastage that goes on.
In principal, if it were as simple as more tax equals a better NHS, services and infrastructure, then, to a reasonable point I would understand and agree with the sentiment. But we don't need more taxes, we need better decision making.
That said, many people are selfish, they want the most for themselves only, so even in that scenario, more taxes may not be that popular.
Last edited:
Keef
Premium
- 25,084
- Dayton, OH
- GTP_KeefRacer
- GTP Keef
Gotta be honest, if anybody needs it it's probably Canada. A beacon of stability and safety, Canada has gotten to the point where it's basically ignoring international realities especially future realities. The whole "northwest passage" issue for example...Canada has the opportunity to have extreme influence on global shipping within the next 50 years but thusfar hasn't done anything to prepare for it. It's going to be like a Bab al-Mandeb/Hormuz/Malacca level of oceanic influence so they need a mindset of taking a harder stance on naval defense in particular.
Last edited:
