YehArmed with that information, is 3 years and 4 months appropriate when you have no jail time for this guy:
You’re really so far down a **** covered rabbit hole you know long can see which way is up.
- Made £15k selling illegally modified streaming devices (Amazon Firesticks) to over 500 people.
- Had previous convictions for fraud.
- Was on license at the time of the offense (probation is a term people outside the UK may know better).
- After serving three years for dealing cocaine.
So, what we have presently is a massive prison crisis where some prisons are down to hardly any space left for new inmates. People who are involved with the system are looking at the Netherlands and Texas (as examples) for ideas on how to fix it, with things like better technology being mooted as well as reduced sentencing for some offences (both those examples have seen a reduction in prisoners per capita; Texas has also seen a reduction in the crime rate).Yeh
I assume you’re discounting…
You’re really so far down a **** covered rabbit hole you know long can see which way is up.
So far, I've been using BBC Radio 4, LBC, The Times, Twitter, Reddit, New Statesman, Prospect, Vox, Unherd, Mirror, Daily Mail, Guardian, Independent among others to keep abreast of current UK/international affairs. What do you recommend adding?I’m actually starting to pitty you and getting concerned for your mental well-being. You seem to live in a world dominated by negative media which is spun on purpose to draw people with nothing but anger or hate deep within and try and draw it to the surface.
The problem is....we're still discussing "me" and not producing productive discussion. It's very narrowly focussed and if we don't move on, what's the point of posting?Then as others have pointed out you lay this as a foundation to a good talking point to get your thoughts across. Then when you’re asked to act in better faith and provide other sources of information or take into account other details which debunk or at least show other reasoning you just blindly lead on.
I take back my statement of “tantamount to trolling” and I put fourth you are trolling.
Definitely passionate about improving the country/preventing a Trumpian response from the electorate. Not sure about "clever".Sad really as you seemed like quite an impassioned and clever person.
So close to getting it...The problem is....we're still discussing "me" and not producing productive discussion.
You guys have completely neglected to post his defence:It's not a crime if you're ripping off rich dudes, right? The guy's virtually Robin Hood with a coke straw. Let's concentrate on asylum seekers receiving private healthcare instead. They obviously don't deserve it and Trafford council must be lying if they say it isn't happening.
At least the red meat portion of my diet is fully covered for today. We should all be more outraged.
/s
Julian Nutter, defending, said: "The background is he had lost his employment in a restaurant as a result of the Covid emergency, and he had been doing this on an ad hoc basis, but nothing like what it became, and after he lost his job he used this to maintain his family. There are two children, aged nine and 12.
"He was taking far too much cannabis and he was not his normal self. He was a bottom feeder and not some exotic big fish. He was operating from his own home, and this was not a sophisticated business scheme. There was none of the trappings of a proper business enterprise."
He added: "Whether of not he made a significant profit is an issue which is raised. The point should be made on his behalf that the people who would buy his products would not be people who are likely to have the money to buy a Sky subscription. They have limited income. The people he would be been dealing with in the Merseyside area would hardly be the same as toffs in London who would have money coming in from the city. He was providing a service to people who would probably not be able to afford it otherwise. There's an element of a Robin Hood to all that."
He said Edge was "a rather wretched individual who has got out of his depth".
Does that mean they're right?Who do you think Joe Public is gonna listen to? Who do you think they'll relate to?
Interpreting what has been said of your chicanery as that is insane, given that the whole problem with your discussion "technique" is to misrepresent what's been said to you and throw the victim card.But saying I need to conform to your worldview is rather silly and counter-productive.
Not the issue, once again the point has flown over you at SR-71 levelsOK, I get it, I'm abrasive at times.
The comments section at the Mail, that's your appeal?The comments? Over a thousand on the DM:
Literally no one has said that at all.But saying I need to conform to your worldview is rather silly and counter-productive.