Car drawings

  • Thread starter Pebb
  • 3,548 comments
  • 471,083 views
DeviantART maybe? I'm not about to go and say it's not your work as I don't care enough to search for evidence supporting that and I could have easily mistaken it with someone else's drawing. That one photo used as reference is after all a popular photo for people looking to drawing the 8C.

But I really could've sworn I've seen this exact drawing years ago... same line weight, tone, everything. :P

That aside, it does look great. The attention to value is superb.

@homeforsummer can verify that it's mine, or make me out to be a berk, and tell you he's never seen it before..

Also, my signature is in the bottom corner. If you were really bothered it'd be quite easy to prove that it's mine.
 
@Nessy hyperdrool over that red thing that looks like an old Alfa Romeo race car... or something. And as usual I love your wheels, the ones in the Fiat are amazing!
Thanks man. 👍 The red thing is/or will be another Fiat, it's my take on the Fiat Abarth 2000 Scorpio, though i agree, there's definitely some Alfa Romeo going on in there.
 
Thanks man. 👍 The red thing is/or will be another Fiat, it's my take on the Fiat Abarth 2000 Scorpio, though i agree, there's definitely some Alfa Romeo going on in there.


Ah, yes, the Scorpio! I was trying to point down what car you were exactly trying to modernize but for the life of me couldn't quite nail it, so I blabbered Alfa. your modwernization looks stunning now that I have the image of the exact car in my head. FINISH IT!! I've always liked that cokroach.
 
1925174_10152665922744097_1397926539_n.jpg


Pretty satisfied with the wheel I must say.
 
Ah, yes, the Scorpio! I was trying to point down what car you were exactly trying to modernize but for the life of me couldn't quite nail it, so I blabbered Alfa. your modwernization looks stunning now that I have the image of the exact car in my head. FINISH IT!! I've always liked that cokroach.
Thanks :lol: I will definitely finish the Cokaroach, though it appears 'IED' have already done an 'Abarth ScorpION' concept car quite recently. I usually check to see whether there are existing modwernizations of the cars already, but checked too late on this occasion.. and low and behold, what i had in mind is fairly similar to what has been done already. :indiff:
Still i will complete it all the same. :)

[EDIT]

Also just realised my concept is starting to look like the Ferrari Xezri concept, and Ferrari Sergio concept. :indiff:
 
Last edited:
Pics of all those, specially of that IED dude o whatever.
Here's the Ferrari Xezri:

9a58db36fb98887506a364e00de9ebc2.jpg


Here's the Ferrari Sergio:

Pinifarina-Ferrari-Sergio-15-600x340.jpg


And finally, the IED Abarth ScorpION: (Looks like this pic is courtesy of GTP's very own @homeforsummer, :) nice pics though iv'e yet to read the artical)

ied-abarth-scorpion-concept_100342811_l.jpg


This is what iv'e done so far (rushed and by no means finished):



[EDIT]

Damn you IED.. stop coming up with all these concepts that look like i copied them. :lol:

(IED) Hyundai PassoCorto:

hyundai-passo-corte-01-630x333.jpg

hyundai-passo-corte-02-630x344.jpg


(i really should read 'paultan.org' more often)
 
Last edited:
1


Lamborghini Cazador LP-600-4 GT3 Stradale.

A little rusty at this stuff (not done drawing in a while) and its just a rough basis for a 'Shop image

So... Just in case it doesn't work
 
Last edited:
@Nessy, I am awful at drawing again! But here's what I wanted to point out about your last render:

1655745_10152678101119097_117136263_o.jpg


12719091474_2232510ed9_b.jpg


I scribbled in the two notes where I've come to realize (while I was drawing) what you had in your render the forms weren't making complete sense to me.

The first was you flattening perspective. If we wanted to correct it, there are two choices you can make:

1; You either show more of the side and foreshorten the front nose, or 2: you keep the angle of the view on the front and foreshorten the side. I noticed you couldn't quite decide on either which is why I initially felt the whole drawing felt rather flat. If we aim for the former, we should see less of the left lamp, almost none even. If we aim for the latter, we probably wouldn't see so much of the door due to the wide fender flare covering it.

Secondly, I was having a hard time grasping the form from the door to the rear arch. I was trying to visualize how that side panel should look if the rear arch was as deep as it was. I noted that the edge where the side panel and the fender arch met was connected in such a way that the top portion of the fender was greatly larger than it was towards the bottom of the car. I understand that's natural with most wide bodies, but here's the thing. When that happens, the lower half of the side panel protrudes out more than the upper half (closer to the window sill). It kept looking strange to me because that kind of form wasn't really showing up on the side panel. I saw the skirt is actually flush with the fenders' edge, and that - towards my understanding of form - meant your relatively flat side panel travels down and then curves outward towards that edge. Is that how it's supposed to look? Or was the entire side panel supposed to be relatively flat, but on a large slant? I can picture it being that, and that would make perfect sense according to your render, but I couldn't imagine that being what you intended, because it doesn't hold the rounded shape of a Fiat.
 
Last edited:
Here's the Ferrari Xezri:

Here's the Ferrari Sergio:

And finally, the IED Abarth ScorpION: (Looks like this pic is courtesy of GTP's very own @homeforsummer, :) nice pics though iv'e yet to read the artical)

This is what iv'e done so far (rushed and by no means finished):


Ah, those Ferraris don't count, they're the typical random designer Photoshop weekend special with a real car badge on them. Stupid.

And I really like this red thing.
 
@Nessy, I am awful at drawing again! But here's what I wanted to point out about your last render:

1655745_10152678101119097_117136263_o.jpg


12719091474_2232510ed9_b.jpg


I scribbled in the two notes where I've come to realize (while I was drawing) what you had in your render the forms weren't making complete sense to me.

The first was you flattening perspective. If we wanted to correct it, there are two choices you can make:

1; You either show more of the side and foreshorten the front nose, or 2: you keep the angle of the view on the front and foreshorten the side. I noticed you couldn't quite decide on either which is why I initially felt the whole drawing felt rather flat. If we aim for the former, we should see less of the left lamp, almost none even. If we aim for the latter, we probably wouldn't see so much of the door due to the wide fender flare covering it.

Secondly, I was having a hard time grasping the form from the door to the rear arch. I was trying to visualize how that side panel should look if the rear arch was as deep as it was. I noted that the edge where the side panel and the fender arch met was connected in such a way that the top portion of the fender was greatly larger than it was towards the bottom of the car. I understand that's natural with most wide bodies, but here's the thing. When that happens, the lower half of the side panel protrudes out more than the upper half (closer to the window sill). It kept looking strange to me because that kind of form wasn't really showing up on the side panel. I saw the skirt is actually flush with the fenders' edge, and that - towards my understanding of form - meant your relatively flat side panel travels down and then curves outward towards that edge. Is that how it's supposed to look? Or was the entire side panel supposed to be relatively flat, but on a large slant? I can picture it being that, and that would make perfect sense according to your render, but I couldn't imagine that being what you intended, because it doesn't hold the rounded shape of a Fiat.
Thanks @AOS. Your sketch does do a better job of explaining the form i was hoping to achieve, infact, i can't look at both pictures without realising just how flat my drawing is. 👍 Also, i agree, there is a lot of mystery surrounding the side panel & arch relationships. I think it's better to just assume it's a flat surface, as i'm struggling to make sense of it myself. :lol:

Thanks again, it's definitely given me food for thought.

PS. @legacyMACHINE. For some reason, can't see your drawing.
 
Back