@
Nessy, I am awful at drawing again! But here's what I wanted to point out about your last render:
I scribbled in the two notes where I've come to realize (while I was drawing) what you had in your render the forms weren't making complete sense to me.
The first was you flattening perspective. If we wanted to correct it, there are two choices you can make:
1; You either show more of the side and foreshorten the front nose, or 2: you keep the angle of the view on the front and foreshorten the side. I noticed you couldn't quite decide on either which is why I initially felt the whole drawing felt rather flat. If we aim for the former, we should see less of the left lamp, almost none even. If we aim for the latter, we probably wouldn't see so much of the door due to the wide fender flare covering it.
Secondly, I was having a hard time grasping the form from the door to the rear arch. I was trying to visualize how that side panel should look
if the rear arch was as deep as it was. I noted that the edge where the side panel and the fender arch met was connected in such a way that the top portion of the fender was greatly larger than it was towards the bottom of the car. I understand that's natural with most wide bodies, but here's the thing. When that happens, the lower half of the side panel protrudes out more than the upper half (closer to the window sill). It kept looking strange to me because that kind of form wasn't really showing up on the side panel. I saw the skirt is actually flush with the fenders' edge, and that - towards my understanding of form - meant your relatively flat side panel travels down and then curves outward towards that edge. Is that how it's supposed to look? Or was the entire side panel supposed to be relatively flat, but on a large slant? I can picture it being that, and that would make perfect sense according to your render, but I couldn't imagine that being what you intended, because it doesn't hold the rounded shape of a Fiat.