GTP_Rcrcool9
(Banned)
- 174
- GTP_Rcrcool9
I found the verdict a total lie and that should have been guilty.
The amount of evidence against her was overwhelming,
she lied to everyone repeatedly and the jury still found her not guilty?
Not to mention the heart stickers, stench of her car trunk and the duct tape...
That poor little girl really deserves some justice.
OmnisWhen will we be done with these stupid gossip trials? Thank you Nancy Grace, ET, Access Hollywood, and the rest of the stupid gossip shows for making this national news and distracting people from real issues.
I saw some parts of the trial but she was innocent?
It was?
gogatrsThought this was a lock notice for a minute.
The worst part is that she can't be tried again. :/
Reminds me of the Emmet Till case...
Yes, that is why so many are saying "WTF" (not me, though).
No it wasn't. If it were overwhelming then she would've been convicted.
Yulp. Because the defense was just enough better than the evidence.I'm not saying that I thought she was innocent, but I think the jury provided an appropriate decision with the evidence they were given (which wasn't much).
Thought this was a lock notice for a minute.
The worst part is that she can't be tried again. :/
Reminds me of the Emmet Till case...
Yes, it was, that is why the state charged her accodingly, and why the public convicted her before her trial. Without the defense that Jose came up with she was going to jail for first degree murder.
Matter of fact is no one can prove the girl didn't get drowned, that doesn't mean the evidence wasn't overwhelmingly against the mom before that theory was brought up.
I have no idea how the hell this got so big.
I'm glad you admitted that (even though it kinda throws your "overwhelming evidence" out the window). A conviction of first-degree murder without being able to provide cause of death or a clear motive is just not going to happen.