Genki probably fudged things regarding whether what they did was actually legal.I went back to look at the car lists of a couple of games that I played: PGR2 and Tokyo Xtreme Racer 3 and one odd thing I noticed. They both had Porsches in them. Granted, TXR3 had Gemballa Porsches, but still. How? I really want to know how this was possible? Did they just pay the EA sub-license or what?
I think if you mangle the designs slightly you can get away with it. For example you can exchange over half of the cells in your body with the ones next to them, and it would technicially be a different body but look identica.
Rufs are actually better performing versions of Porsche's anyway. The entire Ruf line is available to GT should they choose to exploit it and the license can't be that expensive if it's in other very small budget games. You could even turn Ruf's into fantasy GT and other touring/rally etc. cars, again, as other small budget games have shown is possible. Without Porsche available you'd think this would be a no-brainer for PD but apparently they are happy with 15 year old models and standard/semi-premium versions of the cars.idea: they could probably add a genuine Porsche bodykit and modifications to make the RUF's into their Porsche versions, like FH2 does.
idea: they could probably add a genuine Porsche bodykit and modifications to make the RUF's into their Porsche versions, like FH2 does.
You really think more people are waiting for old Porsche race cars than for new shiny ones?That's not how RUF works, and anyways lack of new Porsche's isn't why most people complain about the manufacture not being in any games outside of EA. More so they complain about the cars that are no longer made by Porsche and were never made by RUF like the race cars.
I wish people could stop complaining about the villans, "EA", and start directing their anger at Porsche, who is actually to blame.
EA is an intelligent company making an intelligent move. Porsche locked their cars away from us, not EA.
Yeah, probably. That could also explain how Rockstar was able to model Gemballa Porsches in Midnight Club 3.Genki probably fudged things regarding whether what they did was actually legal.
Remember, Genki had up to that point not actually bothered to even seek licencing, but the three games in the series prior to Xtreme Racer 3 were still loaded with the exact same cars that the GT series built its foundation on anyway. I suspect they got away with it for so long simply because it wasn't a headlining franchise like Gran Turismo or Need for Speed; and the somewhat looser restrictions on licencing in Japan where the franchise was always more popular.
Oh, right; Genki didn't even license the cars in the earlier TXR games and rather just named them something else. I think I can fully understand now, due to the looser restrictions in Japan and how not so well-known they were in comparison to GT or NFS; they were able to just slip under the radar. That makes sense as to why PD would never be able to get away with something similar.Remember, Genki had up to that point not actually bothered to even seek licencing, but the three games in the series prior to Xtreme Racer 3 were still loaded with the exact same cars that the GT series built its foundation on anyway. I suspect they got away with it for so long simply because it wasn't a headlining franchise like Gran Turismo or Need for Speed; and the somewhat looser restrictions on licencing in Japan where the franchise was always more popular.
Where does it say Ferrari are exclusive to Microsoft?Let me put it like this. Ferrari are exclusive to Microsoft and yet they freely sublicense Ferrari... to Sony... to anyone who will pay at a reasonable price.
Corporations exist to make money, that's their purpose for being.This is Microsoft we are talking about. One of the greediest scummy companies on the planet.
See above.I have no great love for Porsche and I dont blame them for this, they are money grubbing scum just like any car company ultimately. But I put car companies on a different level to game companies.
And yet they continue to exist and make money. If the cash is flowing in the door, nobody cares about top 10 lists.It is EA. They are scum. And the evidence backs that. They have been voted the worst American company multiple years, back to back.
This is false. Microsoft, circa the release of Forza 3, held an exclusive licence for Ferrari on Microsoft platforms. This means they had control over them officially appearing in games on the 360 and Windows PCs, and were able to allow or disallow other companies to do so. These were supposedly the terms that Microsoft used to bargain with EA to get Porsches into Forza 3. Microsoft has seemingly let those exclusive rights expire since then, since according to Greenawalt himself circa-Forza 4's prerelease they were unwilling to continue using them as competitive leverage over other games.Let me put it like this. Ferrari are exclusive to Microsoft and yet they freely sublicense Ferrari... to Sony... to anyone who will pay at a reasonable price.
At least one of those "wins", and probably all of them, was a direct result of a 4Chan raid on the voting in that particular "contest"; so it means absolutely nothing.They have been voted the worst American company multiple years, back to back.
Afaik, MS had an exclusive Ferrari license on PC and Xbox. Not on PlayStation.Let me put it like this. Ferrari are exclusive to Microsoft and yet they freely sublicense Ferrari... to Sony... to anyone who will pay at a reasonable price.
o_O Um, what? This has to be a rumor. If it isn't, then; I don't know what to do. Maybe I'll scream in excitement or something.
Must have been a dealo_O Um, what? This has to be a rumor. If it isn't, then; I don't know what to do. Maybe I'll scream in excitement or something.
This is how I feel about Singer. There must be a way to get the 911 in the game. Just name them Singer without using the name Porsche and 911. Even if they could use the code name for the model like 964 and 993, etc. There has to be a way.
Does the EA deal include "likeness" to a Porsche? Because, whether PD have a license or not, a Ruf looks like a Porsche.
Ruf, unlike singer, is a Manufacterer so despite the "likeness", that has no effect on Ruf.
It blows my mind that you actually blame the company buying the license. Especially with that excuse.They're both to blame. But at least Porsche has a point when they say that they're in the car business, not in the video game business and that they'd rather leave it to EA to manage the video game license for them.
EA, on the other hand, are blaming Porsche for everything, saying that "it's Porsche who decides what games they want their cars to be in, we have nothing to do with that". Yeah right...
EA = Need for Greed.
I heard the rumor that this had got Porsche very angry, and that the relationship between PD and them had been bad until GT5. In trying to earn the license for Porsche (failed due to the deal, of course), PD showed them modelled Kuebelwagen and Schwimmwagen, both of which were designed by Ferdinand Porsche, and remedy the relationship.If they could have just done that they most certainly wouldn't have gone into such a panic when people found Kaz's 911 GT3 as a hidden car in... er, GT3. And the widely reported and showcased Lamborghini Diablo in the Japanese release of the same game wouldn't have had to be pulled in North America and completely deleted off the disc for PAL releases.