CLOSED: 2.0 Advanced Competition 108
- Thread starter SlipZtrEm
- 101 comments
- 6,592 views
- Status
- 694
Didn't expect many people have difficult time to unlock the Ahrweiler-Winter photo travel location. The Ahrweiler-Winter is acutally a very good photo travel location. Like the lighting and warm feeling in it.
For those that cannot unlock Ahrweiler-Winter. The snow tracks are acutally very good for photo shooting too. Those snow tracks photos posted so far are acutally very lovely as well. 👍
Keep the entries come in
For those that cannot unlock Ahrweiler-Winter. The snow tracks are acutally very good for photo shooting too. Those snow tracks photos posted so far are acutally very lovely as well. 👍
Keep the entries come in
![[Nor]MclarenF1](/forum/data/avatars/m/169/169289.jpg?1413287138){kind=avatar}
- 2,281
- Moss
- hoydeskrekk
GPR
Back to the drawing board then...
- 5,999
- Over there
- ask me
Last edited:
- 2,281
- Moss
- hoydeskrekk
[Nor]MclarenF1;7922557Alot of great entries so far I must say. I personaly went for the slightly obvious rally car at Chamonix-alternative.Hoping it wont come back and bite me.
Anyway...
FINAL ENTRY
*Changed since I didn't manage to read the rules the first time.
Entry changed since my first attempt didn't comply with the rules.
This one's a bitch a rush job in my opinion. Tried to add a little extra snow on the car but not really pleased with the result to put it gently. Anyway, I'm all out of time so I'll just let it hang around and we'll see what happens.
- 5,888
- Vidzeme, Riga
- Driverman447
- None.
- 4,429
- Arkhangelsk
- ray29rus
Final Entry
Арвайлер - зима_5 ps by RaY29rus, on Flickr
Арвайлер - зима_5 ps by RaY29rus, on Flickr
![[empty space]](/forum/data/avatars/m/47/47550.jpg?1277426423){kind=avatar}
- 3,863
- forever_n00b
- random1self
Final Entry
- 2,281
- Moss
- hoydeskrekk
@driftinziggy: Heads up! That preview is too large. Maximum 500 pixels in the longest direction according to the rules. I know I would be bummed out if I didn't make the poll because of a technicality.
- 1,679
- Sin City, USA
- Primus Ortus
Final Entry
- 694
final christmas entry
.
entry changed... More christmas-like
zzz_pt your original entry was good enough. Your new entry might break the 2.0 competition rules.
You are not allow to do:
. Add shapes or objects from outside of GT5, signatures excepted.
Those snow flakes look really nice, but I guess is not allow.
zzz_pt
Premium
- 8,188
- Porto living in Hamburg
- zzz_pt
it's a brush... brushes are from PS. :S I think everyone uses brushes... I mean, in my first entry I used them but with different purposes.
But if this is the issue, I can make this thing using PS tools...
I'll wait for some confirmation on this matter 1. if we can't use brushes and 2. if I can make the same just with PS tools (other than brush lol)
But if this is the issue, I can make this thing using PS tools...
I'll wait for some confirmation on this matter
1. if we can't use brushes and 2. if I can make the same just with PS tools (other than brush lol)
Last edited:
- 5,999
- Over there
- ask me
[Nor]MclarenF1;7925438@driftinziggy: Heads up! That preview is too large. Maximum 500 pixels in the longest direction according to the rules. I know I would be bummed out if I didn't make the poll because of a technicality.
Adjusted...and thanks for that heads up!
- 303
- Reverand33
I'll put back my 1st version. Thanks. You should put not to use brushes in the rules 
- 303
- Reverand33
Final Entry
Feliz Natal
i had to look over because i thought i had seen this photo before, it wasn't exact but looks pretty similar. https://www.gtplanet.net/forum/showthread.php?p=6315227#post6315227
- 27,387
- Toronto
- NewAesthetic
- SlipZtrEm
Would be clearer
You're still adding a shape that was not natively in the image, so no. Though that does make me realize the wording of that particular rule could be slightly clearer; instead of just "GT5", it should also not allow duplication of any shapes/objects from within the image (just as the removal of objects is also mentioned in another bullet-point). The exception to this is "cleaning" shapes like a Standard's ugly textures or low-poly body, but I think most will agree that cleaning those is quite different from adding a whole weather-based scene to an image
.Rambling a bit here, but as an example using Raph's image above; if it were a still shot, and there were no cloud of snow behind his car, using any post-editing to create one would be ineligible by 2.0 standards. The goal and aim of 2.0 is to work, primarily, with what we're given from the game, and to at least give those who can't/don't post-game edit a chance each week.
Hope that helps
- Status
Similar threads
- Poll
- Sticky
