Competitive Racing License

Hey I get having a life. I don't have kids no, but I do understand that indeed you can't always forsee this happening.

But tbh if I was this lucky to have a significant other and kids, I wouldn't care for that stupid elo-number at all.
It's the biggest gift in life and all I'd ever want a family.

Some people don't have that luck.
At the moment the closest I have is my friends. And don't get me wrong 'FOR MY FRIENDS, FOR MY FAMILY!!!' but there is something diffrent to having that significant other ;)

Look at the things you have an cherrish those!

Couldn't agree more! Hence why I quit the race and got up in the first place :)

Thank you for the reply, you seem to be a great guy! Don't stress, your SO will come when you least expect it
 
Last edited:
Hey I get having a life. I don't have kids no, but I do understand that indeed you can't always forsee this happening.

But tbh if I was this lucky to have a significant other and kids, I wouldn't care for that stupid elo-number at all.
It's the biggest gift in life and all I'd ever want a family.

Some people don't have that luck.
At the moment the closest I have is my friends. And don't get me wrong 'FOR MY FRIENDS, FOR MY FAMILY!!!' but there is something diffrent to having that significant other ;)

Look at the things you have an cherrish those!
You're arguement is so whack.

The skill rating number matters because it restricts you from accessing certain lobbies.

Yesterday, I was at1420. I had issues, now I'm 1319....now I can't get into U1400 rooms. All from the disco penalty. Completely retarded.

The next part of your logic is rich...if you're lucky enough to have kids, you shouldn't care...

Right, like people who have kids can't have a hobby they take semi seriously...or if you have kids, just stick to lobbiea with the license off. You know, have kids, limit your lobby selection by 1/2, that's the way it goes.

I've played online games for over 10 years. MMOs, FPS, and racing games more than anything. The attitude you have about the amount of commitment people need to have to a race is gross and selfish. You're like that mmo raid leader screaming at people because they need to go to the bathroom :lol:

You want to run a lobby with your militant rules, fine, but keep that crap out of the public open lobby. You seem like the kind of joker who would kick someone from a lobby for making a joke on GTP.
 
You're arguement is so whack.

The skill rating number matters because it restricts you from accessing certain lobbies.

Yesterday, I was at1420. I had issues, now I'm 1319....now I can't get into U1400 rooms. All from the disco penalty. Completely retarded.

The next part of your logic is rich...if you're lucky enough to have kids, you shouldn't care...

Right, like people who have kids can't have a hobby they take semi seriously...or if you have kids, just stick to lobbiea with the license off. You know, have kids, limit your lobby selection by 1/2, that's the way it goes.

I've played online games for over 10 years. MMOs, FPS, and racing games more than anything. The attitude you have about the amount of commitment people need to have to a race is gross and selfish. You're like that mmo raid leader screaming at people because they need to go to the bathroom :lol:

You want to run a lobby with your militant rules, fine, but keep that crap out of the public open lobby. You seem like the kind of joker who would kick someone from a lobby for making a joke on GTP.

I'm always run E100 rooms you've been invited to join multiple times if you'd be running on playstation.


I do 'not' care if you have to leave as this is not a teamgame. But I prefer people to stay. Giving out penalties is by far the best way to enforce rules on an online comunity.

I've also admitted that we could have a system that gives some room for people like you with kids in which you can leave a race once every so many races. I think it settled on once every 5 races but I'm open to hear your prefference on once every how many races.

We get bans and warnings on an online forum we don't reward the nice people...

My opinion is not gross and selfish... That would be the world upside down... I'd prefer common sense and politeness to be the norm you know you start a game with people you finish it. Isn't it selfish to consider your personal time more worth then the game you yourself descided to join?

Honnest question because I do not encounter that problem are there this few races that have a lower then 1400 rating?

Could you also stop misrepresenting me? I understand your issue but the system does exactly what it's supposed to do. Put the ones who do have time for a full race together and those who don't...

The thing is there are solution to your issue. An 'issue' created by your PERSONAL experience... And sms should adres this, while there are ways to work around it?

Have you considered adding those people in those rooms as friends? In no time you'll have plenty of friends to race with without having to care about your elo-rating.

I was a dungeonleader and no my group wouldn't get screamed at for thing like bathroombreaks.
My group did have the manners to say they are going to the toilet next chance they had. This made it possible to wait for him/her to be back. No timers, no ********, just mutual respect.

And yes kids limit your lobbyselection by half... How is that inherently bad? Everything has consequences and having kids has big consequences. Good and bad I agree it's not awesome but this way you'll end up playing with other people in your situation.

And no I would not kick someone for making a joke on gtp...
But 'ot everything is as clear in text as in speach and deliberzte ramming is no joke imo...

Again if on playstation still welcomz I don't force people to'do anything and you can leave the race anytime. Consequences beeing the elo-rating hit...

Sorry for the lang post and I hope you finally understand I do not think you shouldn't race or that you're just a whiner. Thing is you just want one solution. And that solution is to remove the system that enforces manners...
There are other solutions...
 
Last edited:
You're arguement is so whack.

The skill rating number matters because it restricts you from accessing certain lobbies.

Yesterday, I was at1420. I had issues, now I'm 1319....now I can't get into U1400 rooms. All from the disco penalty. Completely retarded.

The next part of your logic is rich...if you're lucky enough to have kids, you shouldn't care...

Right, like people who have kids can't have a hobby they take semi seriously...or if you have kids, just stick to lobbiea with the license off. You know, have kids, limit your lobby selection by 1/2, that's the way it goes.

I've played online games for over 10 years. MMOs, FPS, and racing games more than anything. The attitude you have about the amount of commitment people need to have to a race is gross and selfish. You're like that mmo raid leader screaming at people because they need to go to the bathroom :lol:

You want to run a lobby with your militant rules, fine, but keep that crap out of the public open lobby. You seem like the kind of joker who would kick someone from a lobby for making a joke on GTP.

I think you could use some strategy, like i did.

Stop joining random lobbies, stop doing GT3 races and stop doing races without a full qualy. I went from 1440 to 1590 by just avoiding this and focusing on smaller lobbies.

To reduce disconnects and stuff, just open your own lobby. Races with 2-3 people will still give you enough points if you win, and if you´re concerned about the rating, it´s a good way to get back to normal levels.

If i was doing what i was doing right when the game started i would probably be 1100 or 1200, not because of skill, but because of bad choices.

Like everything in motorsports, it takes a while to understand the rules and game the system. This, of course, if a good rating is important. Some people are fine with just playing without caring about the number at all.

I believe you´ll see more and more people restricting lobbies by the safety rating, and not by the "speed" rating, considering this speed rating is more about not having disconnects than actual speed.

----

As for the disconnects and the penalty, they could solve this by keep scoring the quitter just to make sure who stays gets the points.

Example:

race with 10 guys

1st gets 10 points
5th gets 0 points
10th place guy -5

So if the races finishes with only three cars and the other seven are only registered in the scoring, it makes no difference if the person has quit the lobby or not, he already lost -5 for finishing last.

The only reason why penalties were implemented was because it was very frustrating to start a 20 car race in 19th, climbing up to 3rd to find out that you had almost no achievement as only five cars finished, so you were 3rd out of five cars. If you keep scoring the others, it makes no difference whatsoever if they quit or not, which is why they could make this adjustment.

You will still have an incentive not to quit, as you would finish badly and lose points based on your placing. Who stays racing also is rewarded by getting points for beating whoever quit or is in the pits.

Those 40-50 point penalties for quitting (which happens mostly on disconnects for us in this thread) are not achieving anything it order to make the races cleaner or more fun.
 
I'm always run E100 rooms you've been invited to join multiple times if you'd be running on playstation.


I do 'not' care if you have to leave as this is not a teamgame. But I prefer people to stay. Giving out penalties is by far the best way to enforce rules on an online comunity.

I've also admitted that we could have a system that gives some room for people like you with kids in which you can leave a race once every so many races. I think it settled on once every 5 races but I'm open to hear your prefference on once every how many races.

We get bans and warnings on an online forum we don't reward the nice people...

My opinion is not gross and selfish... That would be the world upside down... I'd prefer common sense and politeness to be the norm you know you start a game with people you finish it. Isn't it selfish to consider your personal time more worth then the game you yourself descided to join?

Honnest question because I do not encounter that problem are there this few races that have a lower then 1400 rating?

Could you also stop misrepresenting me? I understand your issue but the system does exactly what it's supposed to do. Put the ones who do have time for a full race together and those who don't...

The thing is there are solution to your issue. An 'issue' created by your PERSONAL experience... And sms should adres this, while there are ways to work around it?

Have you considered adding those people in those rooms as friends? In no time you'll have plenty of friends to race with without having to care about your elo-rating.

I was a dungeonleader and no my group wouldn't get screamed at for thing like bathroombreaks.
My group did have the manners to say they are going to the toilet next chance they had. This made it possible to wait for him/her to be back. No timers, no ********, just mutual respect.

And yes kids limit your lobbyselection by half... How is that inherently bad? Everything has consequences and having kids has big consequences. Good and bad I agree it's not awesome but this way you'll end up playing with other people in your situation.

And no I would not kick someone for making a joke on gtp...
But 'ot everything is as clear in text as in speach and deliberzte ramming is no joke imo...

Again if on playstation still welcomz I don't force people to'do anything and you can leave the race anytime. Consequences beeing the elo-rating hit...

Sorry for the lang post and I hope you finally understand I do not think you shouldn't race or that you're just a whiner. Thing is you just want one solution. And that solution is to remove the system that enforces manners...
There are other solutions...
Going back to pcars1, lobby selection is not great in this game. You're at the mercy of the community if you want semi full grids, and "normal"-ish settings.

Doing a quick check of the lobbies, I saw 4 lobbies I could no longer join because of my rating. If I fall below 1300, it's going to go up even more.

Don't get me wrong, I get where you're coming from. Like I said, I've played MMOs where getting a group of people to commit an hour or two to accomplish a certain thing is like pulling teeth. I've participated in more online drift comps that I can count - if you don't know how that they work, you spend at least 3/4 of your time sitting there waiting. I've waited my turn for almost an hour, only to have my opponent back out at the last minute, a complete waste of my time. I've been part of race leagues where, ya, for longer races, there was times it was tough to get people to stay to the end of a race. Some people, we just knew that if they weren't in P1 by the end of lap 1, they would rage quit. So we came up with incentives to get people to stay - award points at halfway, award points for staying (we also dropped the two lowest scores from the championship table, giving everyone two mulligans in case something happened mid race). I've watched people here on GTP put countless hours into organizing all kinds of fantastic leaugues, series, tournaments, and the like, only to have less that 1/4 of the people who signed up actually show up.

I fully get the idea that if you sign up for a thing, you should see it through. That said, and I think you'll agree, real life always has to come first, you have to give people the benifit of the doubt there.

I guess I'm just inclined to have faith in people, that most who do join a lobby do so with intention to see it out to the finish. Obviously there will be some bad apples who "rage quit", but I don't like the idea that the actions of those bad apples force all of us to have to use this restrictive system.

At the end of the day the major issue is the size of the penalty for leaving or quitting. If it was reasonable, I don't think we'd need this discussion - although then you might argue that it's not harsh enough, and doesn't discourage rage quitting enough.

I guess my major thing is though, I kind of take what you're saying and flip it back to you. If you want to play the game on what could essentially be called "hard core mode", ie, you do longer length races, leaving or quitting has harsh penalties, etc., then add a bunch of friends who are looking for the same experience, create a league with a full championship, or join an existing league - there's lots of leagues and series running which have all kinds of incentive to finish races and "punishment" for quitting early.

However, for the open lobby, which consists mostly of "quick race" type lobbies, and is logically the more common place to find players who might be considered "casual", having those kind of penalties for leaving or quitting is too much. Especially when you put it in the context of it impacting which lobbies you can join.
 
I think you could use some strategy, like i did.

Stop joining random lobbies, stop doing GT3 races and stop doing races without a full qualy. I went from 1440 to 1590 by just avoiding this and focusing on smaller lobbies.

To reduce disconnects and stuff, just open your own lobby. Races with 2-3 people will still give you enough points if you win, and if you´re concerned about the rating, it´s a good way to get back to normal levels.

If i was doing what i was doing right when the game started i would probably be 1100 or 1200, not because of skill, but because of bad choices.

Like everything in motorsports, it takes a while to understand the rules and game the system. This, of course, if a good rating is important. Some people are fine with just playing without caring about the number at all.

I believe you´ll see more and more people restricting lobbies by the safety rating, and not by the "speed" rating, considering this speed rating is more about not having disconnects than actual speed.

----

As for the disconnects and the penalty, they could solve this by keep scoring the quitter just to make sure who stays gets the points.

Example:

race with 10 guys

1st gets 10 points
5th gets 0 points
10th place guy -5

So if the races finishes with only three cars and the other seven are only registered in the scoring, it makes no difference if the person has quit the lobby or not, he already lost -5 for finishing last.

The only reason why penalties were implemented was because it was very frustrating to start a 20 car race in 19th, climbing up to 3rd to find out that you had almost no achievement as only five cars finished, so you were 3rd out of five cars. If you keep scoring the others, it makes no difference whatsoever if they quit or not, which is why they could make this adjustment.

You will still have an incentive not to quit, as you would finish badly and lose points based on your placing. Who stays racing also is rewarded by getting points for beating whoever quit or is in the pits.

Those 40-50 point penalties for quitting (which happens mostly on disconnects for us in this thread) are not achieving anything it order to make the races cleaner or more fun.

This would work but with some adjustment, only because...

Putting myself in the mindset of a quitter (I'll try)

Ok I'll quit this race I'll only lose 5 points that's not a great hit... next race ok I'll quit this race I'll only lose 5 points that's not a great hit... next race wow I'm in the lead those ten points I lost I've gained back.

This means I could quit 2 out of three races and potentially the one I choose to stay for I can cancel everything out. The points would have to exponentially reward greater I would think for this to be of benefit.
 
I think you could use some strategy, like i did.

Stop joining random lobbies, stop doing GT3 races and stop doing races without a full qualy. I went from 1440 to 1590 by just avoiding this and focusing on smaller lobbies.

To reduce disconnects and stuff, just open your own lobby. Races with 2-3 people will still give you enough points if you win, and if you´re concerned about the rating, it´s a good way to get back to normal levels.

If i was doing what i was doing right when the game started i would probably be 1100 or 1200, not because of skill, but because of bad choices.

Like everything in motorsports, it takes a while to understand the rules and game the system. This, of course, if a good rating is important. Some people are fine with just playing without caring about the number at all.

I believe you´ll see more and more people restricting lobbies by the safety rating, and not by the "speed" rating, considering this speed rating is more about not having disconnects than actual speed.

----

As for the disconnects and the penalty, they could solve this by keep scoring the quitter just to make sure who stays gets the points.

Example:

race with 10 guys

1st gets 10 points
5th gets 0 points
10th place guy -5

So if the races finishes with only three cars and the other seven are only registered in the scoring, it makes no difference if the person has quit the lobby or not, he already lost -5 for finishing last.

The only reason why penalties were implemented was because it was very frustrating to start a 20 car race in 19th, climbing up to 3rd to find out that you had almost no achievement as only five cars finished, so you were 3rd out of five cars. If you keep scoring the others, it makes no difference whatsoever if they quit or not, which is why they could make this adjustment.

You will still have an incentive not to quit, as you would finish badly and lose points based on your placing. Who stays racing also is rewarded by getting points for beating whoever quit or is in the pits.

Those 40-50 point penalties for quitting (which happens mostly on disconnects for us in this thread) are not achieving anything it order to make the races cleaner or more fun.
I agree, and get what you're saying....but basically what you did was give me a long list of rooms that I shouldn't join. More restriction, less options available. Especially if you want to race against more than 3 people.

I think maybe your missing my point. I don't care about the rating, at all. I'm not looking to boost my rating by cheering the system, I've known from the beginning I can run small lobbies with some AI opponents and rack up the points. I only care about being able to turn racing laps against real people, and right now, the rating is restricting what I can do.

Some people suggest just rooms with the rating off...well, that cuts room selection in 1/2. You say avoid GT3..:that cuts room selection by at least 3/4.

I don't know...I feel like I've spent more time surfing the open lobbies than most people on here, going back to PCARS 1 as well....I think people are vastly over estimating what exactly is out there in terms of lobby selection. It's bad on a good day.
 
I agree, and get what you're saying....but basically what you did was give me a long list of rooms that I shouldn't join. More restriction, less options available. Especially if you want to race against more than 3 people.

I think maybe your missing my point. I don't care about the rating, at all. I'm not looking to boost my rating by cheering the system, I've known from the beginning I can run small lobbies with some AI opponents and rack up the points. I only care about being able to turn racing laps against real people, and right now, the rating is restricting what I can do.

Some people suggest just rooms with the rating off...well, that cuts room selection in 1/2. You say avoid GT3..:that cuts room selection by at least 3/4.

Oh, i see. I guess these restrictions are more used in the PS4 then. On PC i rarely see a lobby restricted by the number, in fact at best you see 30-40 rooms, and a good chunk of them don´t use the rating at all.

This would work but with some adjustment, only because...

Putting myself in the mindset of a quitter (I'll try)

Ok I'll quit this race I'll only lose 5 points that's not a great hit... next race ok I'll quit this race I'll only lose 5 points that's not a great hit... next race wow I'm in the lead those ten points I lost I've gained back.

This means I could quit 2 out of three races and potentially the one I choose to stay for I can cancel everything out. The points would have to exponentially reward greater I would think for this to be of benefit.

But put yourself in the mindset of the guy who kept racing.

I still gained the points for beating the quitters, so if they parked on the side, are waiting on the pits or went to sleep after turning the game off it doesn´t make any difference. I beat them, and i got the points, so their presence in the lobby is not important at all.

As for gaining back your points, it´s kind of what happens in real life, right? A driver has two DNFs and then wins, so he has 25 points. A second guy can finish 11th three times and have zero points, because no one is rewarded by just finishing a race. Another driver might finish 3rd in these three races, racking up 45 points, still a better performance than the first guy.

What the first guy lost is the opportunity to gain points, which is what happens when you get a DNF. Others get the points you were not able to get.

The only similar situation that could happens in real life is that if drivers started losing points because people DNF and the raced ended with two or three cars...
 
As for gaining back your points, it´s kind of what happens in real life, right? A driver has two DNFs and then wins, so he has 25 points. A second guy can finish 11th three times and have zero points, because no one is rewarded by just finishing a race. Another driver might finish 3rd in these three races, racking up 45 points, still a better performance than the first guy.

Ok this part may have something in it then. There could be a different set of points that are raced for - that is why in real life 11th place will continue? Lets not single out quitter but dangle a carrot to finish a race. Maybe the first 5 places can score extra points that are visibly added to a skill rating,

1 - 15
2 - 13
3 - 10
4 - 5
5 - 2

finshing lower scores you 0 (something that would please twitcher ;))

Finishing a race and finishing the race in the top 5 stands to have a big reward and then the disco penalties would be a moot point.
 
So I ran in an online race, 5 laps at Monza. After the first lap got disconnected and had to take a 41 point deduction on the chin...

That can't be right can it? Went down from B1486 to B1445...that seems a bit harsh.

Then the next race at Hockenheim, 5 laps I won the race against 5 other racers and my rating went up to B1447...only got 2 points.

I'm fine if they leave the disconnect penalties but then I would think there must be some reward for people actually finishing the race. It is going to take a looooong time to get back to 1486.

I for one take pride in my rating and it just demotivates me to take a massive 41 point hit on something that was out of my control...
 
Ran around 30 races now. At D1458 and have experienced 0 (or 1) disconnects. No lag or weird bugs or cars jumping. Net code seems bulletproof so far. I have a suspicion that there is some PSN issues or the way game works with PSN. On PC I can go side by side with people with red ping (200+) and have no problem.
 
Ran around 30 races now. At D1458 and have experienced 0 (or 1) disconnects. No lag or weird bugs or cars jumping. Net code seems bulletproof so far. I have a suspicion that there is some PSN issues or the way game works with PSN. On PC I can go side by side with people with red ping (200+) and have no problem.
It's because pc2 was specifically designed, written and tested for the pc. It was simply ported over to the ps4 and not optimised for it at all.
 
It's because pc2 was specifically designed, written and tested for the pc. It was simply ported over to the ps4 and not optimised for it at all.
I am a PS user and have never been disconnected in around 30 races as well.

Never had issues with close racing apart from three lag spikes every time someone enters the room.

What I have seen is multiple ‘red’ ping players being disconnected.
 
I have a suspicion that there is some PSN issues or the way game works with PSN.

On PS4 I've done about 60 races and had 0 in-race disconnects. I think I disconnected during qualifying once, and also a handful of occasions where I've joined a lobby late in qualifying, and it doesn't seem to take me to the pit garage, or transition to the race, so I just exit. But that's just my personal experience, who's to say what the issues people are having really are.
 
Personally I've not had a single disconnect yet and the host migration also seems to work very well (to the point of not noticing until after the race has finished.
 
Agree. minimum ping allowed is one of those much needed features to set up a lobby.

I've even ran in leagues with it on. It seems some people insisted on running on mobile wi-fi...
 
Similar thing happened to me, but I was booted from a race and lost 40 points. Why? Because some idiot driving a red 458 like I was caused a 5 car pile up, and someone thought it was me and killed me off!

Then I enter another race, and this idiot I was lapping decides to play destruction derby with me. Took me out of the race and cost me points.

Then, again last night, I'm in a race, first place, and the numbskull behind me keeps foot flat on the accelerator while I'm slowing for a turn, taking me out of the race.

So in one night I've lost about 60 points. How long to get them back now??? What a joke, I'm getting turned off multiplayer now (the lag when someone joins / leaves doesn't help either. Why is it only an issue with this game!)

So I ran in an online race, 5 laps at Monza. After the first lap got disconnected and had to take a 41 point deduction on the chin...

That can't be right can it? Went down from B1486 to B1445...that seems a bit harsh.

Then the next race at Hockenheim, 5 laps I won the race against 5 other racers and my rating went up to B1447...only got 2 points.

I'm fine if they leave the disconnect penalties but then I would think there must be some reward for people actually finishing the race. It is going to take a looooong time to get back to 1486.

I for one take pride in my rating and it just demotivates me to take a massive 41 point hit on something that was out of my control...
 
So the maximum skill points that you can get is 15000.
I don't know how in hell anyone will ever manage that.
Winning/coming in the top 3 should be awarded more points and until less people have problems like disconnecting from the game less points should be taken away.
 
Anyone see anyone rated over 1700? I haven’t yet. I have a feeling maybe someone can hit 2000 if they win every time but I don’t see how you can get to 4000 required for one of the current events.
 
I spend hours just trying to get 40 or so points back, get to A1374, then a random disconnect half way through lap 1 in a race, now down to A1341 :banghead: I really hope this is fixed.... atleast the disconnect issue.

Other than that, online has been (somewhat) enjoyable.
 
Woops my bad.
Still feel like they should award a bit more points for top3/top5 based on the competitiveness and skill on other drivers
They do.

The points you gain depend on how good the people you beat are in comparison to you. Come first against a field of much lower skilled drivers and your not going to gain much (nor should you), come first and beat a field of much driver rated much higher than you and you will get a much bigger haul of points.

Its the same system that used to rank chess players (right the way up to Grand Masters) and generally viewed as a robust and fair system.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elo_rating_system
 
They do.

The points you gain depend on how good the people you beat are in comparison to you. Come first against a field of much lower skilled drivers and your not going to gain much (nor should you), come first and beat a field of much driver rated much higher than you and you will get a much bigger haul of points.

Its the same system that used to rank chess players (right the way up to Grand Masters) and generally viewed as a robust and fair system.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elo_rating_system
Then they should at least fix the issue of taking points away for disconnects. As it isn't the players fault that they leave.
 
If there was no penalty for rage quitting then you would see races ending with one person on track, see AC online. I can’t tell you how many times I’ve started a race with 16 people and after a lap or two there is only 3 or 4 left. If there was no penalty for disconnects people would simply pull the plug on their modem when they were in a position to lose points. I agree the disconnection penalty is too harsh but it is necessary, otherwise nobody would ever lose points on their license. The gaming of the system would explode if there was no disconnect penalty.
 
Yeah, it’s there for a reason, the disconnect penalty thing. The points deduction should be reduced and I’m confident will be reduced. The amount of points you get by winning/losing may also need to be looked at, that is IF SMS meant for some players to reach 4000 rating. If they think that top-tier racers (aliens) should be at 2000, then maybe it’s fine as it is. I just don’t see how people can reach much higher than 2000 with it being the way it is. There just aren’t enough lobbies ranked higher than even 1500, so every race someone with a rating of 1700+ enters is a potential to lose a lot of points, but the reward will be minimal.
 
Back